Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background and Purpose:
Urinary stones >2 cm are traditionally managed with percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Recently, flexible ureteroscopy and laser
lithotripsy) (FURSL) has been used to manage them with comparable
results. In a comparative study of renal stones between 2 and 3 cm,
FURSL was reported to need less second-stage procedures and be just as
effective as PCNL. Our purpose was to review the literature for renal
stones >2 cm managed by ureteroscopy and holmium lasertripsy.
Materials and Methods:
A systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis was performed using
studies identified by a literature search from 1990s (the first reported
large renal stones treated ureteroscopically) to August 2011. All
English language articles reporting on a minimum of 10 patients treated
with FURSL for renal stones >2 cm were included. Two reviewers
independently extracted the data from each study. The data of studies
with comparable results were included into a meta-analysis.
Results:
In nine studies, 445 patients (460 renal units) were reportedly treated
with FURSL. The mean operative time was 82.5 minutes (28–215 min). The
mean stone-free rate was 93.7% (77%–96.7%), with an average of 1.6
procedures per patient. The mean stone size was 2.5 cm. An overall
complication rate was 10.1%. Major complications developed in 21 (5.3%)
patients and minor complications developed in 19 (4.8%) patients. A
subgroup analysis shows that FURSL has a 95.7% stone-free rate with
stones 2–3 cm and 84.6% in those >3 cm (P=0.01), with a minor
complication rate of 14.3% and 15.4%, respectively, and a major
complication rate of 0% and 11.5%, respectively.
Conclusion:
In experienced hands, FURSL can successfully treat patients with stones
>2 cm with a high stone-free rate and a low complication rate.
Although the studies are from high-volume experienced centers and may
not be sufficient to alter everyday routine practice, this review has
shown that the efficacy of FURSL allows an alternative to PCNL.
Humans, Kidney Calculi, Lithotripsy, Laser, Severity of Illness Index, Ureteroscopes, Ureteroscopy, Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review
1257-1263
Aboumarzouk, Omar M
3c7e2433-638d-4378-9931-902fdc68acce
Monga, Manoj
9ab0c2b2-1eb2-41e5-8559-37427097dc00
Kata, Slawomir G
bb011d0d-01f0-4c99-ac40-e8db8d4ef4d0
Traxer, Olivier
2fa78817-b6f8-4f00-b389-c9c9ddbd01f3
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
October 2012
Aboumarzouk, Omar M
3c7e2433-638d-4378-9931-902fdc68acce
Monga, Manoj
9ab0c2b2-1eb2-41e5-8559-37427097dc00
Kata, Slawomir G
bb011d0d-01f0-4c99-ac40-e8db8d4ef4d0
Traxer, Olivier
2fa78817-b6f8-4f00-b389-c9c9ddbd01f3
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Aboumarzouk, Omar M, Monga, Manoj, Kata, Slawomir G, Traxer, Olivier and Somani, Bhaskar K
(2012)
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal of Endourology, 26 (10), .
(doi:10.1089/end.2012.0217).
Abstract
Background and Purpose:
Urinary stones >2 cm are traditionally managed with percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Recently, flexible ureteroscopy and laser
lithotripsy) (FURSL) has been used to manage them with comparable
results. In a comparative study of renal stones between 2 and 3 cm,
FURSL was reported to need less second-stage procedures and be just as
effective as PCNL. Our purpose was to review the literature for renal
stones >2 cm managed by ureteroscopy and holmium lasertripsy.
Materials and Methods:
A systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis was performed using
studies identified by a literature search from 1990s (the first reported
large renal stones treated ureteroscopically) to August 2011. All
English language articles reporting on a minimum of 10 patients treated
with FURSL for renal stones >2 cm were included. Two reviewers
independently extracted the data from each study. The data of studies
with comparable results were included into a meta-analysis.
Results:
In nine studies, 445 patients (460 renal units) were reportedly treated
with FURSL. The mean operative time was 82.5 minutes (28–215 min). The
mean stone-free rate was 93.7% (77%–96.7%), with an average of 1.6
procedures per patient. The mean stone size was 2.5 cm. An overall
complication rate was 10.1%. Major complications developed in 21 (5.3%)
patients and minor complications developed in 19 (4.8%) patients. A
subgroup analysis shows that FURSL has a 95.7% stone-free rate with
stones 2–3 cm and 84.6% in those >3 cm (P=0.01), with a minor
complication rate of 14.3% and 15.4%, respectively, and a major
complication rate of 0% and 11.5%, respectively.
Conclusion:
In experienced hands, FURSL can successfully treat patients with stones
>2 cm with a high stone-free rate and a low complication rate.
Although the studies are from high-volume experienced centers and may
not be sufficient to alter everyday routine practice, this review has
shown that the efficacy of FURSL allows an alternative to PCNL.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 October 2012
Published date: October 2012
Keywords:
Humans, Kidney Calculi, Lithotripsy, Laser, Severity of Illness Index, Ureteroscopes, Ureteroscopy, Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 419085
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419085
ISSN: 0892-7790
PURE UUID: 5a1fa837-64ac-407a-9cf5-4d62aa4b2323
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Mar 2018 16:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 19:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Omar M Aboumarzouk
Author:
Manoj Monga
Author:
Slawomir G Kata
Author:
Olivier Traxer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics