The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of the number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma

Impact of the number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma
Impact of the number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy <6 versus the conventional ≥6 on survival of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC) database was employed. The association of the number of cycles of chemotherapy with overall survival (OS) was investigated by Cox multiple regression analysis after controlling for recognized prognostic factors. We excluded patients receiving <3 or >9 cycles of platinum chemotherapy to reduce confounding factors. The primary analysis was a comparison of OS with 3-5 cycles versus 6-9 cycles using 6-month landmark analysis when 281 death events were observed.

RESULTS: Of 1,020 patients in RISC, 472 who received cisplatin (n=338) or carboplatin (n=134) were evaluable. A total of 157 patients received 3-5 cycles (median 4) and 315 received 6-9 cycles (median 6). There was no significant difference in OS between 3-5 and 6-9 cycles (HR 1.02, 95%CI: 0.78-1.33, p=0.91). No significant interactions were observed with type of platinum (p=0.09) and completed planned chemotherapy (p=0.56). Limitations of a hypothesis-generating retrospective analysis apply.

CONCLUSIONS: Four cycles of platinum based first-line chemotherapy appear adequate and do not significantly compromise survival of patients with advanced UC. The omission of excessive cycles may avoid unnecessary cumulative toxicities and facilitate better transition to second-line therapy and investigational switch maintenance therapy strategies. These results require prospective validation, but may impact practice in selected patients.

Journal Article
0022-5347
Sonpavde, G.P.
499fa9ae-caf5-49cf-a44f-7eb6a0837853
Mariani, L.
012ef48b-ad18-4cd2-bdba-627c98deafbc
Lo Vullo, S.
5040fff3-7249-447b-94b2-5aa15827cb0d
Raggi, D.
c9f3032d-d265-4926-91f6-7d3020ee8812
Giannatempo, P.
93cdbfc0-ab8f-4bc8-b730-13cfa9aea3b4
Bamias, A.
adfc02a4-8013-4cb8-9449-7948af82f0be
Crabb, S.J.
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Bellmunt, J.
a9cece8e-55c5-4e2e-bb1f-aec7aa8cba91
Yu, E.Y.
3f986437-70b2-4993-90d9-13d06e155d8c
Niegisch, G.
7edd128e-cc2e-4bce-ae7d-8dd6352bcffd
Vaishampayan, U.N.
377052c6-1d03-4f21-97b6-dd857cd5648c
Theodore, C.
585e90d8-8d1f-4198-902f-723f6c3a4822
Berthold, D.R.
e3f702dd-1dc5-48cc-84dd-175b31bb79a9
Srinivas, S.
731405dc-922a-40c0-9b1e-af356cdec141
Sridhar, S.S.
aa953d9f-5ab8-4419-8a03-83513d230218
Plimack, E.R.
1813cdc7-c75c-4161-834c-6dc10354c973
Rosenberg, J.E.
b9e011ca-9408-4366-baea-5f487a246938
Powles, T.
0d3f760a-49dd-46f1-b94d-abb7d0b9ae6d
Galsky, M.D.
57bcde2a-bfea-490b-8a09-8ee8e28563da
Necchi, A.
b274fd73-d3f3-4cc8-9329-5dfde8759265
Sonpavde, G.P.
499fa9ae-caf5-49cf-a44f-7eb6a0837853
Mariani, L.
012ef48b-ad18-4cd2-bdba-627c98deafbc
Lo Vullo, S.
5040fff3-7249-447b-94b2-5aa15827cb0d
Raggi, D.
c9f3032d-d265-4926-91f6-7d3020ee8812
Giannatempo, P.
93cdbfc0-ab8f-4bc8-b730-13cfa9aea3b4
Bamias, A.
adfc02a4-8013-4cb8-9449-7948af82f0be
Crabb, S.J.
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Bellmunt, J.
a9cece8e-55c5-4e2e-bb1f-aec7aa8cba91
Yu, E.Y.
3f986437-70b2-4993-90d9-13d06e155d8c
Niegisch, G.
7edd128e-cc2e-4bce-ae7d-8dd6352bcffd
Vaishampayan, U.N.
377052c6-1d03-4f21-97b6-dd857cd5648c
Theodore, C.
585e90d8-8d1f-4198-902f-723f6c3a4822
Berthold, D.R.
e3f702dd-1dc5-48cc-84dd-175b31bb79a9
Srinivas, S.
731405dc-922a-40c0-9b1e-af356cdec141
Sridhar, S.S.
aa953d9f-5ab8-4419-8a03-83513d230218
Plimack, E.R.
1813cdc7-c75c-4161-834c-6dc10354c973
Rosenberg, J.E.
b9e011ca-9408-4366-baea-5f487a246938
Powles, T.
0d3f760a-49dd-46f1-b94d-abb7d0b9ae6d
Galsky, M.D.
57bcde2a-bfea-490b-8a09-8ee8e28563da
Necchi, A.
b274fd73-d3f3-4cc8-9329-5dfde8759265

Sonpavde, G.P., Mariani, L., Lo Vullo, S., Raggi, D., Giannatempo, P., Bamias, A., Crabb, S.J., Bellmunt, J., Yu, E.Y., Niegisch, G., Vaishampayan, U.N., Theodore, C., Berthold, D.R., Srinivas, S., Sridhar, S.S., Plimack, E.R., Rosenberg, J.E., Powles, T., Galsky, M.D. and Necchi, A. (2018) Impact of the number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. The Journal of Urology. (doi:10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.035).

Record type: Article

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy <6 versus the conventional ≥6 on survival of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC) database was employed. The association of the number of cycles of chemotherapy with overall survival (OS) was investigated by Cox multiple regression analysis after controlling for recognized prognostic factors. We excluded patients receiving <3 or >9 cycles of platinum chemotherapy to reduce confounding factors. The primary analysis was a comparison of OS with 3-5 cycles versus 6-9 cycles using 6-month landmark analysis when 281 death events were observed.

RESULTS: Of 1,020 patients in RISC, 472 who received cisplatin (n=338) or carboplatin (n=134) were evaluable. A total of 157 patients received 3-5 cycles (median 4) and 315 received 6-9 cycles (median 6). There was no significant difference in OS between 3-5 and 6-9 cycles (HR 1.02, 95%CI: 0.78-1.33, p=0.91). No significant interactions were observed with type of platinum (p=0.09) and completed planned chemotherapy (p=0.56). Limitations of a hypothesis-generating retrospective analysis apply.

CONCLUSIONS: Four cycles of platinum based first-line chemotherapy appear adequate and do not significantly compromise survival of patients with advanced UC. The omission of excessive cycles may avoid unnecessary cumulative toxicities and facilitate better transition to second-line therapy and investigational switch maintenance therapy strategies. These results require prospective validation, but may impact practice in selected patients.

Text
PIIS0022534718435318 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (474kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 July 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 September 2018
Keywords: Journal Article

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 422762
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/422762
ISSN: 0022-5347
PURE UUID: 198542eb-8c77-4c55-8ce4-651c252f4199
ORCID for S.J. Crabb: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-9064

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Aug 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:55

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G.P. Sonpavde
Author: L. Mariani
Author: S. Lo Vullo
Author: D. Raggi
Author: P. Giannatempo
Author: A. Bamias
Author: S.J. Crabb ORCID iD
Author: J. Bellmunt
Author: E.Y. Yu
Author: G. Niegisch
Author: U.N. Vaishampayan
Author: C. Theodore
Author: D.R. Berthold
Author: S. Srinivas
Author: S.S. Sridhar
Author: E.R. Plimack
Author: J.E. Rosenberg
Author: T. Powles
Author: M.D. Galsky
Author: A. Necchi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×