Legal reasoning and legal change in the age of the Internet - why the ground rules are still valid
Legal reasoning and legal change in the age of the Internet - why the ground rules are still valid
This article is a defence of conservative legal argumentation and hopes to add a dimension of realism to the debate on Internet regulation. A recognition of the law's inherent resistance to anything but incremental change, born out of its function to provide certainty and stability, must inform legal argumentation in particular in relation to legal issues arising out of a phenomenon as revolutionary as the Internet. By taking a bird's eye perspective on the arguments on the issue of whether a website is enough to assert jurisdiction over the entity behind the website, the author argues that the most efficient regulatory options are not in fact the best or realistic regulatory options if their implementation entails substantial legal disruption. Legal adjustments to accommodate new technological phenomena such as the Internet often need not be as drastic, as may appear at first sight, if the relationship between law and the marketplace or law and technological developments is properly evaluated as two way.
123-151
Kohl, U.
813ff335-441f-4027-801b-4e6fc48409c3
1 January 1999
Kohl, U.
813ff335-441f-4027-801b-4e6fc48409c3
Kohl, U.
(1999)
Legal reasoning and legal change in the age of the Internet - why the ground rules are still valid.
International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 7 (2), .
(doi:10.1093/ijlit/7.2.123).
Abstract
This article is a defence of conservative legal argumentation and hopes to add a dimension of realism to the debate on Internet regulation. A recognition of the law's inherent resistance to anything but incremental change, born out of its function to provide certainty and stability, must inform legal argumentation in particular in relation to legal issues arising out of a phenomenon as revolutionary as the Internet. By taking a bird's eye perspective on the arguments on the issue of whether a website is enough to assert jurisdiction over the entity behind the website, the author argues that the most efficient regulatory options are not in fact the best or realistic regulatory options if their implementation entails substantial legal disruption. Legal adjustments to accommodate new technological phenomena such as the Internet often need not be as drastic, as may appear at first sight, if the relationship between law and the marketplace or law and technological developments is properly evaluated as two way.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 January 1999
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 427293
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/427293
ISSN: 0967-0769
PURE UUID: 1e118bfc-468a-4811-9d09-af9d9620252a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jan 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:38
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
