The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A systematic review of specialist inpatient dementia care services versus standard inpatient dementia care in acute hospitals

A systematic review of specialist inpatient dementia care services versus standard inpatient dementia care in acute hospitals
A systematic review of specialist inpatient dementia care services versus standard inpatient dementia care in acute hospitals
Background: specialist inpatient dementia units (SIDU) have been developed to
address adverse outcomes often experienced by people living with dementia admitted to acute hospitals. However, the evidence base of their effectiveness remains limited.

Aim: to review the current literature to establish the comparative effectiveness of acute hospital SIDU versus standard ward care (SWC).

Methods: computerised searches of 12 biomedical databases from inception to 31st October 2017. Studies of inpatients with any form of dementia in acute hospitals, published in English-language peer-reviewed journals, using experimental, observational or qualitative study designs, comparing SIDU with SWC and which measured any qualitative or quantitative outcome of the patient or carer experience were included in the search criteria. We used a standardised data extraction and appraisal form.

Results: three of 46 full-text studies evaluated were suitable for analysis. Due to study heterogeneity, pooled odds ratios were only possible for mortality (OR 1.06 (CI 1.0 - 1.4). Otherwise, a narrative synthesis was performed. Although quantitative measures of length of stay, mortality and behavioural and psychiatric symptoms of dementia are not significantly lower, SIDU are associated with greater patient and carer satisfaction, reduced readmission rates, more accurate and comprehensive assessment processes, documentation of resuscitation decisions, and increased rates of discharge to the patient's own home.

Conclusions: although SIDU may be associated with improved care outcomes, the current evidence of their effectiveness is markedly limited. Further research and service evaluation of SIDU as a method for providing high quality dementia care in acute NHS Trusts is needed. PROSPERO: CRD42017078364.
1594-0667
595-610
McCausland, Beth
761ba09b-a55b-4752-9e0c-73a311ee26f6
Patel, Harnish
e1c0826f-d14e-49f3-8049-5b945d185523
Amin, Jay
692a8880-70ff-4b64-a7e9-7d0d53449a30
Baldwin, David
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Loughran, Kieran
4a59f882-3445-4141-a5c2-958c4b1c5a74
Osman-Hicks, Victoria
9df6f4a4-36ea-46a7-ba49-58ac022445ee
McCausland, Beth
761ba09b-a55b-4752-9e0c-73a311ee26f6
Patel, Harnish
e1c0826f-d14e-49f3-8049-5b945d185523
Amin, Jay
692a8880-70ff-4b64-a7e9-7d0d53449a30
Baldwin, David
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Loughran, Kieran
4a59f882-3445-4141-a5c2-958c4b1c5a74
Osman-Hicks, Victoria
9df6f4a4-36ea-46a7-ba49-58ac022445ee

McCausland, Beth, Patel, Harnish, Amin, Jay, Baldwin, David, Loughran, Kieran and Osman-Hicks, Victoria (2019) A systematic review of specialist inpatient dementia care services versus standard inpatient dementia care in acute hospitals. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 31 (5), 595-610, [ACER-D-18-00306]. (doi:10.1007/s40520-018-1021-y).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: specialist inpatient dementia units (SIDU) have been developed to
address adverse outcomes often experienced by people living with dementia admitted to acute hospitals. However, the evidence base of their effectiveness remains limited.

Aim: to review the current literature to establish the comparative effectiveness of acute hospital SIDU versus standard ward care (SWC).

Methods: computerised searches of 12 biomedical databases from inception to 31st October 2017. Studies of inpatients with any form of dementia in acute hospitals, published in English-language peer-reviewed journals, using experimental, observational or qualitative study designs, comparing SIDU with SWC and which measured any qualitative or quantitative outcome of the patient or carer experience were included in the search criteria. We used a standardised data extraction and appraisal form.

Results: three of 46 full-text studies evaluated were suitable for analysis. Due to study heterogeneity, pooled odds ratios were only possible for mortality (OR 1.06 (CI 1.0 - 1.4). Otherwise, a narrative synthesis was performed. Although quantitative measures of length of stay, mortality and behavioural and psychiatric symptoms of dementia are not significantly lower, SIDU are associated with greater patient and carer satisfaction, reduced readmission rates, more accurate and comprehensive assessment processes, documentation of resuscitation decisions, and increased rates of discharge to the patient's own home.

Conclusions: although SIDU may be associated with improved care outcomes, the current evidence of their effectiveness is markedly limited. Further research and service evaluation of SIDU as a method for providing high quality dementia care in acute NHS Trusts is needed. PROSPERO: CRD42017078364.

Text
ACER PDF accepted submission - Accepted Manuscript
Download (697kB)
Text
McCausland 2018 Article A Systematic Review - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 August 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 September 2018
Published date: May 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 424618
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/424618
ISSN: 1594-0667
PURE UUID: 3f9073da-6188-4eec-80ed-7166fd288ff2
ORCID for Harnish Patel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0081-1802
ORCID for Jay Amin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3792-0428
ORCID for David Baldwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-0907

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Oct 2018 11:39
Last modified: 24 Apr 2024 04:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Beth McCausland
Author: Harnish Patel ORCID iD
Author: Jay Amin ORCID iD
Author: David Baldwin ORCID iD
Author: Kieran Loughran
Author: Victoria Osman-Hicks

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×