Techno-economic and environmental analysis of second-life batteries compared to new in revenue-stacking network-constrained solar PV farm
Techno-economic and environmental analysis of second-life batteries compared to new in revenue-stacking network-constrained solar PV farm
Introduction: a mathematical model has been developed to investigate the use of second-life electric vehicle batteries to expand a solar photovoltaic (PV) farm’s generation capacity beyond its grid export limit. While second-life batteries are lower-cost than new, they must be replaced more frequently. And while they displace the embodied emissions of manufacturing new batteries, their lower efficiency causes more energy conversion losses. A quantification of the environmental and financial net benefits of second-life batteries was sought.
Methods: the modelled system trades electricity on the day-ahead market during the hours 07:00-23:00, and provides a frequency regulation service 23:00-07:00. Linear programming is used to schedule electricity export and battery charge/discharge to maximise day-ahead revenue, given forecasts of PV generation and electricity prices, leaving enough charge stored each evening to fulfil its frequency regulation obligation. The Net Present Value (NPV) and carbon emissions savings are calculated for second-life batteries compared to new batteries.
Results: figure 1 shows the export/charge schedule for an example day with a new battery. Figure 2 shows how the schedule adapts itself for a second-life battery. The whole-life (25-year) NPV and emissions savings in each case do not differ significantly relative to the model uncertainties.
No existing work studies in as much detail the relationship between financial and environmental benefits of a revenue-stacking PV-and-battery farm using second-life batteries. This is important because financial and environmental objectives must be aligned if decarbonisation of electricity networks is to be achieved. As the case for second-life batteries is marginal, further study is needed before advocating or ruling out the concept.
second-life batteries, solar PV, techno-economic, carbon-counting
Sun, Susan Isaya
61b831f2-4930-4b85-b940-297bb15da4e1
Kiaee, Mahdi
1d965346-f270-4093-b4d8-6348c0f8ec95
Chipperfield, Andrew
524269cd-5f30-4356-92d4-891c14c09340
Wills, Richard
60b7c98f-eced-4b11-aad9-fd2484e26c2c
19 June 2018
Sun, Susan Isaya
61b831f2-4930-4b85-b940-297bb15da4e1
Kiaee, Mahdi
1d965346-f270-4093-b4d8-6348c0f8ec95
Chipperfield, Andrew
524269cd-5f30-4356-92d4-891c14c09340
Wills, Richard
60b7c98f-eced-4b11-aad9-fd2484e26c2c
Sun, Susan Isaya, Kiaee, Mahdi, Chipperfield, Andrew and Wills, Richard
(2018)
Techno-economic and environmental analysis of second-life batteries compared to new in revenue-stacking network-constrained solar PV farm.
Energy Systems conference.
19 - 20 Jun 2018.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Other)
Abstract
Introduction: a mathematical model has been developed to investigate the use of second-life electric vehicle batteries to expand a solar photovoltaic (PV) farm’s generation capacity beyond its grid export limit. While second-life batteries are lower-cost than new, they must be replaced more frequently. And while they displace the embodied emissions of manufacturing new batteries, their lower efficiency causes more energy conversion losses. A quantification of the environmental and financial net benefits of second-life batteries was sought.
Methods: the modelled system trades electricity on the day-ahead market during the hours 07:00-23:00, and provides a frequency regulation service 23:00-07:00. Linear programming is used to schedule electricity export and battery charge/discharge to maximise day-ahead revenue, given forecasts of PV generation and electricity prices, leaving enough charge stored each evening to fulfil its frequency regulation obligation. The Net Present Value (NPV) and carbon emissions savings are calculated for second-life batteries compared to new batteries.
Results: figure 1 shows the export/charge schedule for an example day with a new battery. Figure 2 shows how the schedule adapts itself for a second-life battery. The whole-life (25-year) NPV and emissions savings in each case do not differ significantly relative to the model uncertainties.
No existing work studies in as much detail the relationship between financial and environmental benefits of a revenue-stacking PV-and-battery farm using second-life batteries. This is important because financial and environmental objectives must be aligned if decarbonisation of electricity networks is to be achieved. As the case for second-life batteries is marginal, further study is needed before advocating or ruling out the concept.
Text
Presentation_SusanSun_190618_pdfversion
Restricted to Registered users only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 19 June 2018
Venue - Dates:
Energy Systems conference, 2018-06-19 - 2018-06-20
Keywords:
second-life batteries, solar PV, techno-economic, carbon-counting
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 422022
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/422022
PURE UUID: bf2f6f02-656a-423b-8b22-90baee48186f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Jul 2018 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:34
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Susan Isaya Sun
Author:
Mahdi Kiaee
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics