Structural analyses and fracture network characterisation: seven pillars of wisdom
Structural analyses and fracture network characterisation: seven pillars of wisdom
Seven distinct types of structural analysis can be defined, each with their own data and uses: (1) basic geological descriptions; (2) geometries and topology; (3) age relationships; (4) kinematics; (5) tectonics; (6) mechanics and (7) fluid flow. We illustrate these types of analysis using the example of faults and fractures, which typically form networks of interacting and connected segments. A framework for describing and characterising fault and fracture networks is presented for each of the structural analysis types. We suggest that any structural study be tailored to suit the desired outcome and that this scheme of analysis types should be used as a basis for the development of workflows, for the design of research projects and for testing hypotheses. For example, prediction of fluid flow through a fracture network must begin with the basic geological description of fracture types. Basic geological descriptions should be followed by measuring their geometries and topologies, understanding their age relationships, kinematic and mechanics, and developing a realistic, data-led model for related fluid flow. Missing steps can lead to fundamentally flawed interpretations.
Fluid flow, Fracture networks, Geometry, Kinematics, Mechanics, structural analysis
13-28
Peacock, D.C.P.
f21efb0d-9039-429a-a3f8-b0543b6652a0
Sanderson, D.J.
5653bc11-b905-4985-8c16-c655b2170ba9
September 2018
Peacock, D.C.P.
f21efb0d-9039-429a-a3f8-b0543b6652a0
Sanderson, D.J.
5653bc11-b905-4985-8c16-c655b2170ba9
Peacock, D.C.P. and Sanderson, D.J.
(2018)
Structural analyses and fracture network characterisation: seven pillars of wisdom.
Earth-Science Reviews, .
(doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.06.006).
Abstract
Seven distinct types of structural analysis can be defined, each with their own data and uses: (1) basic geological descriptions; (2) geometries and topology; (3) age relationships; (4) kinematics; (5) tectonics; (6) mechanics and (7) fluid flow. We illustrate these types of analysis using the example of faults and fractures, which typically form networks of interacting and connected segments. A framework for describing and characterising fault and fracture networks is presented for each of the structural analysis types. We suggest that any structural study be tailored to suit the desired outcome and that this scheme of analysis types should be used as a basis for the development of workflows, for the design of research projects and for testing hypotheses. For example, prediction of fluid flow through a fracture network must begin with the basic geological description of fracture types. Basic geological descriptions should be followed by measuring their geometries and topologies, understanding their age relationships, kinematic and mechanics, and developing a realistic, data-led model for related fluid flow. Missing steps can lead to fundamentally flawed interpretations.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 11 June 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 June 2018
Published date: September 2018
Keywords:
Fluid flow, Fracture networks, Geometry, Kinematics, Mechanics, structural analysis
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 423358
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/423358
ISSN: 0012-8252
PURE UUID: dcd01979-278f-462d-adbc-895a38a11720
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Sep 2018 16:30
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
D.C.P. Peacock
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics