Optimization of sensor deployment for acoustic detection and localization in terrestrial environments
Optimization of sensor deployment for acoustic detection and localization in terrestrial environments
The rapid evolution in miniaturization, power efficiency and affordability of acoustic sensors, combined with new innovations in smart capability, are vastly expanding opportunities in ground-level monitoring for wildlife conservation at a regional scale using massive sensor grids. Optimal placement of environmental sensors and probabilistic localization of sources have previously been considered only in theory, and not tested for terrestrial acoustic sensors. Conservation applications conventionally model detection as a function of distance. We developed probabilistic algorithms for near-optimal placement of sensors, and for localization of the sound source as a function of spatial variation in sound pressure. We employed a principled-GIS tool for mapping soundscapes to test the methods on a tropical-forest case study using gunshot sensors. On hilly terrain, near-optimal placement halved the required number of sensors compared to a square grid. A test deployment of acoustic devices matched the predicted success in detecting gunshots, and traced them to their local area. The methods are applicable to a broad range of target sounds. They require only an empirical estimate of sound-detection probability in response to noise level, and a soundscape simulated from a topographic habitat map. These methods allow conservation biologists to plan cost-effective deployments for measuring target sounds, and to evaluate the impacts of sub-optimal sensor placements imposed by access or cost constraints, or multipurpose uses.
Acoustic monitoring, acoustic sensors, AudioMoth, biodiversity monitoring, ecosystem management, optimisation, soundscape, submodularity
180-192
Pina-Covarrubias, Evelyn
a3202474-20c4-4a8c-b34d-713d8e060f0f
Hill, Andrew
bfc05b70-7a90-40ab-8240-4d1f56aa3e4d
Prince, Peter
78127c3d-514f-42fb-a70b-9360feab337a
Snaddon, Jake
31a601f7-c9b0-45e2-b59b-fda9a0c5a54b
Rogers, Alex
60b99721-b556-4805-ab34-deb808a8666c
Doncaster, Charles
0eff2f42-fa0a-4e35-b6ac-475ad3482047
1 June 2019
Pina-Covarrubias, Evelyn
a3202474-20c4-4a8c-b34d-713d8e060f0f
Hill, Andrew
bfc05b70-7a90-40ab-8240-4d1f56aa3e4d
Prince, Peter
78127c3d-514f-42fb-a70b-9360feab337a
Snaddon, Jake
31a601f7-c9b0-45e2-b59b-fda9a0c5a54b
Rogers, Alex
60b99721-b556-4805-ab34-deb808a8666c
Doncaster, Charles
0eff2f42-fa0a-4e35-b6ac-475ad3482047
Pina-Covarrubias, Evelyn, Hill, Andrew, Prince, Peter, Snaddon, Jake, Rogers, Alex and Doncaster, Charles
(2019)
Optimization of sensor deployment for acoustic detection and localization in terrestrial environments.
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 5 (2), .
(doi:10.1002/rse2.97).
Abstract
The rapid evolution in miniaturization, power efficiency and affordability of acoustic sensors, combined with new innovations in smart capability, are vastly expanding opportunities in ground-level monitoring for wildlife conservation at a regional scale using massive sensor grids. Optimal placement of environmental sensors and probabilistic localization of sources have previously been considered only in theory, and not tested for terrestrial acoustic sensors. Conservation applications conventionally model detection as a function of distance. We developed probabilistic algorithms for near-optimal placement of sensors, and for localization of the sound source as a function of spatial variation in sound pressure. We employed a principled-GIS tool for mapping soundscapes to test the methods on a tropical-forest case study using gunshot sensors. On hilly terrain, near-optimal placement halved the required number of sensors compared to a square grid. A test deployment of acoustic devices matched the predicted success in detecting gunshots, and traced them to their local area. The methods are applicable to a broad range of target sounds. They require only an empirical estimate of sound-detection probability in response to noise level, and a soundscape simulated from a topographic habitat map. These methods allow conservation biologists to plan cost-effective deployments for measuring target sounds, and to evaluate the impacts of sub-optimal sensor placements imposed by access or cost constraints, or multipurpose uses.
Text
Covarrubias et al 2018 Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 September 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 October 2018
Published date: 1 June 2019
Additional Information:
ª2018 The Authors
Keywords:
Acoustic monitoring, acoustic sensors, AudioMoth, biodiversity monitoring, ecosystem management, optimisation, soundscape, submodularity
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 425995
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/425995
PURE UUID: b87d2cca-3872-43ff-819a-cb853278210f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Nov 2018 17:30
Last modified: 13 Dec 2024 03:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Evelyn Pina-Covarrubias
Author:
Andrew Hill
Author:
Peter Prince
Author:
Alex Rogers
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics