The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of adopting the 2013 World Health Organization criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort: a prospective study

Impact of adopting the 2013 World Health Organization criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort: a prospective study
Impact of adopting the 2013 World Health Organization criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort: a prospective study

Background:

We assessed the impact of adopting the 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria on the rates of gestational diabetes (GDM), pregnancy outcomes and identification of women at future risk of type 2 diabetes.

Methods:

During a period when the 1999 WHO GDM criteria were in effect, pregnant women were universally screened using a one-step 75 g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 26–28 weeks’ gestation. Women were retrospectively reclassified according to the 2013 criteria, but without the 1-h glycaemia measurement. Pregnancy outcomes and glucose tolerance at 4–5 years post-delivery were compared for women with GDM classified by the 1999 criteria alone, GDM by the 2013 criteria alone, GDM by both criteria and without GDM by both sets of criteria.

Results:

Of 1092 women, 204 (18.7%) and 142 (13.0%) were diagnosed with GDM by the 1999 and 2013 WHO criteria, respectively, with 27 (2.5%) reclassified to GDM and 89 (8.2%) reclassified to non-GDM when shifting from the 1999 to 2013 criteria. Compared to women without GDM by both criteria, cases reclassified to GDM by the 2013 criteria had an increased risk of neonatal jaundice requiring phototherapy (relative risk (RR) = 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32, 5.86); despite receiving treatment for GDM, cases reclassified to non-GDM by the 2013 criteria had higher risks of prematurity (RR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.12, 4.24), neonatal hypoglycaemia (RR = 3.42, 95% CI 1.04, 11.29), jaundice requiring phototherapy (RR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.04, 2.82), and a higher rate of abnormal glucose tolerance at 4–5 years post-delivery (RR = 3.39, 95% CI 2.30, 5.00).

Conclusions:

Adoption of the 2013 WHO criteria, without the 1-h glycaemia measurement, reduced the GDM rate. Lowering the fasting glucose threshold identified women who might benefit from treatment, but raising the 2-h threshold may fail to identify women at increased risk of adverse pregnancy and future metabolic outcomes.
1471-2393
Chi, Claudia
73d7a61a-49a7-4475-95d1-2f1b0d074774
Loy, See
7bba8090-b65a-4ad8-b3cb-b922b6762fc3
Chan, Shiao-Yng
3c9d8970-2cc4-430a-86a7-96f6029a5293
Choong, Cherie
e9627b21-1597-49f7-a304-15f4d68ae26e
Cai, Shirong
0d23d2c5-889d-4f33-887f-b52e3d341ba4
Soh, Shu E.
00a5ad13-4c5b-4fad-aaa9-d080d9aa63e8
Tan, Kok Hian
4714c94d-334a-42ad-b879-f3aa3a931def
Yap, Fabian
22f6b954-31fc-4696-a52b-e985a424b95b
Gluckman, Peter D.
e916630e-5ae2-437c-a1d1-8e24c0e05589
Godfrey, Keith
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd
Shek, Lynette
9a77403c-0e0c-4536-a5ad-628ce94b279a
Chan, Jerry K.Y.
2d78152d-94ae-4bb7-a040-eaa6fbd4e9b3
Kramer, Michael S.
89f86ceb-c49e-4402-a1e3-d79c406c178d
Chong, Yap Seng
7043124b-e892-4d4b-8bb7-6d35ed94e136
Chi, Claudia
73d7a61a-49a7-4475-95d1-2f1b0d074774
Loy, See
7bba8090-b65a-4ad8-b3cb-b922b6762fc3
Chan, Shiao-Yng
3c9d8970-2cc4-430a-86a7-96f6029a5293
Choong, Cherie
e9627b21-1597-49f7-a304-15f4d68ae26e
Cai, Shirong
0d23d2c5-889d-4f33-887f-b52e3d341ba4
Soh, Shu E.
00a5ad13-4c5b-4fad-aaa9-d080d9aa63e8
Tan, Kok Hian
4714c94d-334a-42ad-b879-f3aa3a931def
Yap, Fabian
22f6b954-31fc-4696-a52b-e985a424b95b
Gluckman, Peter D.
e916630e-5ae2-437c-a1d1-8e24c0e05589
Godfrey, Keith
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd
Shek, Lynette
9a77403c-0e0c-4536-a5ad-628ce94b279a
Chan, Jerry K.Y.
2d78152d-94ae-4bb7-a040-eaa6fbd4e9b3
Kramer, Michael S.
89f86ceb-c49e-4402-a1e3-d79c406c178d
Chong, Yap Seng
7043124b-e892-4d4b-8bb7-6d35ed94e136

Chi, Claudia, Loy, See, Chan, Shiao-Yng, Choong, Cherie, Cai, Shirong, Soh, Shu E., Tan, Kok Hian, Yap, Fabian, Gluckman, Peter D., Godfrey, Keith, Shek, Lynette, Chan, Jerry K.Y., Kramer, Michael S. and Chong, Yap Seng (2018) Impact of adopting the 2013 World Health Organization criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort: a prospective study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18, [69]. (doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1707-3).

Record type: Article

Abstract


Background:

We assessed the impact of adopting the 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria on the rates of gestational diabetes (GDM), pregnancy outcomes and identification of women at future risk of type 2 diabetes.

Methods:

During a period when the 1999 WHO GDM criteria were in effect, pregnant women were universally screened using a one-step 75 g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 26–28 weeks’ gestation. Women were retrospectively reclassified according to the 2013 criteria, but without the 1-h glycaemia measurement. Pregnancy outcomes and glucose tolerance at 4–5 years post-delivery were compared for women with GDM classified by the 1999 criteria alone, GDM by the 2013 criteria alone, GDM by both criteria and without GDM by both sets of criteria.

Results:

Of 1092 women, 204 (18.7%) and 142 (13.0%) were diagnosed with GDM by the 1999 and 2013 WHO criteria, respectively, with 27 (2.5%) reclassified to GDM and 89 (8.2%) reclassified to non-GDM when shifting from the 1999 to 2013 criteria. Compared to women without GDM by both criteria, cases reclassified to GDM by the 2013 criteria had an increased risk of neonatal jaundice requiring phototherapy (relative risk (RR) = 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32, 5.86); despite receiving treatment for GDM, cases reclassified to non-GDM by the 2013 criteria had higher risks of prematurity (RR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.12, 4.24), neonatal hypoglycaemia (RR = 3.42, 95% CI 1.04, 11.29), jaundice requiring phototherapy (RR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.04, 2.82), and a higher rate of abnormal glucose tolerance at 4–5 years post-delivery (RR = 3.39, 95% CI 2.30, 5.00).

Conclusions:

Adoption of the 2013 WHO criteria, without the 1-h glycaemia measurement, reduced the GDM rate. Lowering the fasting glucose threshold identified women who might benefit from treatment, but raising the 2-h threshold may fail to identify women at increased risk of adverse pregnancy and future metabolic outcomes.

Text
gdm reclass paper BMC_revision_clean 26Feb2018 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
document-1 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (466kB)
Text
additional file 1
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (13kB)
Request a copy
Text
additional file 2
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (12kB)
Request a copy
Text
additional file 3
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (12kB)
Request a copy

Show all 5 downloads.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 March 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 March 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 419224
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419224
ISSN: 1471-2393
PURE UUID: bc2c7e88-af59-47ee-a40b-dbb4b189c8c0
ORCID for Keith Godfrey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4643-0618

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Claudia Chi
Author: See Loy
Author: Shiao-Yng Chan
Author: Cherie Choong
Author: Shirong Cai
Author: Shu E. Soh
Author: Kok Hian Tan
Author: Fabian Yap
Author: Peter D. Gluckman
Author: Keith Godfrey ORCID iD
Author: Lynette Shek
Author: Jerry K.Y. Chan
Author: Michael S. Kramer
Author: Yap Seng Chong

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×