Decreasing cost of flexible ureterorenoscopy: single-use laser fiber cost analysis
Decreasing cost of flexible ureterorenoscopy: single-use laser fiber cost analysis
Objective
To
demonstrate a cost benefit while using disposable laser fibers as
compared with reusable laser fibers. Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) is a
central component of endourology. It is vital that for service provision
and training purposes, costs are kept down while delivering this
service. Laser fibers are known to damage scopes causing high repair
and/or replacement costs.
Materials and Methods
Data
for consecutive FURS procedures during 2 periods in a single center
were compared. First, with the use of reusable fibers and second, with
single-use fibers. Cost of laser fibers and repairs was recorded. The
study excludes the cost of the initial purchase of the ureterorenoscopes
or the holmium laser equipment and costs associated with staffing and
hospital stay.
Results
The
total number of FURS carried out in period 1 and period 2 was 260 and
265, respectively. A total of 13 reusable (185 procedures) and 168
disposable laser fibers were used in these 2 periods, respectively.
There was a reduction in laser damaged ureteroscopes from 9 to 3 in the
second period. This resulted in a £16,800 reduction in repair cost. This
more than offsets the increased costs of single-use fibers.
Conclusion
On
the basis of our data, it is more cost-effective to use a disposable
laser fiber, as it prevents scope damage, which can happen because of
microfractures with repeated laser use. Moreover, this will also save
time and/or resource required with sterilization.
Costs and Cost Analysis, Disposable Equipment, Equipment Design, Humans, Kidney, Lasers, Time Factors, Ureteroscopes, Ureteroscopy, Comparative Study, Journal Article
1003-1005
Chapman, R A
e74a000f-babe-4fd8-ad9e-64f2ec405724
Somani, B K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Robertson, A
436dd2ba-202e-4794-a817-bfb569417486
Healy, S
24afa19a-0068-4425-820d-ec53596c8ef0
Kata, S G
bb011d0d-01f0-4c99-ac40-e8db8d4ef4d0
May 2014
Chapman, R A
e74a000f-babe-4fd8-ad9e-64f2ec405724
Somani, B K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Robertson, A
436dd2ba-202e-4794-a817-bfb569417486
Healy, S
24afa19a-0068-4425-820d-ec53596c8ef0
Kata, S G
bb011d0d-01f0-4c99-ac40-e8db8d4ef4d0
Chapman, R A, Somani, B K, Robertson, A, Healy, S and Kata, S G
(2014)
Decreasing cost of flexible ureterorenoscopy: single-use laser fiber cost analysis.
Urology, 83 (5), .
(doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.019).
Abstract
Objective
To
demonstrate a cost benefit while using disposable laser fibers as
compared with reusable laser fibers. Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) is a
central component of endourology. It is vital that for service provision
and training purposes, costs are kept down while delivering this
service. Laser fibers are known to damage scopes causing high repair
and/or replacement costs.
Materials and Methods
Data
for consecutive FURS procedures during 2 periods in a single center
were compared. First, with the use of reusable fibers and second, with
single-use fibers. Cost of laser fibers and repairs was recorded. The
study excludes the cost of the initial purchase of the ureterorenoscopes
or the holmium laser equipment and costs associated with staffing and
hospital stay.
Results
The
total number of FURS carried out in period 1 and period 2 was 260 and
265, respectively. A total of 13 reusable (185 procedures) and 168
disposable laser fibers were used in these 2 periods, respectively.
There was a reduction in laser damaged ureteroscopes from 9 to 3 in the
second period. This resulted in a £16,800 reduction in repair cost. This
more than offsets the increased costs of single-use fibers.
Conclusion
On
the basis of our data, it is more cost-effective to use a disposable
laser fiber, as it prevents scope damage, which can happen because of
microfractures with repeated laser use. Moreover, this will also save
time and/or resource required with sterilization.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: May 2014
Keywords:
Costs and Cost Analysis, Disposable Equipment, Equipment Design, Humans, Kidney, Lasers, Time Factors, Ureteroscopes, Ureteroscopy, Comparative Study, Journal Article
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 419113
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419113
ISSN: 0090-4295
PURE UUID: 39ebe596-2c6d-4883-8413-6503e15fe81f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 19:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R A Chapman
Author:
A Robertson
Author:
S Healy
Author:
S G Kata
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics