The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of the bearing capacity of flat and conical circular foundations on sand

A comparison of the bearing capacity of flat and conical circular foundations on sand
A comparison of the bearing capacity of flat and conical circular foundations on sand

This paper describes a series of centrifuge model tests investigating the vertical bearing capacity of flat and conical circular foundations on sand, which are representative of the spudcan foundations of offshore jack-up units. It is found that at shallow embedment the bearing capacity factor, N γ, mobilised by a conical footing is significantly lower - by a factor of up to 2 - than that for a flat footing. Plasticity solutions indicate that this discrepancy cannot be attributed to the theoretical differences in Nγ that arise from the roughness and geometry of the cone: these theoretical differences are minor (<10%). Instead, it is proposed that in dense sand the pre-shearing induced by the conical shape of the footing leads to a form of progressive failure, so a lower operative friction angle is applicable to conical foundations than for flat footings. Since accurate solutions for Nγ exist, the key uncertainty in the prediction of bearing capacity is the appropriate friction angle, which is affected by this progressive failure mechanism. A backanalysis that incorporates Bolton's stress-dilatancy correlations in an iterative calculation for bearing capacity is introduced, using recently published definitive values of N γ. This framework is calibrated using centrifuge model test data. The progressive failure mechanism is captured in a simple fashion by varying Bolton's m parameter, which controls the dilatant contribution to peak strength. This back-analysis is used to create simple charts that illustrate the effects of stress level, density and progressive failure on the operative friction angle and Nγ. These charts are compared with existing guidance for spudcan bearing capacity.

Bearing capacity, Centrifuge modelling, Footings/foundations, Sands
0016-8505
781-792
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Teh, K.L.
78aab1ba-6407-4895-93d9-9f8c4356893f
Leung, C. F.
2c1d2496-c91a-4750-aece-31ce32047e5e
Chow, Y.K.
71f769b5-fef2-4b0c-970a-906e2e13cd1d
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Teh, K.L.
78aab1ba-6407-4895-93d9-9f8c4356893f
Leung, C. F.
2c1d2496-c91a-4750-aece-31ce32047e5e
Chow, Y.K.
71f769b5-fef2-4b0c-970a-906e2e13cd1d

White, D.J., Teh, K.L., Leung, C. F. and Chow, Y.K. (2008) A comparison of the bearing capacity of flat and conical circular foundations on sand. Geotechnique, 58 (10), 781-792. (doi:10.1680/geot.2008.3781).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper describes a series of centrifuge model tests investigating the vertical bearing capacity of flat and conical circular foundations on sand, which are representative of the spudcan foundations of offshore jack-up units. It is found that at shallow embedment the bearing capacity factor, N γ, mobilised by a conical footing is significantly lower - by a factor of up to 2 - than that for a flat footing. Plasticity solutions indicate that this discrepancy cannot be attributed to the theoretical differences in Nγ that arise from the roughness and geometry of the cone: these theoretical differences are minor (<10%). Instead, it is proposed that in dense sand the pre-shearing induced by the conical shape of the footing leads to a form of progressive failure, so a lower operative friction angle is applicable to conical foundations than for flat footings. Since accurate solutions for Nγ exist, the key uncertainty in the prediction of bearing capacity is the appropriate friction angle, which is affected by this progressive failure mechanism. A backanalysis that incorporates Bolton's stress-dilatancy correlations in an iterative calculation for bearing capacity is introduced, using recently published definitive values of N γ. This framework is calibrated using centrifuge model test data. The progressive failure mechanism is captured in a simple fashion by varying Bolton's m parameter, which controls the dilatant contribution to peak strength. This back-analysis is used to create simple charts that illustrate the effects of stress level, density and progressive failure on the operative friction angle and Nγ. These charts are compared with existing guidance for spudcan bearing capacity.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: December 2008
Keywords: Bearing capacity, Centrifuge modelling, Footings/foundations, Sands

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 419858
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419858
ISSN: 0016-8505
PURE UUID: 0616c7eb-b9cb-4e32-b67f-43f4ea69ff83
ORCID for D.J. White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-582X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D.J. White ORCID iD
Author: K.L. Teh
Author: C. F. Leung
Author: Y.K. Chow

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×