The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The Archaeology of art: Materials, practices, affects

The Archaeology of art: Materials, practices, affects
The Archaeology of art: Materials, practices, affects
How can archaeologists interpret ancient art and images if they do not treat them as symbols or signifiers of identity?

Traditional approaches to the archaeology of art have borrowed from the history of art and the anthropology of art by focusing on iconography, meaning, communication and identity. This puts the archaeology of art at a disadvantage as an understanding of iconography and meaning requires a detailed knowledge of historical or ethnographic context unavailable to many archaeologists. Rather than playing to archaeology’s weaknesses, the authors argue that an archaeology of art should instead play to archaeology’s strength: the material character of archaeological evidence.

Using case studies - examining rock art, figurines, beadwork, murals, coffin decorations, sculpture and architecture from Europe, the Americas, Asia, Australia, and north Africa -the authors develop an understanding of the affective and effective nature of ancient art and imagery. An analysis of a series of material-based practices, from gesture and improvisation to miniaturisation and gigantism, assembly and disassembly and the use of distinctions in colour enable key concepts, such as style and meaning, to be re-imagined as affective practices. Recasting the archaeology of art as the study of affects offers a new prospectus for the study of ancient art and imagery.
Routledge
Jones, Andrew Meirion
3e8becff-0d46-42eb-85db-2dd4f07e92a3
Cochrane, Andrew
847963ed-9b1a-4cc1-baeb-aef5d13ab740
Jones, Andrew Meirion
3e8becff-0d46-42eb-85db-2dd4f07e92a3
Cochrane, Andrew
847963ed-9b1a-4cc1-baeb-aef5d13ab740

Jones, Andrew Meirion and Cochrane, Andrew (2018) The Archaeology of art: Materials, practices, affects (Themes in Archaeology Series), London/New York. Routledge, 240pp.

Record type: Book

Abstract

How can archaeologists interpret ancient art and images if they do not treat them as symbols or signifiers of identity?

Traditional approaches to the archaeology of art have borrowed from the history of art and the anthropology of art by focusing on iconography, meaning, communication and identity. This puts the archaeology of art at a disadvantage as an understanding of iconography and meaning requires a detailed knowledge of historical or ethnographic context unavailable to many archaeologists. Rather than playing to archaeology’s weaknesses, the authors argue that an archaeology of art should instead play to archaeology’s strength: the material character of archaeological evidence.

Using case studies - examining rock art, figurines, beadwork, murals, coffin decorations, sculpture and architecture from Europe, the Americas, Asia, Australia, and north Africa -the authors develop an understanding of the affective and effective nature of ancient art and imagery. An analysis of a series of material-based practices, from gesture and improvisation to miniaturisation and gigantism, assembly and disassembly and the use of distinctions in colour enable key concepts, such as style and meaning, to be re-imagined as affective practices. Recasting the archaeology of art as the study of affects offers a new prospectus for the study of ancient art and imagery.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: May 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 420318
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/420318
PURE UUID: e132cd2a-c5ac-4681-b39e-6b3c54e18b05

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 May 2018 16:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 19:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew Cochrane

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×