The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand

The uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand
The uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand

The design of buried anchors and pipelines requires assessment of the peak uplift resistance. This paper describes a limit equilibrium solution for the uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand. The geometry of this solution reflects observations from model tests. Peak angles of friction and dilation are found using established correlations that capture the influence of stress level and density. These angles govern the geometry of the failure mechanism and the mobilised resistance. The solution is validated using a database of 115 model tests on pipes and strip anchors assembled from the published literature. Good agreement with the overall database is shown, without optimisation of any input parameters. The method overpredicts the uplift resistance of smooth model pipes by ∼10%, highlighting the influence of pipe roughness. In contrast, it is shown that the solution for uplift resistance based on the limit theorems of plasticity is generally unconservative. The assumption of normality, which is required by the limit theorems, leads to an unrealistic failure mechanism involving uplift of a far wider zone of soil than is seen in model tests. Plasticity theory, with normality, is inappropriate for modelling this class of kinematically restrained problem in drained conditions, as normality is not observed. As finite element analysis is not routinely used in practice - partly owing to the difficulty in selecting appropriate input parameters to describe dilatancy and plastic flow -the simple analytical idealisation described in this paper provides a useful tool for uplift resistance prediction. Simple charts for the prediction of peak uplift resistance from critical state friction angle, relative density and normalised burial depth are presented, to aid the design of buried pipes and anchors.

Anchors, Centrifuge modelling, Design, Model tests, Sands
0016-8505
771-779
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Cheuk, C.Y.
4fd1f770-b1c1-4d15-b1b2-464c7a2a0d86
Bolton, M.D.
9fbf6ba8-1095-4220-a7f6-38f5463a58e7
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Cheuk, C.Y.
4fd1f770-b1c1-4d15-b1b2-464c7a2a0d86
Bolton, M.D.
9fbf6ba8-1095-4220-a7f6-38f5463a58e7

White, D.J., Cheuk, C.Y. and Bolton, M.D. (2008) The uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand. Geotechnique, 58 (10), 771-779. (doi:10.1680/geot.2008.3692).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The design of buried anchors and pipelines requires assessment of the peak uplift resistance. This paper describes a limit equilibrium solution for the uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand. The geometry of this solution reflects observations from model tests. Peak angles of friction and dilation are found using established correlations that capture the influence of stress level and density. These angles govern the geometry of the failure mechanism and the mobilised resistance. The solution is validated using a database of 115 model tests on pipes and strip anchors assembled from the published literature. Good agreement with the overall database is shown, without optimisation of any input parameters. The method overpredicts the uplift resistance of smooth model pipes by ∼10%, highlighting the influence of pipe roughness. In contrast, it is shown that the solution for uplift resistance based on the limit theorems of plasticity is generally unconservative. The assumption of normality, which is required by the limit theorems, leads to an unrealistic failure mechanism involving uplift of a far wider zone of soil than is seen in model tests. Plasticity theory, with normality, is inappropriate for modelling this class of kinematically restrained problem in drained conditions, as normality is not observed. As finite element analysis is not routinely used in practice - partly owing to the difficulty in selecting appropriate input parameters to describe dilatancy and plastic flow -the simple analytical idealisation described in this paper provides a useful tool for uplift resistance prediction. Simple charts for the prediction of peak uplift resistance from critical state friction angle, relative density and normalised burial depth are presented, to aid the design of buried pipes and anchors.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: December 2008
Keywords: Anchors, Centrifuge modelling, Design, Model tests, Sands

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 419863
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419863
ISSN: 0016-8505
PURE UUID: 81f0cbfa-6b92-4172-8ef6-9b4b20201aa6
ORCID for D.J. White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-582X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D.J. White ORCID iD
Author: C.Y. Cheuk
Author: M.D. Bolton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×