The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Scour and sedimentation of submarine pipelines: closing the gap between laboratory experiments and field conditions

Scour and sedimentation of submarine pipelines: closing the gap between laboratory experiments and field conditions
Scour and sedimentation of submarine pipelines: closing the gap between laboratory experiments and field conditions

Predicting changes to subsea pipeline embedment due to sediment mobility is critical to many aspects of pipeline design, including on-bottom stability, thermal management, fatigue analysis and flow assurance. Motivated by this requirement, significant advances have been made over the last few decades in understanding the mechanisms of pipeline scour and sedimentation. This has led to the development of predictive models and formulas, based predominantly on laboratory experiments. However, despite these developments uncertainties still remain in predicting scour and sedimentation in actual field conditions. One reason for this continued uncertainty is that previous laboratory experiments have often focused on idealised testing conditions, consisting of uniform sandy sediments and steady or stationary near-bed current and wave velocities. Although these idealised conditions enable systematic studies, they are not representative of the range in marine sediments and metocean conditions observed in practice; hence extrapolation is necessary. A second reason for uncertainty is that there has only been limited comparison of laboratory results with field data, and so quantitative validation is lacking. Noting these areas of uncertainty, in this paper we review a collection of recent studies completed at the University of Western Australia (UWA) which each aim to close the gap between laboratory experiments and actual field conditions, and therefore reduce uncertainty in predicting changes in scour and sedimentation in the field. These studies focus on three aspects of work: (i) the effect of variations in marine sediment properties on the rate of pipeline scour; (ii) the effect of time-varying seabed velocities on pipeline scour; and (iii) comparisons of laboratory based estimates of scour and sedimentation with field data. In each study an emphasis is placed on developing reliable predictive models and formulas that better represent field conditions, or are validated against field observations. It is argued that these models allow for improved predictions of pipeline scour and sedimentation, and may be used to form a rational design approach for subsea pipelines.

11-28
CRC Press / Balkema
Draper, S.
0f43dd70-abdf-4ba3-a9e0-6b4ba932b61e
Cheng, L.
b7521676-ae15-43d9-8358-153b46980c15
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Harris, John
Whitehouse, Richard
Moxon, Sarah
Draper, S.
0f43dd70-abdf-4ba3-a9e0-6b4ba932b61e
Cheng, L.
b7521676-ae15-43d9-8358-153b46980c15
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Harris, John
Whitehouse, Richard
Moxon, Sarah

Draper, S., Cheng, L. and White, D.J. (2016) Scour and sedimentation of submarine pipelines: closing the gap between laboratory experiments and field conditions. Harris, John, Whitehouse, Richard and Moxon, Sarah (eds.) In Scour and Erosion: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, ICSE 2016. CRC Press / Balkema. pp. 11-28 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Predicting changes to subsea pipeline embedment due to sediment mobility is critical to many aspects of pipeline design, including on-bottom stability, thermal management, fatigue analysis and flow assurance. Motivated by this requirement, significant advances have been made over the last few decades in understanding the mechanisms of pipeline scour and sedimentation. This has led to the development of predictive models and formulas, based predominantly on laboratory experiments. However, despite these developments uncertainties still remain in predicting scour and sedimentation in actual field conditions. One reason for this continued uncertainty is that previous laboratory experiments have often focused on idealised testing conditions, consisting of uniform sandy sediments and steady or stationary near-bed current and wave velocities. Although these idealised conditions enable systematic studies, they are not representative of the range in marine sediments and metocean conditions observed in practice; hence extrapolation is necessary. A second reason for uncertainty is that there has only been limited comparison of laboratory results with field data, and so quantitative validation is lacking. Noting these areas of uncertainty, in this paper we review a collection of recent studies completed at the University of Western Australia (UWA) which each aim to close the gap between laboratory experiments and actual field conditions, and therefore reduce uncertainty in predicting changes in scour and sedimentation in the field. These studies focus on three aspects of work: (i) the effect of variations in marine sediment properties on the rate of pipeline scour; (ii) the effect of time-varying seabed velocities on pipeline scour; and (iii) comparisons of laboratory based estimates of scour and sedimentation with field data. In each study an emphasis is placed on developing reliable predictive models and formulas that better represent field conditions, or are validated against field observations. It is argued that these models allow for improved predictions of pipeline scour and sedimentation, and may be used to form a rational design approach for subsea pipelines.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2016
Venue - Dates: 8th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, ICSE 2016, , Oxford, United Kingdom, 2016-09-12 - 2016-09-15

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 419393
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419393
PURE UUID: b2969f3d-0ed3-4195-8d20-d24dad3a369e
ORCID for D.J. White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-582X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:42

Export record

Contributors

Author: S. Draper
Author: L. Cheng
Author: D.J. White ORCID iD
Editor: John Harris
Editor: Richard Whitehouse
Editor: Sarah Moxon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×