State formation and the politics of land in north-eastern Uganda
State formation and the politics of land in north-eastern Uganda
While most researchers criticize the effectiveness of states in Africa, state formation is proceeding, albeit gradually. This article analyzes state formation along the historically conflict-affected and fragile Karamoja–Teso sub-national border in north-eastern Uganda. I argue that the central state has consolidated control over the north-east and begun the process of politically incorporating Karamoja into Uganda for the first time in history—evidence of state formation. Yet, this success has unintentionally created space for renewed conflict in two ways: (i) a territorial conflict between and within the Teso and Karamoja local states over the legitimate location of the sub-national border, and (ii) rising competition over the utilization of land along the now secure border. I emphasize that tensions surrounding the border are far from a recent development; they are deeply rooted in political, economic, and cultural processes that stretch back centuries. This article makes the argument for evaluating state formation in Africa over the longue durée. It also seeks to build on recent work which underlines the historically contingent and shifting dynamics that shape, enable, and constrain state making in Africa.
261-285
Kandel, Matt
99bc706c-5e04-4a9d-8687-79fca960cd76
1 April 2018
Kandel, Matt
99bc706c-5e04-4a9d-8687-79fca960cd76
Kandel, Matt
(2018)
State formation and the politics of land in north-eastern Uganda.
African Affairs, 117 (467), .
(doi:10.1093/afraf/adx053).
Abstract
While most researchers criticize the effectiveness of states in Africa, state formation is proceeding, albeit gradually. This article analyzes state formation along the historically conflict-affected and fragile Karamoja–Teso sub-national border in north-eastern Uganda. I argue that the central state has consolidated control over the north-east and begun the process of politically incorporating Karamoja into Uganda for the first time in history—evidence of state formation. Yet, this success has unintentionally created space for renewed conflict in two ways: (i) a territorial conflict between and within the Teso and Karamoja local states over the legitimate location of the sub-national border, and (ii) rising competition over the utilization of land along the now secure border. I emphasize that tensions surrounding the border are far from a recent development; they are deeply rooted in political, economic, and cultural processes that stretch back centuries. This article makes the argument for evaluating state formation in Africa over the longue durée. It also seeks to build on recent work which underlines the historically contingent and shifting dynamics that shape, enable, and constrain state making in Africa.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 19 December 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 January 2018
Published date: 1 April 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 424424
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/424424
ISSN: 0001-9909
PURE UUID: 0399bb59-d913-4e0c-bfa8-02ba1acb6942
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Oct 2018 11:37
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 21:28
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics