The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Investigating the predictive capacity of Eulerian CFD to model long-duration blast loads on finite cross-section geometries

Investigating the predictive capacity of Eulerian CFD to model long-duration blast loads on finite cross-section geometries
Investigating the predictive capacity of Eulerian CFD to model long-duration blast loads on finite cross-section geometries
Typically defined by positive pressure durations over 100ms, long-duration blasts can generate dynamic pressures (blast winds) capable of exerting damaging drag loads on slender structural elements such as columns. With limited availability of appropriate drag coefficients for specific structural geometries or different section orientations, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) can provide a valuable tool for calculating blast interaction and loading on user-specified geometries. Commercially available CFD programs or ‘hydrocodes’ with shock wave modelling capabilities remain based on solving the inviscid Euler equations. the ability to analyse long-duration blasts is still not confidently offered however, with no prior studies examining the accuracy of modelling interaction with relatively much smaller, finite geometries. this remains particularly challenging due to large wavelengths and time durations inherent to long-duration blasts, usually limited by impractical solution domains and computing resource. This paper presents a comparative investigation between numerical simulations and experimental results to assess the predictive capability of Eulerian CFD as a tool for calculating long-duration blast drag loading on an intricate I-section geometry from different angles of incidence. Calculated pressure-time histories on exposed geometry surfaces demonstrated good agreement although reduced accuracy and under-prediction occurred for shielded surfaces manifesting as overestimated net translational loading. Numerical discrepancies were attributed to the inviscid Euler equations underpinning the CFD solver, limiting accuracy when resolving complex aerodynamic flows at bluff I-section orientations. Results of this study provide new understanding and awareness of the numerical capability and limitations of using CFD to calculate long-duration blast loads on intricate geometries.
Blast loading, Drag loading, Eulerian CFD, Long-duration, Multi-axis
2041-9031
73-85
Denny, Jack
f1d0bbfd-965a-471e-a05c-9961c6c2916c
Clubley, Simon
d3217801-61eb-480d-a6a7-5873b5f6f0fd
Denny, Jack
f1d0bbfd-965a-471e-a05c-9961c6c2916c
Clubley, Simon
d3217801-61eb-480d-a6a7-5873b5f6f0fd

Denny, Jack and Clubley, Simon (2019) Investigating the predictive capacity of Eulerian CFD to model long-duration blast loads on finite cross-section geometries. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 9 (1), 73-85. (doi:10.2495/SAFE-V9-N1-73-85).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Typically defined by positive pressure durations over 100ms, long-duration blasts can generate dynamic pressures (blast winds) capable of exerting damaging drag loads on slender structural elements such as columns. With limited availability of appropriate drag coefficients for specific structural geometries or different section orientations, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) can provide a valuable tool for calculating blast interaction and loading on user-specified geometries. Commercially available CFD programs or ‘hydrocodes’ with shock wave modelling capabilities remain based on solving the inviscid Euler equations. the ability to analyse long-duration blasts is still not confidently offered however, with no prior studies examining the accuracy of modelling interaction with relatively much smaller, finite geometries. this remains particularly challenging due to large wavelengths and time durations inherent to long-duration blasts, usually limited by impractical solution domains and computing resource. This paper presents a comparative investigation between numerical simulations and experimental results to assess the predictive capability of Eulerian CFD as a tool for calculating long-duration blast drag loading on an intricate I-section geometry from different angles of incidence. Calculated pressure-time histories on exposed geometry surfaces demonstrated good agreement although reduced accuracy and under-prediction occurred for shielded surfaces manifesting as overestimated net translational loading. Numerical discrepancies were attributed to the inviscid Euler equations underpinning the CFD solver, limiting accuracy when resolving complex aerodynamic flows at bluff I-section orientations. Results of this study provide new understanding and awareness of the numerical capability and limitations of using CFD to calculate long-duration blast loads on intricate geometries.

Text
SSE090107f - Version of Record
Download (3MB)
Text
SSE090107f (1) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 June 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 January 2019
Published date: 2019
Keywords: Blast loading, Drag loading, Eulerian CFD, Long-duration, Multi-axis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 425632
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/425632
ISSN: 2041-9031
PURE UUID: a9a8f149-6a4f-4f37-be79-4f08857cf58f
ORCID for Simon Clubley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3779-242X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Oct 2018 17:30
Last modified: 05 Jun 2024 17:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jack Denny
Author: Simon Clubley ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×