Keeping the driver in the loop: the ‘other’ ethics of automation
Keeping the driver in the loop: the ‘other’ ethics of automation
Automated vehicles are expected to revolutionise everyday travel with
anticipated benefits of improved road safety, comfort and mobility. However,
they also raise complex ethical challenges. Ethical debates have primarily centred around moral judgements that must be made by autonomous vehicles in safetycritical situations, with proposed solutions typically based on deontological principles or consequentialism. However, ethics should also be acknowledged in the design, development and deployment of partially-automated systems that invariably rely upon the human driver to monitor and intervene when required, even though they may be ill-prepared to do so. In this literature review, we explore the lesser-discussed ethics associated with the role of, and expectations placed upon, the human driver in partially-automated vehicles, discussing factors such as the marketing and deployment of these vehicles, and the impact upon the human driver’s development of trust and complacency in automated functionality, concluding that the human driver must be kept ‘in the loop’ at all times.
1-10
Banks, Victoria
0dbdcad0-c654-4b87-a804-6a7548d0196d
Shaw, Emily
adaae8b0-7d3b-4840-81aa-803cc86adde7
Large, David
b5c8af21-9a40-444b-8b10-927ae79d2426
2018
Banks, Victoria
0dbdcad0-c654-4b87-a804-6a7548d0196d
Shaw, Emily
adaae8b0-7d3b-4840-81aa-803cc86adde7
Large, David
b5c8af21-9a40-444b-8b10-927ae79d2426
Banks, Victoria, Shaw, Emily and Large, David
(2018)
Keeping the driver in the loop: the ‘other’ ethics of automation.
In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association.
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Automated vehicles are expected to revolutionise everyday travel with
anticipated benefits of improved road safety, comfort and mobility. However,
they also raise complex ethical challenges. Ethical debates have primarily centred around moral judgements that must be made by autonomous vehicles in safetycritical situations, with proposed solutions typically based on deontological principles or consequentialism. However, ethics should also be acknowledged in the design, development and deployment of partially-automated systems that invariably rely upon the human driver to monitor and intervene when required, even though they may be ill-prepared to do so. In this literature review, we explore the lesser-discussed ethics associated with the role of, and expectations placed upon, the human driver in partially-automated vehicles, discussing factors such as the marketing and deployment of these vehicles, and the impact upon the human driver’s development of trust and complacency in automated functionality, concluding that the human driver must be kept ‘in the loop’ at all times.
Text
Keeping the driver in the loop: The 'other' ethics of automation
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Published date: 2018
Venue - Dates:
20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2018, , Florence, Italy, 2018-08-26 - 2018-08-30
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 426305
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/426305
PURE UUID: a342b844-7718-4fff-a94a-b4b32229160c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Nov 2018 17:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 22:53
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Emily Shaw
Author:
David Large
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics