The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Psychometric properties of acceptance measures: a systematic review

Psychometric properties of acceptance measures: a systematic review
Psychometric properties of acceptance measures: a systematic review

Acceptance is an important construct across models for understanding psychological distress. Several measures have been designed to capture this, however, there is a lack of evidence regarding the most suitable tool. The objective of this review was to systematically evaluate measurement properties of tools designed to measure self-reported acceptance. A systematic review of the literature on psychometric properties of acceptance measures was performed. Articles were selected if the primary aim was to develop or evaluate measurement properties (validity, reliability, responsiveness) of a self-report acceptance scale (or subscale). The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The quality of measurement properties were evaluated using criteria suggested by Terwee et al. (2007). All studies were independently reviewed by two raters, and inter-rater reliability was assessed. The search strategy identified 3097 unique articles. Twenty articles, reporting 32 studies, met inclusion criteria. Nine instruments were identified; two unidimensional scales of acceptance, four mindfulness tools with an acceptance subscale, and three emotion regulation scales with an acceptance-based subscale. None of the instruments were assessed across all domains of psychometric properties. No studies investigated measurement error or cross-cultural validity. Internal consistency was the most widely assessed property, and was generally acceptable across all scales. Lack of target population involvement resulted in poor content validity for most scales. Inter-rater reliability of study selection and evaluation was excellent. There are important conceptual differences across current acceptance measures, which might result from differences in theoretical models on which these are based. None of the measures evaluated can be recommended as having superior psychometric properties. Important limitations in content validity need to be addressed, with greater involvement of target populations. Further research is required to demonstrate the psychometric properties of existing measures, given their significant role in evaluating acceptance-based interventions across clinical and research settings.

Acceptance, ACT, Measurement properties, Measures, Psychometrics, Systematic review
2212-1447
1-17
McAndrews, Zoe
2753b856-abbd-48b0-90bf-f925eee4b2a3
Richardson, Jessica
a258d18d-236c-4ebd-85f3-67606a52711a
Stopa, Lusia
b52f29fc-d1c2-450d-b321-68f95fa22c40
McAndrews, Zoe
2753b856-abbd-48b0-90bf-f925eee4b2a3
Richardson, Jessica
a258d18d-236c-4ebd-85f3-67606a52711a
Stopa, Lusia
b52f29fc-d1c2-450d-b321-68f95fa22c40

McAndrews, Zoe, Richardson, Jessica and Stopa, Lusia (2018) Psychometric properties of acceptance measures: a systematic review. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1-17. (doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.08.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Acceptance is an important construct across models for understanding psychological distress. Several measures have been designed to capture this, however, there is a lack of evidence regarding the most suitable tool. The objective of this review was to systematically evaluate measurement properties of tools designed to measure self-reported acceptance. A systematic review of the literature on psychometric properties of acceptance measures was performed. Articles were selected if the primary aim was to develop or evaluate measurement properties (validity, reliability, responsiveness) of a self-report acceptance scale (or subscale). The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The quality of measurement properties were evaluated using criteria suggested by Terwee et al. (2007). All studies were independently reviewed by two raters, and inter-rater reliability was assessed. The search strategy identified 3097 unique articles. Twenty articles, reporting 32 studies, met inclusion criteria. Nine instruments were identified; two unidimensional scales of acceptance, four mindfulness tools with an acceptance subscale, and three emotion regulation scales with an acceptance-based subscale. None of the instruments were assessed across all domains of psychometric properties. No studies investigated measurement error or cross-cultural validity. Internal consistency was the most widely assessed property, and was generally acceptable across all scales. Lack of target population involvement resulted in poor content validity for most scales. Inter-rater reliability of study selection and evaluation was excellent. There are important conceptual differences across current acceptance measures, which might result from differences in theoretical models on which these are based. None of the measures evaluated can be recommended as having superior psychometric properties. Important limitations in content validity need to be addressed, with greater involvement of target populations. Further research is required to demonstrate the psychometric properties of existing measures, given their significant role in evaluating acceptance-based interventions across clinical and research settings.

Text
Psychometric Manuscript - Anonymised with revisions - Accepted Manuscript
Download (60kB)
Text
Tables for Systematic Review Paper
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Figures - PRISMA 2009 flow diagram
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 August 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 August 2018
Keywords: Acceptance, ACT, Measurement properties, Measures, Psychometrics, Systematic review

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 425057
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/425057
ISSN: 2212-1447
PURE UUID: 8fc4de7a-e439-4a94-b735-201b481d3c9e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Oct 2018 16:30
Last modified: 10 Dec 2019 05:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×