The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparing empirical and survey-based yield forecasts in a dryland agro-ecosystem

Comparing empirical and survey-based yield forecasts in a dryland agro-ecosystem
Comparing empirical and survey-based yield forecasts in a dryland agro-ecosystem

Accurate crop yield forecasts before harvest are crucial for providing early warning of agricultural losses, so that policy-makers can take steps to minimize hunger risk. Within-season surveys of farmers’ end-of-season harvest expectations are one important method governments use to develop yield forecasts. Survey-based methods have two potential limitations whose effects are poorly understood. First, survey-based forecasts may be subject to errors and biases in the response data. For example, the weather variables that most impact yields may not be the same as those that farmers consider when shaping their yield expectations, thereby undermining forecast accuracy. Secondly, surveys are typically conducted late in the growing season, giving the government less advance notices of potential crop failures or low yields, and are costly to implement. Here we investigate these limitations within the context of Zambia's annual Crop Forecast Survey (CFS). Concerning the first limitation, we analyzed the differences between CFS-predicted yields and reported yields collected by Post Harvest Surveys, and found that excess rainfall during the planting stage was more important to the actual yield than to farmers’ yield forecasts. For the second limitation, we evaluated whether a simple empirical yield forecast model could produce earlier and more accurate yield forecasts than the CFS. A random forest model using weather variables, soil texture, and soil pH as predictors were able to produce yield forecasts at the same or higher accuracy since the planting season.

Empirical modeling, Yield forecast
0168-1923
147-156
Zhao, Yi
158eb3aa-9a01-428f-9cda-663af36d6495
Vergopolan, Noemi
3c455209-3f04-4ef3-9687-d637239ec4b4
Baylis, Kathy
b4d97892-9107-404e-abbb-dc4758cf48df
Blekking, Jordan
e6099302-f5c9-4569-9417-047271c9d98f
Caylor, Kelly
9495817c-5392-47ed-a013-1d02f501aa28
Evans, Tom
66838d67-c7bc-4c6e-be3d-149970c0f0a3
Giroux, Stacey
5ddecf4a-4277-41b9-a3dc-559c7fcba9c6
Sheffield, Justin
dd66575b-a4dc-4190-ad95-df2d6aaaaa6b
Estes, Lyndon
c36eb710-c314-4074-8845-b16e53c10558
Zhao, Yi
158eb3aa-9a01-428f-9cda-663af36d6495
Vergopolan, Noemi
3c455209-3f04-4ef3-9687-d637239ec4b4
Baylis, Kathy
b4d97892-9107-404e-abbb-dc4758cf48df
Blekking, Jordan
e6099302-f5c9-4569-9417-047271c9d98f
Caylor, Kelly
9495817c-5392-47ed-a013-1d02f501aa28
Evans, Tom
66838d67-c7bc-4c6e-be3d-149970c0f0a3
Giroux, Stacey
5ddecf4a-4277-41b9-a3dc-559c7fcba9c6
Sheffield, Justin
dd66575b-a4dc-4190-ad95-df2d6aaaaa6b
Estes, Lyndon
c36eb710-c314-4074-8845-b16e53c10558

Zhao, Yi, Vergopolan, Noemi, Baylis, Kathy, Blekking, Jordan, Caylor, Kelly, Evans, Tom, Giroux, Stacey, Sheffield, Justin and Estes, Lyndon (2018) Comparing empirical and survey-based yield forecasts in a dryland agro-ecosystem. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 262, 147-156. (doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.024).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Accurate crop yield forecasts before harvest are crucial for providing early warning of agricultural losses, so that policy-makers can take steps to minimize hunger risk. Within-season surveys of farmers’ end-of-season harvest expectations are one important method governments use to develop yield forecasts. Survey-based methods have two potential limitations whose effects are poorly understood. First, survey-based forecasts may be subject to errors and biases in the response data. For example, the weather variables that most impact yields may not be the same as those that farmers consider when shaping their yield expectations, thereby undermining forecast accuracy. Secondly, surveys are typically conducted late in the growing season, giving the government less advance notices of potential crop failures or low yields, and are costly to implement. Here we investigate these limitations within the context of Zambia's annual Crop Forecast Survey (CFS). Concerning the first limitation, we analyzed the differences between CFS-predicted yields and reported yields collected by Post Harvest Surveys, and found that excess rainfall during the planting stage was more important to the actual yield than to farmers’ yield forecasts. For the second limitation, we evaluated whether a simple empirical yield forecast model could produce earlier and more accurate yield forecasts than the CFS. A random forest model using weather variables, soil texture, and soil pH as predictors were able to produce yield forecasts at the same or higher accuracy since the planting season.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 June 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 July 2018
Published date: 15 November 2018
Keywords: Empirical modeling, Yield forecast

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 425597
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/425597
ISSN: 0168-1923
PURE UUID: 6442cc1c-15d0-4dcb-95d0-d4271bc91211
ORCID for Justin Sheffield: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-0630

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Oct 2018 16:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Yi Zhao
Author: Noemi Vergopolan
Author: Kathy Baylis
Author: Jordan Blekking
Author: Kelly Caylor
Author: Tom Evans
Author: Stacey Giroux
Author: Lyndon Estes

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×