Summary data for tracer gas dispersion tests for landfill methane emission monitoring at a UK landfill
Summary data for tracer gas dispersion tests for landfill methane emission monitoring at a UK landfill
This dataset supports the publications:
1) Rees-White, T. C., Mønster, J., Beaven R. P., Scheutz, C. (2018) Measuring methane emissions from a UK landfill sing the tracer dispersion method and the influence of operational and environmental factors https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.023
2) Matacchiera F, Manes C, Beaven RP, Rees-White TC, Boano F, Mønster J and Scheutz C (2018). AERMOD as a Gaussian dispersion model for planning tracer gas dispersion tests for landfill methane emission quantification https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.007
Contents
+++++++++
This dataset contains the data discussed within the papers listed above and in certain Figures from the Rees-White paper.
The figures are as follows:
Fig. 3. Atmospheric pressure and wind speed during the period of August 5th to August 14th, 2014. Start and end times of each TDM experiment are given as vertical lines
Fig. 4. Incoming solar radiation and air temperature during the period of August 3th to August 14th, 2014. Start and end times of each TDM experiment are given as vertical lines
Fig. 6 (a to f). Methane emission data for each transect in a TDM with average overall emission and the 95% confidence interval. The name of the monitoring route used for a given transect is also shown
Fig. 7. Measured methane emissions vs. average wind speed for the six TDM trials. Linear regression is given (R2 = -0.82).
Fig. 8. Individual transect data from TDM2 shown against estimated wind speed, interpolated between measurement points. Data are colour coded to reflect the monitoring route used. a) shows data between 18:07 and 20:09, and b) 20:59 to 22:14.
Fig. 9. a) Average methane emission data from each monitoring route shown against measuring distance, b) Average methane emission rate from each monitoring route for a given TDM measured at different monitoring distances.
Geographic location of this data collection: University of Southampton, U.K.
Dataset available under a CC BY 4.0 licence
Publisher: University of Southampton, U.K.
Date: April 2018
University of Southampton
Rees-White, Tristan
852278dd-f628-4d98-a03a-a34fea8c75d6
Mønster, J.
e9bfee68-17aa-499e-a597-8da39301af1b
Beaven, R.P.
5893d749-f03c-4c55-b9c9-e90f00a32b57
Scheutz, Charlotte
a3d4800e-b39f-4236-98db-4b4f5fa07877
Rees-White, Tristan
852278dd-f628-4d98-a03a-a34fea8c75d6
Mønster, J.
e9bfee68-17aa-499e-a597-8da39301af1b
Beaven, R.P.
5893d749-f03c-4c55-b9c9-e90f00a32b57
Scheutz, Charlotte
a3d4800e-b39f-4236-98db-4b4f5fa07877
Rees-White, Tristan, Mønster, J., Beaven, R.P. and Scheutz, Charlotte
(2018)
Summary data for tracer gas dispersion tests for landfill methane emission monitoring at a UK landfill.
University of Southampton
doi:10.5258/SOTON/D0391
[Dataset]
Abstract
This dataset supports the publications:
1) Rees-White, T. C., Mønster, J., Beaven R. P., Scheutz, C. (2018) Measuring methane emissions from a UK landfill sing the tracer dispersion method and the influence of operational and environmental factors https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.023
2) Matacchiera F, Manes C, Beaven RP, Rees-White TC, Boano F, Mønster J and Scheutz C (2018). AERMOD as a Gaussian dispersion model for planning tracer gas dispersion tests for landfill methane emission quantification https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.007
Contents
+++++++++
This dataset contains the data discussed within the papers listed above and in certain Figures from the Rees-White paper.
The figures are as follows:
Fig. 3. Atmospheric pressure and wind speed during the period of August 5th to August 14th, 2014. Start and end times of each TDM experiment are given as vertical lines
Fig. 4. Incoming solar radiation and air temperature during the period of August 3th to August 14th, 2014. Start and end times of each TDM experiment are given as vertical lines
Fig. 6 (a to f). Methane emission data for each transect in a TDM with average overall emission and the 95% confidence interval. The name of the monitoring route used for a given transect is also shown
Fig. 7. Measured methane emissions vs. average wind speed for the six TDM trials. Linear regression is given (R2 = -0.82).
Fig. 8. Individual transect data from TDM2 shown against estimated wind speed, interpolated between measurement points. Data are colour coded to reflect the monitoring route used. a) shows data between 18:07 and 20:09, and b) 20:59 to 22:14.
Fig. 9. a) Average methane emission data from each monitoring route shown against measuring distance, b) Average methane emission rate from each monitoring route for a given TDM measured at different monitoring distances.
Geographic location of this data collection: University of Southampton, U.K.
Dataset available under a CC BY 4.0 licence
Publisher: University of Southampton, U.K.
Date: April 2018
Spreadsheet
Data_for_WM_Papers.xlsx
- Dataset
Text
README.txt
- Dataset
More information
Published date: 2018
Organisations:
Infrastructure Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 419964
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419964
PURE UUID: 7c96ba18-f84e-4984-9625-6888f28d237c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Apr 2018 16:32
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:45
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Creator:
J. Mønster
Creator:
Charlotte Scheutz
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics