The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Simple prediction of the undrained displacement of a circular surface foundation on non-linear soil

Simple prediction of the undrained displacement of a circular surface foundation on non-linear soil
Simple prediction of the undrained displacement of a circular surface foundation on non-linear soil

Textbooks and university courses teach elasticity and plasticity as separate methods for analysing the stiffness and strength of a shallow foundation. The behaviour of real soil is neither linear elastic nor perfectly plastic. In this paper, two simple techniques for incorporating nonlinearity in routine design have been validated using finite element (FE) analysis. These two techniques - Atkinson's method and the mobilisable strength design (MSD) approach-assume that the responses of an individual soil element and the boundary value problem being considered are self-similar. Using this assumption, the soil element response can be scaled to predict the response of the boundary value problem. Atkinson's method is based on elasticity whereas MSD uses plasticity. Non-linearity has been captured in the FE analysis using a power law soil model. This approach uses minimal parameters, but is shown to capture accurately the undrained stress-strain response of typical clays under monotonie loading. Comparison with elastic and plastic solutions showed that the FE analysis was accurate to within <5% at the elastic and plastic extremes of the loading range. The responses of the soil and the boundary value problem are shown to be sufficiently self-similar up to two-thirds of the failure load for the foundation response to be predicted simply by a linear scaling of the soil response. Previously reported scaling factors for vertical loading are confirmed, and new factors for horizontal and moment loading are derived. These results show that, for this particular boundary value problem, soil non-linearity can be captured with sufficient accuracy for routine design, without recourse to sophisticated numerical analysis. These self-similarity methods are simple enough to be taught to undergraduates, and could be incorporated in textbooks alongside the core sections on elasticity and plasticity, providing guidance on the application of these techniques to real non-linear soil.

Clays, Deformation, Design, Footings/foundations, Soil/structure interaction
0016-8505
729-737
Osman, A.S.
880ea3e7-f6d4-44f3-9d90-7129ce356e5b
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Britto, A.M.
fe70fc78-ed50-4952-8ecc-f7e70746a64d
Bolton, M.D.
9fbf6ba8-1095-4220-a7f6-38f5463a58e7
Osman, A.S.
880ea3e7-f6d4-44f3-9d90-7129ce356e5b
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Britto, A.M.
fe70fc78-ed50-4952-8ecc-f7e70746a64d
Bolton, M.D.
9fbf6ba8-1095-4220-a7f6-38f5463a58e7

Osman, A.S., White, D.J., Britto, A.M. and Bolton, M.D. (2007) Simple prediction of the undrained displacement of a circular surface foundation on non-linear soil. Geotechnique, 57 (9), 729-737. (doi:10.1680/geot.2007.57.9.729).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Textbooks and university courses teach elasticity and plasticity as separate methods for analysing the stiffness and strength of a shallow foundation. The behaviour of real soil is neither linear elastic nor perfectly plastic. In this paper, two simple techniques for incorporating nonlinearity in routine design have been validated using finite element (FE) analysis. These two techniques - Atkinson's method and the mobilisable strength design (MSD) approach-assume that the responses of an individual soil element and the boundary value problem being considered are self-similar. Using this assumption, the soil element response can be scaled to predict the response of the boundary value problem. Atkinson's method is based on elasticity whereas MSD uses plasticity. Non-linearity has been captured in the FE analysis using a power law soil model. This approach uses minimal parameters, but is shown to capture accurately the undrained stress-strain response of typical clays under monotonie loading. Comparison with elastic and plastic solutions showed that the FE analysis was accurate to within <5% at the elastic and plastic extremes of the loading range. The responses of the soil and the boundary value problem are shown to be sufficiently self-similar up to two-thirds of the failure load for the foundation response to be predicted simply by a linear scaling of the soil response. Previously reported scaling factors for vertical loading are confirmed, and new factors for horizontal and moment loading are derived. These results show that, for this particular boundary value problem, soil non-linearity can be captured with sufficient accuracy for routine design, without recourse to sophisticated numerical analysis. These self-similarity methods are simple enough to be taught to undergraduates, and could be incorporated in textbooks alongside the core sections on elasticity and plasticity, providing guidance on the application of these techniques to real non-linear soil.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2007
Keywords: Clays, Deformation, Design, Footings/foundations, Soil/structure interaction

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 419856
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419856
ISSN: 0016-8505
PURE UUID: 947a8293-2a8a-41c1-9b9b-50f1869b791f
ORCID for D.J. White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-582X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.S. Osman
Author: D.J. White ORCID iD
Author: A.M. Britto
Author: M.D. Bolton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×