The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Testing equality: insanity, treatment refusal and the CRPD

Testing equality: insanity, treatment refusal and the CRPD
Testing equality: insanity, treatment refusal and the CRPD

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is considered to be a radical international treaty that affords persons with disability recognition and protection of equal rights in socio-cultural, political, medical and legal arenas. Drawing from the Convention's core principles of equality and non-discrimination, the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Convention's Committee have called for a replacement of the insanity defence with a disability-neutral doctrine. The rationale is that retaining this special defence is, in itself, discriminatory, given its function is necessarily based on the presence of mental disability and the assumption that such disabilities impair capacity and reasoning. This article interrogates the rationale behind ‘abolitionist’ views, and asks whether equality necessarily means treating all persons identically regardless of capacity to reason about conduct.

CRPD, equality, insanity defence, treatment refusal
1321-8719
174-185
Wondemaghen, Meron
ffb7f092-1b45-4e9d-94d5-52484047961f
Wondemaghen, Meron
ffb7f092-1b45-4e9d-94d5-52484047961f

Wondemaghen, Meron (2018) Testing equality: insanity, treatment refusal and the CRPD. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25 (2), 174-185. (doi:10.1080/13218719.2017.1371575).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is considered to be a radical international treaty that affords persons with disability recognition and protection of equal rights in socio-cultural, political, medical and legal arenas. Drawing from the Convention's core principles of equality and non-discrimination, the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Convention's Committee have called for a replacement of the insanity defence with a disability-neutral doctrine. The rationale is that retaining this special defence is, in itself, discriminatory, given its function is necessarily based on the presence of mental disability and the assumption that such disabilities impair capacity and reasoning. This article interrogates the rationale behind ‘abolitionist’ views, and asks whether equality necessarily means treating all persons identically regardless of capacity to reason about conduct.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 1 October 2017
Published date: 4 March 2018
Keywords: CRPD, equality, insanity defence, treatment refusal

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 421370
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/421370
ISSN: 1321-8719
PURE UUID: 8fcadee0-af48-4234-95ba-c0d343128ef2

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jun 2018 16:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 20:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Meron Wondemaghen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×