The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Expedition 302 geophysics: integrating past data with new results

Expedition 302 geophysics: integrating past data with new results
Expedition 302 geophysics: integrating past data with new results
In preparation for IODP Expedition 302, Arctic Coring Expedition (ACEX), a site survey database comprising geophysical and geological data from the Lomonosov Ridge was compiled. The accumulated database includes data collected from ice islands, icebreakers, and submarines from 1961 to 2001. In addition, seismic reflection profiles were collected during Expedition 302 that complement the existing seismic reflection data and facilitate integration between the acoustic stratigraphy and the Expedition 302 drill cores. An overview of these data is presented in this chapter.
It is well recognized that collecting geophysical data in ice-covered seas, in particular the Arctic Ocean, is a challenging endeavor. This is because much of the Arctic Ocean is continuously covered with ice thicknesses that vary from 1 to 6 m. Over the continental shelves, sea ice can be absent during summer months, but it is present year-round in the central basins. This ice cover is the most dominant feature of the Arctic Ocean environment. It circulates in the ocean basin in two main circulation patterns: the Transpolar Drift and the Beaufort Gyre (see the "Expedition 302 summary" chapter; Rudels et al., 1996).
Expedition 302 sites are located within the less severe of these two ice circulation systems, the Transpolar Drift, which primarily moves sea ice from the shelves where it is formed (the Laptev and East Siberian Seas) across the basin and exits through the Fram Strait. During late summer, concentrations of Arctic sea ice can be <100% (10/10 ice cover), making it possible for icebreakers to operate. Average ice concentrations in the central Arctic Ocean during summer months can locally vary from partially open water (6/10) to completely ice covered (10/10). This sea-ice cover can move at speeds up to 0.5 kt.
Early Arctic Ocean geophysical exploration was performed from ice-drift stations (Weber and Roots, 1990). However, the tracks from these drifting ice stations were controlled "by the whims of nature" (Jackson et al., 1990), preventing detailed, systematic surveys of predetermined target areas. These ice-drift stations were set up on stable icebergs that were trapped in sea ice and moved generally with the large drift patterns, but locally they were erratic, so preselected locations could not be surveyed. In the late 1980s, single icebreakers began to be used for oceanographic survey work in the Arctic Ocean. Between 1991 and 2001, four scientific icebreaker expeditions to the Lomonosov Ridge took place. These cruises all experienced local sea-ice conditions varying between 8/10 and 10/10. During these expeditions, towed geophysical equipment was occasionally damaged or lost, either because of a rapidly closing wake caused by local ice pressure or because ice had cut the air gun array.
Conventionally powered icebreakers reached as far as the North Pole for the first time during the 1991 Expedition (Andersen and Carlsonn, 1992; Fütterer, 1992). Geophysical results from this expedition collected two important reflection profiles, AWI-91090 and AWI-91091, that crossed the Lomonosov Ridge between 87° and 88°N. These profiles imaged a ~450 m thick, well-stratified and apparently undisturbed drape of sediments overlying a prominent acoustic unconformity (Jokat et al., 1992) that spawned the idea to conduct a paleoceanographic drilling expedition to this Ridge.
The use of US Navy nuclear submarines for geophysical mapping was implemented through the Science Ice Exercise program (SCICEX) (Newton, 2000). The development of the Seafloor Characterization and Mapping Pods (SCAMP), which hold a Chirp subbottom profiler, swath bathymetric profiler, and side scan sonar, was an essential part of the SCICEX program (Chayes et al., 1996). In 1999, the Lomonosov Ridge geophysical database was augmented with acoustic data acquired during the SCICEX program using the SCAMP system mounted on the US nuclear submarine USS Hawkbill (Edwards and Coakley, 2003).
21pp
Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc
Jakobsson, M.
12b92f3c-a50e-494e-b912-7b622ca15c00
Flodén, T.
59f5b5eb-a1e3-44bb-95a8-f7af879c697a
Backman, J.
b2d77581-60c6-44fd-b61e-9dfbd85f2a8f
Moran, K.
4c2dc706-a00e-4ed4-b4d2-9792bdb56f2b
McInroy, D.
d402a306-8bc0-49cb-a36b-faa006c5ed22
Brinkhuis, H.K.
21dc23c3-977d-4f29-9f44-0582e6addd58
Clemens, S.
ebb0c524-b6d8-4a87-b75f-4d519c1ad235
Cronin, T.
26157730-f435-4c76-b7b4-48ad88941098
Dickens, G.R.
897e996c-6713-4e92-9a60-8a7d50c7b283
Eynaud, F.
2c8e3878-87fd-4533-b250-e032e6bb51ff
Gattacceca, J.
b6b9450e-73c5-4c19-9e0a-595809e16530
Jordan, R.W.
660fae82-f7e8-49ea-9d76-2276c163a5f3
Kaminski, M.
d030172a-348f-47b7-b967-1c1d5b6cdcab
King, J.
c28e1d73-7f6a-4e59-9354-bbba329f1b01
Koç, N.
8ed78151-9023-4e80-92cc-700ad7fa1992
Martinez, N.C.
244a77a6-e3c5-4605-9317-265c7d8491cb
Matthiessen, J.
e576155d-e3e3-48b1-afa8-f0dfba45af57
Moore, T.C.
7bbc9539-0103-4010-8a24-f31124baacfb
Onodera, J.
35492316-bdff-4350-a438-ef08785a81d6
O'Regan, M.
83b80486-4e18-4089-9b12-361232727095
Pälike, H.
b9bf7798-ad8c-479b-8487-dd9a30a61fa5
Rea, B.R.
8d964c93-27ee-4aeb-8e39-b9fc8f06985a
Rio, D.
9a2a4c17-dd25-4bec-85b3-8849e830ce62
Sakamoto, T.
66911552-cfee-46dc-847f-432e1da1d648
Smith, D.C.
536ad98e-9c71-4171-a7b5-51d796090e5d
Stein, R.
d5cd3873-cb2f-411f-9750-ff97d93a61b5
St. John, K.E.K.
cd3c6ea2-6191-407b-af91-435656790a79
Suto, I.
f020a6b3-1915-4966-a071-ff2a91c317b8
Suzuki, N.
f177438a-f646-4525-99a2-ec323e69bb64
Takahashi, K.
688388ae-ea43-48e0-a27e-e07871bc4915
Watanabe, M.
656540be-b22e-4841-9aab-7f10146d2e74
Yamamoto, M.
65a94f94-5427-4983-a54a-a1ac534e6b2a
Backman, J.
Moran, K.
McInroy, D.B.
Mayer, L.A.
Jakobsson, M.
12b92f3c-a50e-494e-b912-7b622ca15c00
Flodén, T.
59f5b5eb-a1e3-44bb-95a8-f7af879c697a
Backman, J.
b2d77581-60c6-44fd-b61e-9dfbd85f2a8f
Moran, K.
4c2dc706-a00e-4ed4-b4d2-9792bdb56f2b
McInroy, D.
d402a306-8bc0-49cb-a36b-faa006c5ed22
Brinkhuis, H.K.
21dc23c3-977d-4f29-9f44-0582e6addd58
Clemens, S.
ebb0c524-b6d8-4a87-b75f-4d519c1ad235
Cronin, T.
26157730-f435-4c76-b7b4-48ad88941098
Dickens, G.R.
897e996c-6713-4e92-9a60-8a7d50c7b283
Eynaud, F.
2c8e3878-87fd-4533-b250-e032e6bb51ff
Gattacceca, J.
b6b9450e-73c5-4c19-9e0a-595809e16530
Jordan, R.W.
660fae82-f7e8-49ea-9d76-2276c163a5f3
Kaminski, M.
d030172a-348f-47b7-b967-1c1d5b6cdcab
King, J.
c28e1d73-7f6a-4e59-9354-bbba329f1b01
Koç, N.
8ed78151-9023-4e80-92cc-700ad7fa1992
Martinez, N.C.
244a77a6-e3c5-4605-9317-265c7d8491cb
Matthiessen, J.
e576155d-e3e3-48b1-afa8-f0dfba45af57
Moore, T.C.
7bbc9539-0103-4010-8a24-f31124baacfb
Onodera, J.
35492316-bdff-4350-a438-ef08785a81d6
O'Regan, M.
83b80486-4e18-4089-9b12-361232727095
Pälike, H.
b9bf7798-ad8c-479b-8487-dd9a30a61fa5
Rea, B.R.
8d964c93-27ee-4aeb-8e39-b9fc8f06985a
Rio, D.
9a2a4c17-dd25-4bec-85b3-8849e830ce62
Sakamoto, T.
66911552-cfee-46dc-847f-432e1da1d648
Smith, D.C.
536ad98e-9c71-4171-a7b5-51d796090e5d
Stein, R.
d5cd3873-cb2f-411f-9750-ff97d93a61b5
St. John, K.E.K.
cd3c6ea2-6191-407b-af91-435656790a79
Suto, I.
f020a6b3-1915-4966-a071-ff2a91c317b8
Suzuki, N.
f177438a-f646-4525-99a2-ec323e69bb64
Takahashi, K.
688388ae-ea43-48e0-a27e-e07871bc4915
Watanabe, M.
656540be-b22e-4841-9aab-7f10146d2e74
Yamamoto, M.
65a94f94-5427-4983-a54a-a1ac534e6b2a
Backman, J.
Moran, K.
McInroy, D.B.
Mayer, L.A.

Jakobsson, M., Flodén, T., Backman, J., Moran, K., McInroy, D., Brinkhuis, H.K., Clemens, S., Cronin, T., Dickens, G.R., Eynaud, F., Gattacceca, J., Jordan, R.W., Kaminski, M., King, J., Koç, N., Martinez, N.C., Matthiessen, J., Moore, T.C., Onodera, J., O'Regan, M., Pälike, H., Rea, B.R., Rio, D., Sakamoto, T., Smith, D.C., Stein, R., St. John, K.E.K., Suto, I., Suzuki, N., Takahashi, K., Watanabe, M. and Yamamoto, M. (2006) Expedition 302 geophysics: integrating past data with new results. Backman, J., Moran, K., McInroy, D.B. and Mayer, L.A. (eds.) In Proceedings of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, Vol. 302. Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc. 21pp . (doi:10.2204/iodp.proc.302.102.2006).

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

In preparation for IODP Expedition 302, Arctic Coring Expedition (ACEX), a site survey database comprising geophysical and geological data from the Lomonosov Ridge was compiled. The accumulated database includes data collected from ice islands, icebreakers, and submarines from 1961 to 2001. In addition, seismic reflection profiles were collected during Expedition 302 that complement the existing seismic reflection data and facilitate integration between the acoustic stratigraphy and the Expedition 302 drill cores. An overview of these data is presented in this chapter.
It is well recognized that collecting geophysical data in ice-covered seas, in particular the Arctic Ocean, is a challenging endeavor. This is because much of the Arctic Ocean is continuously covered with ice thicknesses that vary from 1 to 6 m. Over the continental shelves, sea ice can be absent during summer months, but it is present year-round in the central basins. This ice cover is the most dominant feature of the Arctic Ocean environment. It circulates in the ocean basin in two main circulation patterns: the Transpolar Drift and the Beaufort Gyre (see the "Expedition 302 summary" chapter; Rudels et al., 1996).
Expedition 302 sites are located within the less severe of these two ice circulation systems, the Transpolar Drift, which primarily moves sea ice from the shelves where it is formed (the Laptev and East Siberian Seas) across the basin and exits through the Fram Strait. During late summer, concentrations of Arctic sea ice can be <100% (10/10 ice cover), making it possible for icebreakers to operate. Average ice concentrations in the central Arctic Ocean during summer months can locally vary from partially open water (6/10) to completely ice covered (10/10). This sea-ice cover can move at speeds up to 0.5 kt.
Early Arctic Ocean geophysical exploration was performed from ice-drift stations (Weber and Roots, 1990). However, the tracks from these drifting ice stations were controlled "by the whims of nature" (Jackson et al., 1990), preventing detailed, systematic surveys of predetermined target areas. These ice-drift stations were set up on stable icebergs that were trapped in sea ice and moved generally with the large drift patterns, but locally they were erratic, so preselected locations could not be surveyed. In the late 1980s, single icebreakers began to be used for oceanographic survey work in the Arctic Ocean. Between 1991 and 2001, four scientific icebreaker expeditions to the Lomonosov Ridge took place. These cruises all experienced local sea-ice conditions varying between 8/10 and 10/10. During these expeditions, towed geophysical equipment was occasionally damaged or lost, either because of a rapidly closing wake caused by local ice pressure or because ice had cut the air gun array.
Conventionally powered icebreakers reached as far as the North Pole for the first time during the 1991 Expedition (Andersen and Carlsonn, 1992; Fütterer, 1992). Geophysical results from this expedition collected two important reflection profiles, AWI-91090 and AWI-91091, that crossed the Lomonosov Ridge between 87° and 88°N. These profiles imaged a ~450 m thick, well-stratified and apparently undisturbed drape of sediments overlying a prominent acoustic unconformity (Jokat et al., 1992) that spawned the idea to conduct a paleoceanographic drilling expedition to this Ridge.
The use of US Navy nuclear submarines for geophysical mapping was implemented through the Science Ice Exercise program (SCICEX) (Newton, 2000). The development of the Seafloor Characterization and Mapping Pods (SCAMP), which hold a Chirp subbottom profiler, swath bathymetric profiler, and side scan sonar, was an essential part of the SCICEX program (Chayes et al., 1996). In 1999, the Lomonosov Ridge geophysical database was augmented with acoustic data acquired during the SCICEX program using the SCAMP system mounted on the US nuclear submarine USS Hawkbill (Edwards and Coakley, 2003).

Other
302_102.PDF - Version of Record
Download (12MB)

More information

Published date: 7 March 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 41915
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/41915
PURE UUID: 52ee2e5e-8724-4482-a959-07ee335a8bea

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Oct 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M. Jakobsson
Author: T. Flodén
Author: J. Backman
Author: K. Moran
Author: D. McInroy
Author: H.K. Brinkhuis
Author: S. Clemens
Author: T. Cronin
Author: G.R. Dickens
Author: F. Eynaud
Author: J. Gattacceca
Author: R.W. Jordan
Author: M. Kaminski
Author: J. King
Author: N. Koç
Author: N.C. Martinez
Author: J. Matthiessen
Author: T.C. Moore
Author: J. Onodera
Author: M. O'Regan
Author: H. Pälike
Author: B.R. Rea
Author: D. Rio
Author: T. Sakamoto
Author: D.C. Smith
Author: R. Stein
Author: K.E.K. St. John
Author: I. Suto
Author: N. Suzuki
Author: K. Takahashi
Author: M. Watanabe
Author: M. Yamamoto
Editor: J. Backman
Editor: K. Moran
Editor: D.B. McInroy
Editor: L.A. Mayer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×