Scour and sedimentation of submarine pipelines: closing the gap between laboratory experiments and field conditions
Scour and sedimentation of submarine pipelines: closing the gap between laboratory experiments and field conditions
Predicting changes to subsea pipeline embedment due to sediment mobility is critical to many aspects of pipeline design, including on-bottom stability, thermal management, fatigue analysis and flow assurance. Motivated by this requirement, significant advances have been made over the last few decades in understanding the mechanisms of pipeline scour and sedimentation. This has led to the development of predictive models and formulas, based predominantly on laboratory experiments. However, despite these developments uncertainties still remain in predicting scour and sedimentation in actual field conditions. One reason for this continued uncertainty is that previous laboratory experiments have often focused on idealised testing conditions, consisting of uniform sandy sediments and steady or stationary near-bed current and wave velocities. Although these idealised conditions enable systematic studies, they are not representative of the range in marine sediments and metocean conditions observed in practice; hence extrapolation is necessary. A second reason for uncertainty is that there has only been limited comparison of laboratory results with field data, and so quantitative validation is lacking. Noting these areas of uncertainty, in this paper we review a collection of recent studies completed at the University of Western Australia (UWA) which each aim to close the gap between laboratory experiments and actual field conditions, and therefore reduce uncertainty in predicting changes in scour and sedimentation in the field. These studies focus on three aspects of work: (i) the effect of variations in marine sediment properties on the rate of pipeline scour; (ii) the effect of time-varying seabed velocities on pipeline scour; and (iii) comparisons of laboratory based estimates of scour and sedimentation with field data. In each study an emphasis is placed on developing reliable predictive models and formulas that better represent field conditions, or are validated against field observations. It is argued that these models allow for improved predictions of pipeline scour and sedimentation, and may be used to form a rational design approach for subsea pipelines.
11-28
Draper, S.
0f43dd70-abdf-4ba3-a9e0-6b4ba932b61e
Cheng, L.
b7521676-ae15-43d9-8358-153b46980c15
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
2016
Draper, S.
0f43dd70-abdf-4ba3-a9e0-6b4ba932b61e
Cheng, L.
b7521676-ae15-43d9-8358-153b46980c15
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Draper, S., Cheng, L. and White, D.J.
(2016)
Scour and sedimentation of submarine pipelines: closing the gap between laboratory experiments and field conditions.
Harris, John, Whitehouse, Richard and Moxon, Sarah
(eds.)
In Scour and Erosion: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, ICSE 2016.
CRC Press / Balkema.
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Predicting changes to subsea pipeline embedment due to sediment mobility is critical to many aspects of pipeline design, including on-bottom stability, thermal management, fatigue analysis and flow assurance. Motivated by this requirement, significant advances have been made over the last few decades in understanding the mechanisms of pipeline scour and sedimentation. This has led to the development of predictive models and formulas, based predominantly on laboratory experiments. However, despite these developments uncertainties still remain in predicting scour and sedimentation in actual field conditions. One reason for this continued uncertainty is that previous laboratory experiments have often focused on idealised testing conditions, consisting of uniform sandy sediments and steady or stationary near-bed current and wave velocities. Although these idealised conditions enable systematic studies, they are not representative of the range in marine sediments and metocean conditions observed in practice; hence extrapolation is necessary. A second reason for uncertainty is that there has only been limited comparison of laboratory results with field data, and so quantitative validation is lacking. Noting these areas of uncertainty, in this paper we review a collection of recent studies completed at the University of Western Australia (UWA) which each aim to close the gap between laboratory experiments and actual field conditions, and therefore reduce uncertainty in predicting changes in scour and sedimentation in the field. These studies focus on three aspects of work: (i) the effect of variations in marine sediment properties on the rate of pipeline scour; (ii) the effect of time-varying seabed velocities on pipeline scour; and (iii) comparisons of laboratory based estimates of scour and sedimentation with field data. In each study an emphasis is placed on developing reliable predictive models and formulas that better represent field conditions, or are validated against field observations. It is argued that these models allow for improved predictions of pipeline scour and sedimentation, and may be used to form a rational design approach for subsea pipelines.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2016
Venue - Dates:
8th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, ICSE 2016, , Oxford, United Kingdom, 2016-09-12 - 2016-09-15
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 419393
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419393
PURE UUID: b2969f3d-0ed3-4195-8d20-d24dad3a369e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:42
Export record
Contributors
Author:
S. Draper
Author:
L. Cheng
Editor:
John Harris
Editor:
Richard Whitehouse
Editor:
Sarah Moxon
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics