Rating system in healthcare: contradictions and conflicts in an English hospital
Rating system in healthcare: contradictions and conflicts in an English hospital
The changing context in the New Labour Government policy and legislation to deliver healthcare introduced in England in 1999 reflected a discontinuity in the way that the healthcare organisations are controlled and this represented a new experience for the National Health Services (NHS). This paper examines empirically the effects of the introduction of a compulsory set of performance measures on the management processes of a particular English hospital. It demonstrates the complexities involved in using performance indicators to control activities in health care organisations. It explicates the course of change experienced by a particular organisation by highlighting both the intended and unintended outcomes associated with the pressure to change to meet the demands of a specific set of key targets. This case-study based research indicates that there is the need to pay a close attention to the way that the local-level healthcare organisations are interacting. The theoretically language adopted is informed by Broadbent and Laughlin (2005)’s analysis of organisational change, which draws on Laughlin (1991) and some aspects of Habermas’ (1987) critical theory.
public sector reforms, organisational change, rating system in healthcare
University of Southampton
Agrizzi, Dila
bf4dd7b5-e685-45ca-90d8-a3e00a232401
2006
Agrizzi, Dila
bf4dd7b5-e685-45ca-90d8-a3e00a232401
Agrizzi, Dila
(2006)
Rating system in healthcare: contradictions and conflicts in an English hospital
(Discussion Papers in Centre for Research in Accounting, Accountability and Governance Working Papers, CRAAG-06-04)
Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton
27pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Project Report)
Abstract
The changing context in the New Labour Government policy and legislation to deliver healthcare introduced in England in 1999 reflected a discontinuity in the way that the healthcare organisations are controlled and this represented a new experience for the National Health Services (NHS). This paper examines empirically the effects of the introduction of a compulsory set of performance measures on the management processes of a particular English hospital. It demonstrates the complexities involved in using performance indicators to control activities in health care organisations. It explicates the course of change experienced by a particular organisation by highlighting both the intended and unintended outcomes associated with the pressure to change to meet the demands of a specific set of key targets. This case-study based research indicates that there is the need to pay a close attention to the way that the local-level healthcare organisations are interacting. The theoretically language adopted is informed by Broadbent and Laughlin (2005)’s analysis of organisational change, which draws on Laughlin (1991) and some aspects of Habermas’ (1987) critical theory.
Text
CRAAG-06-04.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2006
Keywords:
public sector reforms, organisational change, rating system in healthcare
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 42712
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/42712
PURE UUID: dbda6929-66b4-4148-afae-abe27d2f245a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Jan 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:50
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Dila Agrizzi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
Loading...
View more statistics