The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What stops practitioners discussing medication breaks in children and adolescents with ADHD? Identifying barriers through theory-driven qualitative research

What stops practitioners discussing medication breaks in children and adolescents with ADHD? Identifying barriers through theory-driven qualitative research
What stops practitioners discussing medication breaks in children and adolescents with ADHD? Identifying barriers through theory-driven qualitative research
Background: National and international guidelines on the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents call for annual reviews to assess continuing need for medication by considering brief periods without medication, referred to as 'Drug holidays'. However, drug holidays are reactively initiated by families, or recommended by practitioners if growth has been suppressed by medication rather than proactively to check the need. There is little evidence of planned, practitioner-initiated drug holidays from methylphenidate. The aim of this study was to identify what stops practitioners from routinely discussing planned drug holidays from methylphenidate with children, adolescents, and their parents.
Methods: Practitioners involved in shared-care prescribing for children and adolescents with ADHD in one UK County were included. Interviews with 8 general practitioners (GPs) and 8 Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) practitioners were conducted. Transcripts were analysed qualitatively against the components of the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model. Possible interventions for increasing prescribers’ engagement with planned drug holidays were considered in response.
Results: Multiple barriers to practitioner engagement in planned drug holidays from methylphenidate were identified. Capability, in terms of knowledge and skills, was not a barrier identified for CAMHS practitioners but was for GPs. Opportunity was a main barrier for both groups, who reported lack of time and the absence of educational material about drug holidays. Motivation was more complex to define, with CAMHS practitioners questioning the need for drug holidays and GPs being more accepting due to worries about long-term medication side-effects as well as cost savings. 'Education' and 'enablement' interventions were identified as key activities targeting all three components, which could feasibly increase uptake of practitioner-initiated planned drug holidays from methylphenidate.
Conclusion: The application of the COM-B system identified a number of key barriers to practitioner engagement with drug holidays in children and adolescents with ADHD. Accordingly, a number of interventions could be developed to facilitate change. For example, educating and training GPs about ADHD management and drug holidays, and developing a decision-aid to help families make informed decisions about whether or not to implement drug holidays could be used.
1866-6647
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Parastou, Donyai
1dcc4d41-10cd-4ec8-a6c3-4abea39d4f44
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Parastou, Donyai
1dcc4d41-10cd-4ec8-a6c3-4abea39d4f44

Ibrahim, Kinda and Parastou, Donyai (2018) What stops practitioners discussing medication breaks in children and adolescents with ADHD? Identifying barriers through theory-driven qualitative research. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders. (doi:10.1007/s12402-018-0258-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: National and international guidelines on the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents call for annual reviews to assess continuing need for medication by considering brief periods without medication, referred to as 'Drug holidays'. However, drug holidays are reactively initiated by families, or recommended by practitioners if growth has been suppressed by medication rather than proactively to check the need. There is little evidence of planned, practitioner-initiated drug holidays from methylphenidate. The aim of this study was to identify what stops practitioners from routinely discussing planned drug holidays from methylphenidate with children, adolescents, and their parents.
Methods: Practitioners involved in shared-care prescribing for children and adolescents with ADHD in one UK County were included. Interviews with 8 general practitioners (GPs) and 8 Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) practitioners were conducted. Transcripts were analysed qualitatively against the components of the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model. Possible interventions for increasing prescribers’ engagement with planned drug holidays were considered in response.
Results: Multiple barriers to practitioner engagement in planned drug holidays from methylphenidate were identified. Capability, in terms of knowledge and skills, was not a barrier identified for CAMHS practitioners but was for GPs. Opportunity was a main barrier for both groups, who reported lack of time and the absence of educational material about drug holidays. Motivation was more complex to define, with CAMHS practitioners questioning the need for drug holidays and GPs being more accepting due to worries about long-term medication side-effects as well as cost savings. 'Education' and 'enablement' interventions were identified as key activities targeting all three components, which could feasibly increase uptake of practitioner-initiated planned drug holidays from methylphenidate.
Conclusion: The application of the COM-B system identified a number of key barriers to practitioner engagement with drug holidays in children and adolescents with ADHD. Accordingly, a number of interventions could be developed to facilitate change. For example, educating and training GPs about ADHD management and drug holidays, and developing a decision-aid to help families make informed decisions about whether or not to implement drug holidays could be used.

Text
Ibrahim-Donyai2018_Article_WhatStopsPractitionersDiscussi - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (834kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 June 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 July 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 422183
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/422183
ISSN: 1866-6647
PURE UUID: 78b589c5-7509-4613-8f2f-c07b23403deb
ORCID for Kinda Ibrahim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5709-3867

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Jul 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kinda Ibrahim ORCID iD
Author: Donyai Parastou

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×