The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository
Warning ePrints Soton is experiencing an issue with some file downloads not being available. We are working hard to fix this. Please bear with us.

Detailed investigation of loss prediction of an axial compressor cascade at off-design conditions in the presence of incident free-stream disturbances using large eddy simulations

Detailed investigation of loss prediction of an axial compressor cascade at off-design conditions in the presence of incident free-stream disturbances using large eddy simulations
Detailed investigation of loss prediction of an axial compressor cascade at off-design conditions in the presence of incident free-stream disturbances using large eddy simulations
The prediction of an axial compressor’s loss early on in the design phase is a valuable and important part of the design process. The work presented here focuses on assessing the accuracy of current prediction methods, Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS), compared with highly accurate Large Eddy Simulations (LES). The simulations were performed at the challenging running conditions of engine relevant Mach (0.67) and Reynolds (300,000) numbers. The work looks at the effects of off-design incidence and the influence of different free-stream disturbances on loss prediction.

From the highly accurate datasets produced by the LES the work is able to show how loss attribution varies under different conditions, and goes on to compare how well RANS captures these changes. It was found that overall loss trends are captured well by RANS but substantial differences exist when comparing individual loss sources, which are shown to vary significantly under different running conditions.

The investigation into loss attribution is performed using the Denton (1993) loss breakdown as well as a novel application of the Miller (2013) mechanical work potential. In addition to the discovery of the variation in the sources of loss, the comparison between the loss analyses highlighted some of the limitations of the Denton loss breakdown, which was shown to have increasing error under large off-design incidence or in the presence of discrete disturbances.

From the comparison of the loss breakdown analyses and LES and RANS flow field results, new insight into the characteristics, limitations and short comings of current modeling techniques have been found. The variation in the sources of loss under different running conditions was also discovered.
University of Southampton
Leggett, John
31ece775-d118-4dab-a6ae-c66317e012ac
Leggett, John
31ece775-d118-4dab-a6ae-c66317e012ac
Richardson, Edward
a8357516-e871-40d8-8a53-de7847aa2d08

Leggett, John (2018) Detailed investigation of loss prediction of an axial compressor cascade at off-design conditions in the presence of incident free-stream disturbances using large eddy simulations. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 245pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The prediction of an axial compressor’s loss early on in the design phase is a valuable and important part of the design process. The work presented here focuses on assessing the accuracy of current prediction methods, Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS), compared with highly accurate Large Eddy Simulations (LES). The simulations were performed at the challenging running conditions of engine relevant Mach (0.67) and Reynolds (300,000) numbers. The work looks at the effects of off-design incidence and the influence of different free-stream disturbances on loss prediction.

From the highly accurate datasets produced by the LES the work is able to show how loss attribution varies under different conditions, and goes on to compare how well RANS captures these changes. It was found that overall loss trends are captured well by RANS but substantial differences exist when comparing individual loss sources, which are shown to vary significantly under different running conditions.

The investigation into loss attribution is performed using the Denton (1993) loss breakdown as well as a novel application of the Miller (2013) mechanical work potential. In addition to the discovery of the variation in the sources of loss, the comparison between the loss analyses highlighted some of the limitations of the Denton loss breakdown, which was shown to have increasing error under large off-design incidence or in the presence of discrete disturbances.

From the comparison of the loss breakdown analyses and LES and RANS flow field results, new insight into the characteristics, limitations and short comings of current modeling techniques have been found. The variation in the sources of loss under different running conditions was also discovered.

Text
FINAL Thesis John Leggett - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (51MB)

More information

Published date: April 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 422285
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/422285
PURE UUID: a7ef09e3-a7d4-44db-8166-83f58284947e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jul 2018 16:30
Last modified: 21 Nov 2021 12:48

Export record

Contributors

Author: John Leggett
Thesis advisor: Edward Richardson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×