The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Recent trends in postcystectomy health-related Quality of Life (QoL) favors neobladder diversion: Systematic Review of the Literature

Recent trends in postcystectomy health-related Quality of Life (QoL) favors neobladder diversion: Systematic Review of the Literature
Recent trends in postcystectomy health-related Quality of Life (QoL) favors neobladder diversion: Systematic Review of the Literature

The study aims to review the current evidence for quality of life posturinary diversion surgery comparing neobladder to other types of diversion. A review of literature from inception to July 2015 for all English-language articles was done. Based on our inclusion criteria, 22 studies (2450 patients) were included. Whereas none of the prospective studies showed any quality of life (QoL) advantage with ileal conduit diversion, 3 of the 5 prospective studies and 4 of the 6 studies published after 2011 show better QoL outcomes with neobladder than other urinary diversion types. All prospective studies published after 2011 have shown neobladder to have superior QoL outcomes than its comparators. Recent trends indicate that orthotopic neobladder postcystectomy is associated with better QoL outcomes compared to other urinary diversion types.

Cystectomy, Humans, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Urinary Diversion, Urinary Reservoirs, Continent, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Review
0090-4295
22-26
Ghosh, Anngona
3c5a161a-32d1-4285-b740-5db138f9610d
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Ghosh, Anngona
3c5a161a-32d1-4285-b740-5db138f9610d
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9

Ghosh, Anngona and Somani, Bhaskar K (2016) Recent trends in postcystectomy health-related Quality of Life (QoL) favors neobladder diversion: Systematic Review of the Literature. Urology, 93, 22-26. (doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.079).

Record type: Review

Abstract

The study aims to review the current evidence for quality of life posturinary diversion surgery comparing neobladder to other types of diversion. A review of literature from inception to July 2015 for all English-language articles was done. Based on our inclusion criteria, 22 studies (2450 patients) were included. Whereas none of the prospective studies showed any quality of life (QoL) advantage with ileal conduit diversion, 3 of the 5 prospective studies and 4 of the 6 studies published after 2011 show better QoL outcomes with neobladder than other urinary diversion types. All prospective studies published after 2011 have shown neobladder to have superior QoL outcomes than its comparators. Recent trends indicate that orthotopic neobladder postcystectomy is associated with better QoL outcomes compared to other urinary diversion types.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 2016
Keywords: Cystectomy, Humans, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Urinary Diversion, Urinary Reservoirs, Continent, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Review

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 419254
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419254
ISSN: 0090-4295
PURE UUID: 293b147e-3fec-4c28-9afc-be2f08f49125

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 19:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anngona Ghosh

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×