The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Determinants of influenza and pertussis vaccination uptake in pregnancy: a multi-centre questionnaire study of pregnant women and healthcare professionals

Determinants of influenza and pertussis vaccination uptake in pregnancy: a multi-centre questionnaire study of pregnant women and healthcare professionals
Determinants of influenza and pertussis vaccination uptake in pregnancy: a multi-centre questionnaire study of pregnant women and healthcare professionals
Introduction: uptake rates of antenatal vaccination remain suboptimal. Our aims were to determine: (1) the acceptability of routine vaccination among pregnant women, (2) the confidence of maternity healthcare professionals (HCPs) discussing vaccination and (3) HCP opinion regarding the optimum healthcare site for vaccine administration.

Methods: separate questionnaires for pregnant women and HCPs were distributed within four NHS trusts in South England (July 2017-January 2018).

Results: responses from 314 pregnant women and 204 HCPs (18% obstetricians, 75% midwives, 7% unidentified) were analysed. Previous/intended uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccination was 78% and 92%, respectively. The commonest reason for declining vaccination was feared side-effects for their child. White British women (79%) were significantly more accepting of influenza (85% vs. 61%, OR 3.25, 95% CI: 1.67-6.32) and pertussis vaccination (96% vs. 83%, OR 4.83, 95% CI: 1.77-13.19) compared with non-white-British women. Among HCPs, 25% were slightly or not-at-all confident discussing vaccination. Obstetricians felt significantly more confident discussing pertussis vaccination than midwives (68% vs. 55% were very/moderately confident, OR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.02-4.12). Among HCPs, 53%, 25% and 16% thought vaccines should be administered in primary care (general practice), community midwifery and in hospital, respectively.

Conclusions: misconceptions exist regarding safety/efficacy of antenatal vaccination, and framing information towards the child's safety may increase uptake. Education of HCPs is essential, and vaccine promotion should be incorporated into routine antenatal care, with an emphasis on women from ethnic minorities. Administration of vaccines in primary care presents logistical barriers however support for alternative sites appears low among HCPs
0891-3668
Wilcox, Christopher R.
dd406779-15d1-494e-b3f3-38db0e453be7
Calvert, Anna
2a51489e-8ea4-4b6c-a439-ef1df57999bb
Metz, Jane
b9e1bd2d-70fa-4b7f-ab8a-0b921cdd09f5
Kilich, Eliz
e82c5965-d63d-49b4-af14-cde7929a5633
MacLeod, Rachael
8b15ba52-cd3e-4d96-b530-520dfe007f65
Beadon, Kirsten
e7e542b6-f3b0-4542-8c43-8e8c5356e8f2
Heath, Paul T.
c1874f54-5279-4438-99f2-a0ca9ded7800
Khalil, Asma
6954aa6c-ddd6-4205-976e-fe834c6a860d
Finn, Adam
1c9de3fb-4f8b-4ce4-812e-c93506254d34
Snape, Matthew D.
184fac36-63b2-40d2-be21-c972f41d07ab
Vandrevala, Tushna
45ccaf5a-cb30-40df-ba91-1ef166672468
Nadarzynski, Tom
9acfd87c-9cae-4cf6-afc2-4d4aa194f5de
Coleman, Matthew A.
ad551610-e9af-48d3-b7cb-30cea7dcd5af
Jones, Christine E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426
Wilcox, Christopher R.
dd406779-15d1-494e-b3f3-38db0e453be7
Calvert, Anna
2a51489e-8ea4-4b6c-a439-ef1df57999bb
Metz, Jane
b9e1bd2d-70fa-4b7f-ab8a-0b921cdd09f5
Kilich, Eliz
e82c5965-d63d-49b4-af14-cde7929a5633
MacLeod, Rachael
8b15ba52-cd3e-4d96-b530-520dfe007f65
Beadon, Kirsten
e7e542b6-f3b0-4542-8c43-8e8c5356e8f2
Heath, Paul T.
c1874f54-5279-4438-99f2-a0ca9ded7800
Khalil, Asma
6954aa6c-ddd6-4205-976e-fe834c6a860d
Finn, Adam
1c9de3fb-4f8b-4ce4-812e-c93506254d34
Snape, Matthew D.
184fac36-63b2-40d2-be21-c972f41d07ab
Vandrevala, Tushna
45ccaf5a-cb30-40df-ba91-1ef166672468
Nadarzynski, Tom
9acfd87c-9cae-4cf6-afc2-4d4aa194f5de
Coleman, Matthew A.
ad551610-e9af-48d3-b7cb-30cea7dcd5af
Jones, Christine E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426

Wilcox, Christopher R., Calvert, Anna, Metz, Jane, Kilich, Eliz, MacLeod, Rachael, Beadon, Kirsten, Heath, Paul T., Khalil, Asma, Finn, Adam, Snape, Matthew D., Vandrevala, Tushna, Nadarzynski, Tom, Coleman, Matthew A. and Jones, Christine E. (2019) Determinants of influenza and pertussis vaccination uptake in pregnancy: a multi-centre questionnaire study of pregnant women and healthcare professionals. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. (doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000002242).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: uptake rates of antenatal vaccination remain suboptimal. Our aims were to determine: (1) the acceptability of routine vaccination among pregnant women, (2) the confidence of maternity healthcare professionals (HCPs) discussing vaccination and (3) HCP opinion regarding the optimum healthcare site for vaccine administration.

Methods: separate questionnaires for pregnant women and HCPs were distributed within four NHS trusts in South England (July 2017-January 2018).

Results: responses from 314 pregnant women and 204 HCPs (18% obstetricians, 75% midwives, 7% unidentified) were analysed. Previous/intended uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccination was 78% and 92%, respectively. The commonest reason for declining vaccination was feared side-effects for their child. White British women (79%) were significantly more accepting of influenza (85% vs. 61%, OR 3.25, 95% CI: 1.67-6.32) and pertussis vaccination (96% vs. 83%, OR 4.83, 95% CI: 1.77-13.19) compared with non-white-British women. Among HCPs, 25% were slightly or not-at-all confident discussing vaccination. Obstetricians felt significantly more confident discussing pertussis vaccination than midwives (68% vs. 55% were very/moderately confident, OR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.02-4.12). Among HCPs, 53%, 25% and 16% thought vaccines should be administered in primary care (general practice), community midwifery and in hospital, respectively.

Conclusions: misconceptions exist regarding safety/efficacy of antenatal vaccination, and framing information towards the child's safety may increase uptake. Education of HCPs is essential, and vaccine promotion should be incorporated into routine antenatal care, with an emphasis on women from ethnic minorities. Administration of vaccines in primary care presents logistical barriers however support for alternative sites appears low among HCPs

Text
Accepted manuscript_PIDJ - Accepted Manuscript
Download (881kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 October 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 November 2018
Published date: 1 June 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 426420
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/426420
ISSN: 0891-3668
PURE UUID: cdf35587-f8c9-4454-b00a-81a0e93961a2
ORCID for Christine E. Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1523-2368

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Nov 2018 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christopher R. Wilcox
Author: Anna Calvert
Author: Jane Metz
Author: Eliz Kilich
Author: Rachael MacLeod
Author: Kirsten Beadon
Author: Paul T. Heath
Author: Asma Khalil
Author: Adam Finn
Author: Matthew D. Snape
Author: Tushna Vandrevala
Author: Tom Nadarzynski
Author: Matthew A. Coleman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×