Erratum: How and why does category learning cause categorical perception?[Published: Special Issue: Categorization: Causes and Consequences, 30, (2017)]
Erratum: How and why does category learning cause categorical perception?[Published: Special Issue: Categorization: Causes and Consequences, 30, (2017)]
"To test whether there were differences in separation or compression between the easier and harder condition we did repeated-measures ANOVAS with difficulty as a between-subject factor. Between-category separation (positive DiffB) was significant in both the easy, F(1,9) = 36.23, p < 0.001, and the hard condition, F(1,7) = 11.284, p = 0.012. In the easy condition there was also significant within-category compression (negative DiffW), t(15) = -2.461, p = 0.026, but not in the hard condition, t(7) = 1.165, p = 0.282 (Figure 6). The differences between the easy and hard condition in between-category separation were not significant, F(1,22) = 0.477 p = 0.497, but the differences in within-category compression were significant, F(1,22) = 5.330, p = 0.031.".
Pérez-Gay, Fernanda
acf861b9-ec51-4893-bb5a-d305900da6e9
Thériault, Christian
8244e41e-94ef-4302-ba5a-ebf4bc55b34f
Gregory, Madeline
0bc3e42c-6ba2-4902-b2de-f78f663f5b3a
Sabri, Hisham
a6f0ae9b-ffed-41d0-af1b-887f8e484125
Rivas, Dan
396d83c3-36b8-4afc-a426-32fc0f984dc5
Harnad, Stevan
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b
2018
Pérez-Gay, Fernanda
acf861b9-ec51-4893-bb5a-d305900da6e9
Thériault, Christian
8244e41e-94ef-4302-ba5a-ebf4bc55b34f
Gregory, Madeline
0bc3e42c-6ba2-4902-b2de-f78f663f5b3a
Sabri, Hisham
a6f0ae9b-ffed-41d0-af1b-887f8e484125
Rivas, Dan
396d83c3-36b8-4afc-a426-32fc0f984dc5
Harnad, Stevan
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b
Pérez-Gay, Fernanda, Thériault, Christian, Gregory, Madeline, Sabri, Hisham, Rivas, Dan and Harnad, Stevan
(2018)
Erratum: How and why does category learning cause categorical perception?[Published: Special Issue: Categorization: Causes and Consequences, 30, (2017)].
International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 31.
Abstract
"To test whether there were differences in separation or compression between the easier and harder condition we did repeated-measures ANOVAS with difficulty as a between-subject factor. Between-category separation (positive DiffB) was significant in both the easy, F(1,9) = 36.23, p < 0.001, and the hard condition, F(1,7) = 11.284, p = 0.012. In the easy condition there was also significant within-category compression (negative DiffW), t(15) = -2.461, p = 0.026, but not in the hard condition, t(7) = 1.165, p = 0.282 (Figure 6). The differences between the easy and hard condition in between-category separation were not significant, F(1,22) = 0.477 p = 0.497, but the differences in within-category compression were significant, F(1,22) = 5.330, p = 0.031.".
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 423627
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/423627
ISSN: 0889-3667
PURE UUID: 322d2edd-7b99-4a4a-b2ef-53aa8ec27b8f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Sep 2018 16:30
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:35
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Fernanda Pérez-Gay
Author:
Christian Thériault
Author:
Madeline Gregory
Author:
Hisham Sabri
Author:
Dan Rivas
Author:
Stevan Harnad
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics