The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reforming the House of Lords: navigating representation, democracy and legitimacy at Westminster

Reforming the House of Lords: navigating representation, democracy and legitimacy at Westminster
Reforming the House of Lords: navigating representation, democracy and legitimacy at Westminster
Several schemes for reforming the House of Lords have been proposed since 1997, and each have made various claims about how they will contribute to a chamber that is more representative, more democratic and more legitimate. There has, however, been little analysis of how different actors have understood these terms, and of the conceptual confusion that has peppered their various reports. This article seeks to address this gap, and to explore the nature of the conceptual problems that have characterised the reform debate in recent years. It explores various documents that have informed the discussion over House of Lords reform – the Labour Party manifestos, the Royal Commission report, the government white paper, the Public Administration Committee report, the Joint Committee report – all of which have continued relevance in the context of the resuscitation of these deliberations following the ‘loans for peerages’ controversy in spring 2006.

0031-2290
563-581
Kelso, Alexandra
e9f198bb-27f8-412a-9360-aff01d578096
Kelso, Alexandra
e9f198bb-27f8-412a-9360-aff01d578096

Kelso, Alexandra (2006) Reforming the House of Lords: navigating representation, democracy and legitimacy at Westminster. Parliamentary Affairs, 59 (4), 563-581. (doi:10.1093/pa/gsl029).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Several schemes for reforming the House of Lords have been proposed since 1997, and each have made various claims about how they will contribute to a chamber that is more representative, more democratic and more legitimate. There has, however, been little analysis of how different actors have understood these terms, and of the conceptual confusion that has peppered their various reports. This article seeks to address this gap, and to explore the nature of the conceptual problems that have characterised the reform debate in recent years. It explores various documents that have informed the discussion over House of Lords reform – the Labour Party manifestos, the Royal Commission report, the government white paper, the Public Administration Committee report, the Joint Committee report – all of which have continued relevance in the context of the resuscitation of these deliberations following the ‘loans for peerages’ controversy in spring 2006.

Text
REFORMING HoL, PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS 2006.pdf - Other
Download (192kB)

More information

Published date: 2006
Organisations: Politics & International Relations

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 42756
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/42756
ISSN: 0031-2290
PURE UUID: ceca8dc1-87d0-4ba8-bfee-bb871457e8b4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Jan 2007
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 09:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alexandra Kelso

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×