Wisdom and the tragic question: Moral learning and emotional perception in leadership and organisations
Wisdom and the tragic question: Moral learning and emotional perception in leadership and organisations
Wisdom is almost always associated with doing the right thing in the right way under right circumstances in order to achieve the common good. In this paper, however, we propose that wisdom is more associated with deciding between better and worse wrongs; a winless situation we define as tragic. We suggest that addressing the tragic question is something that leaders and managers generally avoid when focusing on business decisions and choices. Yet, raising and confronting the tragic question is important for three main reasons. Firstly, it emphasises that wisdom is about recognising that doing the ethically responsible thing can sometimes lead to acting in ways that violate different ethical norms and values. Secondly, it foregrounds the issue of emotional perception in ethical decision-making. We argue that emotions are salient in directing attention to the tragic question and recognising morally ambiguous situations. Thirdly, the tragic question has important consequences for moral learning, accepting moral culpability for wrongdoing and organisational commitment to righting the wrong. We illustrate our arguments by drawing on three mini-cases: Arjuna’s dilemma in the Mahabharata, Gioia’s deliberations about his role in the Ford Pinto fires and the production of the abortion pill by French company Roussel-Uclaf.
1-13
Nayak, Ajit
215d7e25-0bc4-44ff-a015-5daf887604df
1 August 2016
Nayak, Ajit
215d7e25-0bc4-44ff-a015-5daf887604df
Nayak, Ajit
(2016)
Wisdom and the tragic question: Moral learning and emotional perception in leadership and organisations.
Journal of Business Ethics, 137 (1), .
(doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2540-5).
Abstract
Wisdom is almost always associated with doing the right thing in the right way under right circumstances in order to achieve the common good. In this paper, however, we propose that wisdom is more associated with deciding between better and worse wrongs; a winless situation we define as tragic. We suggest that addressing the tragic question is something that leaders and managers generally avoid when focusing on business decisions and choices. Yet, raising and confronting the tragic question is important for three main reasons. Firstly, it emphasises that wisdom is about recognising that doing the ethically responsible thing can sometimes lead to acting in ways that violate different ethical norms and values. Secondly, it foregrounds the issue of emotional perception in ethical decision-making. We argue that emotions are salient in directing attention to the tragic question and recognising morally ambiguous situations. Thirdly, the tragic question has important consequences for moral learning, accepting moral culpability for wrongdoing and organisational commitment to righting the wrong. We illustrate our arguments by drawing on three mini-cases: Arjuna’s dilemma in the Mahabharata, Gioia’s deliberations about his role in the Ford Pinto fires and the production of the abortion pill by French company Roussel-Uclaf.
Text
Nayak Wisdom and the tragic question
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 5 January 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 January 2015
Published date: 1 August 2016
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 427411
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/427411
ISSN: 0167-4544
PURE UUID: 6825adef-5c3d-44cc-9416-72291b66ee01
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Jan 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:39
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics