Regionalisation of population grown projections in coastal exposure analysis
Regionalisation of population grown projections in coastal exposure analysis
Large-area coastal exposure and impact analysis has focussed on using sea-level rise (SLR) scenarios and has placed little emphasis on socioeconomic scenarios, while neglecting spatial variations of population dynamics. We use the Dynamic Interactive Vulnerability Assessment (DIVA) Framework to assess the population exposed to 1 in 100-year coastal flood events under different population scenarios, that are consistent with the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs);
and different SLR scenarios, derived from the representative concentration pathways (RCPs); and analyse the effect of accounting for regionalised population dynamics on population exposure until 2100. In a reference approach, we use homogeneous population growth on national level. In the regionalisation approaches, we test existing spatially explicit projections that also account for
urbanisation, coastal migration and urban sprawl. Our results show that projected global exposure in 2100 ranges from 100 million to 260 million, depending on the combination of SLR and population scenarios and method used for regionalising the population projections. The assessed exposure based on the regionalised approaches is higher than that derived from the reference
approach by up to 60 million people (39%). Accounting for urbanisation and coastal migration leads to an increase in exposure, whereas considering urban sprawl leads to lower exposure.
Differences between the reference and the regionalised approaches increase with higher SLR. The regionalised approaches show highest exposure under SSP5 over most of the twenty-first century, although total population in SSP5 is the second lowest overall. All methods project the largest absolute growth in exposure for Asia and relative growth for Africa.
Merkens, Jan-Ludolf
4a431698-ef82-4252-b0de-28aea9197469
Lincke, Daniel
8b279c5b-dd6e-46f4-9c8d-adf83f6ea2cd
Hinkel, Jochen
9c7e8026-955c-42cd-9179-6113efbf1339
Brown, Sally
dd3c5852-78cc-435a-9846-4f3f540f2840
Vafeidis, Athanasios
495c5e09-19a6-48c3-ab99-d76710a31584
Merkens, Jan-Ludolf
4a431698-ef82-4252-b0de-28aea9197469
Lincke, Daniel
8b279c5b-dd6e-46f4-9c8d-adf83f6ea2cd
Hinkel, Jochen
9c7e8026-955c-42cd-9179-6113efbf1339
Brown, Sally
dd3c5852-78cc-435a-9846-4f3f540f2840
Vafeidis, Athanasios
495c5e09-19a6-48c3-ab99-d76710a31584
Merkens, Jan-Ludolf, Lincke, Daniel, Hinkel, Jochen, Brown, Sally and Vafeidis, Athanasios
(2018)
Regionalisation of population grown projections in coastal exposure analysis.
Climatic Change.
(doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2334-8).
Abstract
Large-area coastal exposure and impact analysis has focussed on using sea-level rise (SLR) scenarios and has placed little emphasis on socioeconomic scenarios, while neglecting spatial variations of population dynamics. We use the Dynamic Interactive Vulnerability Assessment (DIVA) Framework to assess the population exposed to 1 in 100-year coastal flood events under different population scenarios, that are consistent with the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs);
and different SLR scenarios, derived from the representative concentration pathways (RCPs); and analyse the effect of accounting for regionalised population dynamics on population exposure until 2100. In a reference approach, we use homogeneous population growth on national level. In the regionalisation approaches, we test existing spatially explicit projections that also account for
urbanisation, coastal migration and urban sprawl. Our results show that projected global exposure in 2100 ranges from 100 million to 260 million, depending on the combination of SLR and population scenarios and method used for regionalising the population projections. The assessed exposure based on the regionalised approaches is higher than that derived from the reference
approach by up to 60 million people (39%). Accounting for urbanisation and coastal migration leads to an increase in exposure, whereas considering urban sprawl leads to lower exposure.
Differences between the reference and the regionalised approaches increase with higher SLR. The regionalised approaches show highest exposure under SSP5 over most of the twenty-first century, although total population in SSP5 is the second lowest overall. All methods project the largest absolute growth in exposure for Asia and relative growth for Africa.
Text
Manuscript_revised_round2_clean
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 November 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 November 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 426562
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/426562
ISSN: 0165-0009
PURE UUID: 4db2be61-ad95-4bfa-8a64-c91fd56efbeb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Nov 2018 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jan-Ludolf Merkens
Author:
Daniel Lincke
Author:
Jochen Hinkel
Author:
Athanasios Vafeidis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics