Prostatic urethral lift vs prostate arterial embolization: novel nonablative strategies in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia
Prostatic urethral lift vs prostate arterial embolization: novel nonablative strategies in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia
Prostate urethral lift and prostate arterial embolization represent two evolving techniques with contrasting mechanisms of action (mechanical decompression vs angiographic embolization). Both yield relief of lower urinary tract symptoms over a period of several weeks. They display similar safety profiles with self-limiting pelvic discomfort characterizing the commonest minor adverse event. Both procedures have the potential to be carried out under local anesthesia and in the outpatient setting with suitability for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. Neither has been found to cause degradation of sexual function. Further randomized studies are needed to delineate the formal position of these techniques in the surgical management of benign prostate hyperplasia.
Disease Management, Embolization, Therapeutic, Humans, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Male, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Prostate, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Urethra, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Journal Article, Review
11-17
Jones, Patrick
d27beb5b-0e09-4ed5-89f0-6c62421c2397
Rai, Bhavan Prasad
e1156207-bfd1-4f89-b0aa-9e55fc54235b
Aboumarzouk, Omar M
3c7e2433-638d-4378-9931-902fdc68acce
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
January 2016
Jones, Patrick
d27beb5b-0e09-4ed5-89f0-6c62421c2397
Rai, Bhavan Prasad
e1156207-bfd1-4f89-b0aa-9e55fc54235b
Aboumarzouk, Omar M
3c7e2433-638d-4378-9931-902fdc68acce
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Jones, Patrick, Rai, Bhavan Prasad, Aboumarzouk, Omar M and Somani, Bhaskar K
(2016)
Prostatic urethral lift vs prostate arterial embolization: novel nonablative strategies in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia.
Urology, 87, .
(doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.005).
Abstract
Prostate urethral lift and prostate arterial embolization represent two evolving techniques with contrasting mechanisms of action (mechanical decompression vs angiographic embolization). Both yield relief of lower urinary tract symptoms over a period of several weeks. They display similar safety profiles with self-limiting pelvic discomfort characterizing the commonest minor adverse event. Both procedures have the potential to be carried out under local anesthesia and in the outpatient setting with suitability for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. Neither has been found to cause degradation of sexual function. Further randomized studies are needed to delineate the formal position of these techniques in the surgical management of benign prostate hyperplasia.
Text
Urolift vs PAE
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Published date: January 2016
Keywords:
Disease Management, Embolization, Therapeutic, Humans, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Male, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Prostate, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Urethra, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Journal Article, Review
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 419248
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419248
ISSN: 0090-4295
PURE UUID: e04ddc63-054c-43c1-b76b-f8f29b017f16
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:24
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Patrick Jones
Author:
Bhavan Prasad Rai
Author:
Omar M Aboumarzouk
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics