The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top‐down control

Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top‐down control
Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top‐down control
Visual selective attention is known to be guided by stimulus-based (bottom-up) and goal-oriented (top-down) control mechanisms. Recent work has pointed out that selection history (i.e., the bias to prioritize items that have been previously attended) can result in a learning experience that also has a substantial impact on subsequent attention guidance. The present study examined to what extent goal-oriented top-down control mechanisms interact with an observer's individual selection history in guiding attention. Selection history was manipulated in a categorization task in a between-subjects design, where participants learned that either color or shape was the response-relevant dimension. The impact of this experience was assessed in a compound visual search task with an additional color distractor. Top-down preparation for each search trial was enabled by a pretrial task cue (Experiment 1) or a fixed, predictable trial sequence (Experiment 2). Reaction times and ERPs served as indicators of attention deployment. Results showed that attention was captured by the color distractor when participants had learned that color predicted the correct response in the categorization learning task, suggesting that a bias for predictive stimulus features had developed. The possibility to prepare for the search task reduced the bias, but could not entirely overrule this selection history effect. In Experiment 3, both tasks were performed in separate sessions, and the bias still persisted. These results indicate that selection history considerably shapes selective attention and continues to do so persistently even when the task allowed for high top-down control.
0048-5772
736-754
Kadel, Hanna
34b8ed05-0a59-432e-bb59-a06f9ce3830e
Feldmann-Wustefeld, Tobias
ad65a041-3b03-4374-8483-2eb878a6c909
Schubö, Anna
b76528b7-1aba-424c-ba62-242cbc0bfcd9
Kadel, Hanna
34b8ed05-0a59-432e-bb59-a06f9ce3830e
Feldmann-Wustefeld, Tobias
ad65a041-3b03-4374-8483-2eb878a6c909
Schubö, Anna
b76528b7-1aba-424c-ba62-242cbc0bfcd9

Kadel, Hanna, Feldmann-Wustefeld, Tobias and Schubö, Anna (2017) Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top‐down control. Psychophysiology, 54 (5), 736-754. (doi:10.1111/psyp.12830).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Visual selective attention is known to be guided by stimulus-based (bottom-up) and goal-oriented (top-down) control mechanisms. Recent work has pointed out that selection history (i.e., the bias to prioritize items that have been previously attended) can result in a learning experience that also has a substantial impact on subsequent attention guidance. The present study examined to what extent goal-oriented top-down control mechanisms interact with an observer's individual selection history in guiding attention. Selection history was manipulated in a categorization task in a between-subjects design, where participants learned that either color or shape was the response-relevant dimension. The impact of this experience was assessed in a compound visual search task with an additional color distractor. Top-down preparation for each search trial was enabled by a pretrial task cue (Experiment 1) or a fixed, predictable trial sequence (Experiment 2). Reaction times and ERPs served as indicators of attention deployment. Results showed that attention was captured by the color distractor when participants had learned that color predicted the correct response in the categorization learning task, suggesting that a bias for predictive stimulus features had developed. The possibility to prepare for the search task reduced the bias, but could not entirely overrule this selection history effect. In Experiment 3, both tasks were performed in separate sessions, and the bias still persisted. These results indicate that selection history considerably shapes selective attention and continues to do so persistently even when the task allowed for high top-down control.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 7 February 2017
Published date: May 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 424408
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/424408
ISSN: 0048-5772
PURE UUID: 31881c77-40cc-4dd1-90da-432c54b39c7b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Oct 2018 11:37
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 21:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Hanna Kadel
Author: Tobias Feldmann-Wustefeld
Author: Anna Schubö

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×