Free fall penetrometer tests in sand: Determining the equivalent static resistance
Free fall penetrometer tests in sand: Determining the equivalent static resistance
Free Fall Penetrometer (FFP) tests provide an efficient way to determine the penetration resistance at shallow depths in sandy soils, and are being used increasingly in geotechnical,geomorphological and coastal engineering applications. A limitation of free fall penetrometers is the effect of their high velocity on the penetration resistance. This affects the drainage condition, creates aviscous-type enhancement of the mobilised strength, and also introduces inertial drag forces. It is useful ifthe measured FFP resistance can be adjusted back to the resistance that would be expected in a standard Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) at the same location. With this adjustment, the resistance can be used in the same correlations and design methods as standard CPT data. Adjustments for viscous-type rate effects and inertial drag have been proposed and explored in detail for clay soils. The contribution of this paper is to outline a correction scheme for drainage condition, which is more relevant for sandy soils.This correction utilizes the dissipation response at the end of the FFP test, in combination with the measured or derived FFP tip resistance. Relationships for penetration resistance in drained and undrained conditions based on density state are developed. It is shown that the high velocity FFP resistance can be uniquely mapped to a resistance from a standard CPT, when combined with the dissipation response. With development and validation, this new framework could enhance the value of FFPs as a complementary or alternative technology alongside conventional static penetration testing
695-701
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
O'Loughlin, C.D.
cd36a0df-e345-48fa-9f35-2a43f2cdda6f
Stark, N.
730ea96c-3734-49c7-8b6e-a55eb1b8d211
Chow, S.H.
7bbb0ede-4e74-46ad-8586-425fa5d2672a
2018
White, D.J.
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
O'Loughlin, C.D.
cd36a0df-e345-48fa-9f35-2a43f2cdda6f
Stark, N.
730ea96c-3734-49c7-8b6e-a55eb1b8d211
Chow, S.H.
7bbb0ede-4e74-46ad-8586-425fa5d2672a
White, D.J., O'Loughlin, C.D., Stark, N. and Chow, S.H.
(2018)
Free fall penetrometer tests in sand: Determining the equivalent static resistance.
Hicks, Michael A., Pisano, Frederico and Peuchen, Joek
(eds.)
In Cone Penetration Testing 2018: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing.
CRC Press.
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Free Fall Penetrometer (FFP) tests provide an efficient way to determine the penetration resistance at shallow depths in sandy soils, and are being used increasingly in geotechnical,geomorphological and coastal engineering applications. A limitation of free fall penetrometers is the effect of their high velocity on the penetration resistance. This affects the drainage condition, creates aviscous-type enhancement of the mobilised strength, and also introduces inertial drag forces. It is useful ifthe measured FFP resistance can be adjusted back to the resistance that would be expected in a standard Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) at the same location. With this adjustment, the resistance can be used in the same correlations and design methods as standard CPT data. Adjustments for viscous-type rate effects and inertial drag have been proposed and explored in detail for clay soils. The contribution of this paper is to outline a correction scheme for drainage condition, which is more relevant for sandy soils.This correction utilizes the dissipation response at the end of the FFP test, in combination with the measured or derived FFP tip resistance. Relationships for penetration resistance in drained and undrained conditions based on density state are developed. It is shown that the high velocity FFP resistance can be uniquely mapped to a resistance from a standard CPT, when combined with the dissipation response. With development and validation, this new framework could enhance the value of FFPs as a complementary or alternative technology alongside conventional static penetration testing
Text
9 White et al 2018
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 February 2018
Published date: 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 422538
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/422538
PURE UUID: 2405548f-e1b7-4646-be4b-2c8e508920e5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Jul 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:32
Export record
Contributors
Author:
C.D. O'Loughlin
Author:
N. Stark
Author:
S.H. Chow
Editor:
Michael A. Hicks
Editor:
Frederico Pisano
Editor:
Joek Peuchen
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics