The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Individual differences in dynamic visual search

Individual differences in dynamic visual search
Individual differences in dynamic visual search
Many real-world tasks involve interacting with a range of electronic visual displays. Maintaining rapid and accurate performance on such tasks may be difficult due to situational stress, time-pressure, and an awareness of high error-costs. In a typical visual search, relevant target items must be identified amongst irrelevant distractors, but in a dynamic display all of these stimuli may undergo change. Much of the literature on visual search and monitoring examines static arrays and scenes, but dynamic displays present a more complex problem that involves greater demands on sustained attention and higher levels of both spatial and temporal uncertainty. The present thesis investigates visual search and monitoring using a novel dynamic search task and examines some of the individual factors that influence performance on this task. Chapter 1 provides a general introduction and review of the literature on visual search, relevant individual factors and two potentially beneficial interventions. Chapter 2 introduces and characterises a novel dynamic search task and, across three experiments, demonstrates predictive monitoring and the importance of individual differences in verbal working memory capacity and intolerance of uncertainty in accounting for variation in search performance. Chapter 3 shows that working memory training and transcranial direct current stimulation were not effective in improving search performance, but does reveal that target prevalence influenced target detection, predictive monitoring and the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and search performance. Chapter 4 demonstrates similarities in the monitoring of colour and numerical information and shows that the need to search for a second category of target can have a negative impact on search performance and predictive monitoring. Finally, Chapter 5 summarises the findings from the empirical work in the preceding chapters and identifies a number of important theoretical and practical implications. Further work should continue to examine the contribution of individual variation in cognitive, personality and psychopathological traits to performance in complex visual tasks.
University of Southampton
Muhl-Richardson, Alexander
cae358b4-7761-4b36-8de3-98ba1b7254c0
Muhl-Richardson, Alexander
cae358b4-7761-4b36-8de3-98ba1b7254c0
Hadwin, Julie
a364caf0-405a-42f3-a04c-4864817393ee
Garner, Matthew
3221c5b3-b951-4fec-b456-ec449e4ce072
Donnelly, Nicholas
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b

Muhl-Richardson, Alexander (2017) Individual differences in dynamic visual search. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 227pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Many real-world tasks involve interacting with a range of electronic visual displays. Maintaining rapid and accurate performance on such tasks may be difficult due to situational stress, time-pressure, and an awareness of high error-costs. In a typical visual search, relevant target items must be identified amongst irrelevant distractors, but in a dynamic display all of these stimuli may undergo change. Much of the literature on visual search and monitoring examines static arrays and scenes, but dynamic displays present a more complex problem that involves greater demands on sustained attention and higher levels of both spatial and temporal uncertainty. The present thesis investigates visual search and monitoring using a novel dynamic search task and examines some of the individual factors that influence performance on this task. Chapter 1 provides a general introduction and review of the literature on visual search, relevant individual factors and two potentially beneficial interventions. Chapter 2 introduces and characterises a novel dynamic search task and, across three experiments, demonstrates predictive monitoring and the importance of individual differences in verbal working memory capacity and intolerance of uncertainty in accounting for variation in search performance. Chapter 3 shows that working memory training and transcranial direct current stimulation were not effective in improving search performance, but does reveal that target prevalence influenced target detection, predictive monitoring and the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and search performance. Chapter 4 demonstrates similarities in the monitoring of colour and numerical information and shows that the need to search for a second category of target can have a negative impact on search performance and predictive monitoring. Finally, Chapter 5 summarises the findings from the empirical work in the preceding chapters and identifies a number of important theoretical and practical implications. Further work should continue to examine the contribution of individual variation in cognitive, personality and psychopathological traits to performance in complex visual tasks.

Text
Individual Differences in Dynamic Visual Search - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: September 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 419471
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419471
PURE UUID: 739f3f57-a977-427f-9d13-0ab13182db20
ORCID for Matthew Garner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-2226

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:23

Export record

Contributors

Author: Alexander Muhl-Richardson
Thesis advisor: Julie Hadwin
Thesis advisor: Matthew Garner ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Nicholas Donnelly

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×