Estimating models for panel survey data under complex sampling
Estimating models for panel survey data under complex sampling
Complex designs are often used to select the sample which is followed over time in a panel survey. We consider some parametric models for panel data and discuss methods of estimating the model parameters which allow for complex schemes. We incorporate survey weights into alternative point estimation procedures. We also consider variance estimation using linearization methods to allow for complex sampling, and indicate connections with established asymptotically distribution free (ADF) methods. The behaviour of the proposed inference procedures are assessed in a simulation study, based upon data from the British Household Panel Survey. There appear to be some advantages of using the weighted maximum likelihood (ML) point estimation method compared to the weighted ADF method. Variance estimation methods that allow for clustering tend to lead to improvements in terms of bias. However, the variance estimator for the weighted ML estimator performs better than the ADF variance estimators.
Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton
Vieira, Marcel D.T.
3318b688-b2f8-48d4-b92a-6fb65a045514
Skinner, Chris J.
dec5ef40-49ef-492a-8a1d-eb8c6315b8ce
2006
Vieira, Marcel D.T.
3318b688-b2f8-48d4-b92a-6fb65a045514
Skinner, Chris J.
dec5ef40-49ef-492a-8a1d-eb8c6315b8ce
Vieira, Marcel D.T. and Skinner, Chris J.
(2006)
Estimating models for panel survey data under complex sampling
(S3RI Methodology Working Papers, M06/17)
Southampton, UK.
Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton
30pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
Complex designs are often used to select the sample which is followed over time in a panel survey. We consider some parametric models for panel data and discuss methods of estimating the model parameters which allow for complex schemes. We incorporate survey weights into alternative point estimation procedures. We also consider variance estimation using linearization methods to allow for complex sampling, and indicate connections with established asymptotically distribution free (ADF) methods. The behaviour of the proposed inference procedures are assessed in a simulation study, based upon data from the British Household Panel Survey. There appear to be some advantages of using the weighted maximum likelihood (ML) point estimation method compared to the weighted ADF method. Variance estimation methods that allow for clustering tend to lead to improvements in terms of bias. However, the variance estimator for the weighted ML estimator performs better than the ADF variance estimators.
Text
42001-01.pdf
- Author's Original
More information
Published date: 2006
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 42001
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/42001
PURE UUID: 7702d529-ee04-4d89-88ea-e36177a2b461
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Oct 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:42
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Marcel D.T. Vieira
Author:
Chris J. Skinner
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics