The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Opinion forming in the digital age

Opinion forming in the digital age
Opinion forming in the digital age
The Internet provides fast and ubiquitous communication that enables all kinds of communities and provides citizens with easy access to vast amounts of information, although the information is not necessarily verified and may present a distorted view of real events or facts. The Internet’s power as an instant source of mass information can be used to influence opinions, which can have far-reaching consequences.

This report’s purpose is to provide input into the advisory processes that determine European support for research into the effects and management of Fake News (e.g. deliberate misinformation), Echo Chambers (e.g. closed communities where biases can be reinforced through lack of diversity in opinions), and the Internet’s influence on social and political movements such as Populism; to provide insight into how innovation that takes these aspects into account can be supported. To address this aim, this report concerns socio-technical implications of the Internet related to the impact of closed communities and misinformation and makes recommendations derived from a consultation with domain experts concerning the research needed to address specific challenges.

This study has used the Delphi Method, an iterative consultation mechanism aimed at consensus building within a targeted panel of experts. Three rounds of iteration were undertaken and a total of fourteen experts participated in all three rounds. The result of the consultation is 67 assertion statements that reached consensus amongst the experts in five broad themes, and these are presented in this report and summarised into key recommendations.

The key overarching recommendation is that we need to understand how opinions are formed and are influenced in the current digital age. Investigations are needed to understand the underlying cognitive and emotional processes that enable peoples’ opinions to be influenced in the context of a hybrid media system that mixes online and offline channels and broadcast and interactive social media.
HUB4NGI Consortium
Taylor, Steve
9ee68548-2096-4d91-a122-bbde65f91efb
Boniface, Michael
f30bfd7d-20ed-451b-b405-34e3e22fdfba
Pickering, Brian
225088d0-729e-4f17-afe2-1ad1193ccae6
Grace, Paul
b48ef8f2-b116-48ce-b774-4d43808cc02f
Bakir, Vian
6c5e6a44-0cf3-4153-a377-c7792b2c4bf7
boyd, danah
e00950db-d67f-4d6c-b456-e92d8764ae67
Engesser, Sven
33581e2e-9b75-4fee-a98d-ee6dc3726fd8
Epstein, Robert
bb7f7b16-5945-448e-822c-f524570899d9
Fawzi, Nayla
74ea73a7-a242-483f-9de8-417eb416c66e
Fernbach, Philip
33b9adaa-bb23-4329-83f6-162cde6f3335
Fisher, Dana, R
6e4c011d-1076-4484-bfa3-a7e3e709becb
Gardner, Beth Gharrity
e62ddf4a-c31e-4379-9e51-a7549c813526
Jacobs, Kristof
ecb9be34-6e8c-4d7e-844c-09de228bbc71
Jacobson, Susan
d3358b78-83e9-4694-adc7-9f0815bfb11e
Krämer, Benjamin
386e8fbb-6cf4-4573-8702-f04f3afd12ff
Kucharski, Adam
564e1358-5d0d-4a99-a84c-dd741cb76db4
McStay, Andrew
50aa04c5-5e6d-4af7-b7ea-8d8f5cd2ed7f
Mercier, Hugo
4a18280b-8b52-4952-b889-b2cbbc6f1b26
Metzger, Miriam
aeda396c-9f88-4a65-b6f5-a3189bcf2151
Polletta, Francesca
93c59e56-f317-4bbb-b3d8-18aa386643da
Quattrociocchi, Walter
fb6a15a6-dab9-4cee-9f2e-5a88cab06891
Sloman, Steven
f7079dea-7e31-4963-b3a8-19728ffafeff
Sperber, Dan
fe720489-5704-4b79-9344-1a426465cc11
Spierings, C.H.B.M.
cef0f645-4692-4e40-b6d2-2a8a04076bbc
Wardle, Claire
fe7677d2-e192-478a-add2-13b2b5216ae9
Zollo, Fabiana
b237ad22-d919-4440-a8f0-b43c851833e6
Zubiaga, Arkaitz
01b0f245-db22-4d31-9e0c-a469c677c6d5
Taylor, Steve
9ee68548-2096-4d91-a122-bbde65f91efb
Boniface, Michael
f30bfd7d-20ed-451b-b405-34e3e22fdfba
Pickering, Brian
225088d0-729e-4f17-afe2-1ad1193ccae6
Grace, Paul
b48ef8f2-b116-48ce-b774-4d43808cc02f
Bakir, Vian
6c5e6a44-0cf3-4153-a377-c7792b2c4bf7
boyd, danah
e00950db-d67f-4d6c-b456-e92d8764ae67
Engesser, Sven
33581e2e-9b75-4fee-a98d-ee6dc3726fd8
Epstein, Robert
bb7f7b16-5945-448e-822c-f524570899d9
Fawzi, Nayla
74ea73a7-a242-483f-9de8-417eb416c66e
Fernbach, Philip
33b9adaa-bb23-4329-83f6-162cde6f3335
Fisher, Dana, R
6e4c011d-1076-4484-bfa3-a7e3e709becb
Gardner, Beth Gharrity
e62ddf4a-c31e-4379-9e51-a7549c813526
Jacobs, Kristof
ecb9be34-6e8c-4d7e-844c-09de228bbc71
Jacobson, Susan
d3358b78-83e9-4694-adc7-9f0815bfb11e
Krämer, Benjamin
386e8fbb-6cf4-4573-8702-f04f3afd12ff
Kucharski, Adam
564e1358-5d0d-4a99-a84c-dd741cb76db4
McStay, Andrew
50aa04c5-5e6d-4af7-b7ea-8d8f5cd2ed7f
Mercier, Hugo
4a18280b-8b52-4952-b889-b2cbbc6f1b26
Metzger, Miriam
aeda396c-9f88-4a65-b6f5-a3189bcf2151
Polletta, Francesca
93c59e56-f317-4bbb-b3d8-18aa386643da
Quattrociocchi, Walter
fb6a15a6-dab9-4cee-9f2e-5a88cab06891
Sloman, Steven
f7079dea-7e31-4963-b3a8-19728ffafeff
Sperber, Dan
fe720489-5704-4b79-9344-1a426465cc11
Spierings, C.H.B.M.
cef0f645-4692-4e40-b6d2-2a8a04076bbc
Wardle, Claire
fe7677d2-e192-478a-add2-13b2b5216ae9
Zollo, Fabiana
b237ad22-d919-4440-a8f0-b43c851833e6
Zubiaga, Arkaitz
01b0f245-db22-4d31-9e0c-a469c677c6d5

Taylor, Steve, Boniface, Michael, Pickering, Brian, Grace, Paul, Bakir, Vian, boyd, danah, Engesser, Sven, Epstein, Robert, Fawzi, Nayla, Fernbach, Philip, Fisher, Dana, R, Gardner, Beth Gharrity, Jacobs, Kristof, Jacobson, Susan, Krämer, Benjamin, Kucharski, Adam, McStay, Andrew, Mercier, Hugo, Metzger, Miriam, Polletta, Francesca, Quattrociocchi, Walter, Sloman, Steven, Sperber, Dan, Spierings, C.H.B.M., Wardle, Claire, Zollo, Fabiana and Zubiaga, Arkaitz (2018) Opinion forming in the digital age Geneva. HUB4NGI Consortium 75pp. (doi:10.5281/zenodo.1468575).

Record type: Monograph (Project Report)

Abstract

The Internet provides fast and ubiquitous communication that enables all kinds of communities and provides citizens with easy access to vast amounts of information, although the information is not necessarily verified and may present a distorted view of real events or facts. The Internet’s power as an instant source of mass information can be used to influence opinions, which can have far-reaching consequences.

This report’s purpose is to provide input into the advisory processes that determine European support for research into the effects and management of Fake News (e.g. deliberate misinformation), Echo Chambers (e.g. closed communities where biases can be reinforced through lack of diversity in opinions), and the Internet’s influence on social and political movements such as Populism; to provide insight into how innovation that takes these aspects into account can be supported. To address this aim, this report concerns socio-technical implications of the Internet related to the impact of closed communities and misinformation and makes recommendations derived from a consultation with domain experts concerning the research needed to address specific challenges.

This study has used the Delphi Method, an iterative consultation mechanism aimed at consensus building within a targeted panel of experts. Three rounds of iteration were undertaken and a total of fourteen experts participated in all three rounds. The result of the consultation is 67 assertion statements that reached consensus amongst the experts in five broad themes, and these are presented in this report and summarised into key recommendations.

The key overarching recommendation is that we need to understand how opinions are formed and are influenced in the current digital age. Investigations are needed to understand the underlying cognitive and emotional processes that enable peoples’ opinions to be influenced in the context of a hybrid media system that mixes online and offline channels and broadcast and interactive social media.

Text
Opinion Forming in the Digital Age - Public Recommendations v1.0 - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (774kB)

More information

Published date: 22 October 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 426304
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/426304
PURE UUID: a8fa6f6c-0788-435f-8339-1ea917d1a3b4
ORCID for Steve Taylor: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9937-1762
ORCID for Michael Boniface: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-6095
ORCID for Brian Pickering: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6815-2938
ORCID for Paul Grace: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-0630

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Nov 2018 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Steve Taylor ORCID iD
Author: Brian Pickering ORCID iD
Author: Paul Grace ORCID iD
Author: Vian Bakir
Author: danah boyd
Author: Sven Engesser
Author: Robert Epstein
Author: Nayla Fawzi
Author: Philip Fernbach
Author: Dana, R Fisher
Author: Beth Gharrity Gardner
Author: Kristof Jacobs
Author: Susan Jacobson
Author: Benjamin Krämer
Author: Adam Kucharski
Author: Andrew McStay
Author: Hugo Mercier
Author: Miriam Metzger
Author: Francesca Polletta
Author: Walter Quattrociocchi
Author: Steven Sloman
Author: Dan Sperber
Author: C.H.B.M. Spierings
Author: Claire Wardle
Author: Fabiana Zollo
Author: Arkaitz Zubiaga

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×