Wilkes, the Chevalier D'Eon and ‘the Dregs of Liberty’: an Anglo-French perspective on ministerial despotism, 1762–1771
Wilkes, the Chevalier D'Eon and ‘the Dregs of Liberty’: an Anglo-French perspective on ministerial despotism, 1762–1771
In the immediate aftermath of the Seven Years' War, both the British and French regimes underwent a crisis of confidence. Unable or unwilling to criticise Louis XV and George III directly, critics targeted ‘favourites’ and ‘ministerial despots’, accusing them of adopting unconstitutional measures in an attempt to regain lost financial and political credibility. Efforts to locate this travestied constitution, however, found notions of parliamentary sovereignty and ‘fundamental law’ to be equally elusive, and could be distracted by the charms of a patriot alternative to traditional models of rule. The aim of this piece is to explore this debate by focusing on two individuals: the journalist John Wilkes and the Chevalier D'Eon, a diplomat and spy. Thanks to their criticism of ministers and ministerial diplomatic and financial policy, both faced government persecution, which they sought to evade by fleeing to each other's country. Rather than serving to diminish their fame, exile saw them win new allies and audiences. The skill with which Wilkes and D'Eon could translate what was a popular cause in London into a cause célèbre in Paris and Versailles (and vice versa) suggests that the two regimes had more in common than their mutual historiographical isolation would indicate.
1251-1288
Conlin, Jonathan
3ab58a7d-d74b-48d9-99db-1ba2f3aada40
2005
Conlin, Jonathan
3ab58a7d-d74b-48d9-99db-1ba2f3aada40
Conlin, Jonathan
(2005)
Wilkes, the Chevalier D'Eon and ‘the Dregs of Liberty’: an Anglo-French perspective on ministerial despotism, 1762–1771.
English Historical Review, 120 (489), .
(doi:10.1093/ehr/cei331).
Abstract
In the immediate aftermath of the Seven Years' War, both the British and French regimes underwent a crisis of confidence. Unable or unwilling to criticise Louis XV and George III directly, critics targeted ‘favourites’ and ‘ministerial despots’, accusing them of adopting unconstitutional measures in an attempt to regain lost financial and political credibility. Efforts to locate this travestied constitution, however, found notions of parliamentary sovereignty and ‘fundamental law’ to be equally elusive, and could be distracted by the charms of a patriot alternative to traditional models of rule. The aim of this piece is to explore this debate by focusing on two individuals: the journalist John Wilkes and the Chevalier D'Eon, a diplomat and spy. Thanks to their criticism of ministers and ministerial diplomatic and financial policy, both faced government persecution, which they sought to evade by fleeing to each other's country. Rather than serving to diminish their fame, exile saw them win new allies and audiences. The skill with which Wilkes and D'Eon could translate what was a popular cause in London into a cause célèbre in Paris and Versailles (and vice versa) suggests that the two regimes had more in common than their mutual historiographical isolation would indicate.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2005
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 42100
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/42100
ISSN: 0013-8266
PURE UUID: e59e0c7a-eb08-4cd0-b12b-8fb03a59c037
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Nov 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:52
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
