Evaluating single-spacecraft observations of planetary magnetotails with simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 1. Spatial distributions of the neutral line
Evaluating single-spacecraft observations of planetary magnetotails with simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 1. Spatial distributions of the neutral line
 
  A simple Monte Carlo model is presented that considers the effects of spacecraft orbital sampling on the inferred distribution of magnetic flux ropes, generated through magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail current sheet. When generalized, the model allows the determination of the number of orbits required to constrain the underlying population of structures: It is able to quantify this as a function of the physical parameters of the structures (e.g., azimuthal extent and probability of generation). The model is shown adapted to the Hermean magnetotail, where the outputs are compared to the results of a recent survey. This comparison suggests that the center of Mercury's neutral line is located dawnward of midnight by 0.37+1.21
                            −1.02 RM and that the flux ropes are most likely to be wide azimuthally (∼50% of the width of the Hermean tail). The downtail location of the neutral line is not self-consistent or in agreement with previous (independent) studies unless dissipation terms are included planetward of the reconnection site; potential physical explanations are discussed. In the future the model could be adapted to other environments, for example, the dayside magnetopause or other planetary magnetotails.
flux ropes, magnetotail, Mercury, MESSENGER, Monte Carlo, reconnection
  
  
  10109-10123
  
    
      Smith, A. W.
      
        f719dbf6-612c-4ecb-9ec8-ae0ac74928eb
      
     
  
    
      Jackman, C. M.
      
        9bc3456c-b254-48f1-ade0-912c5b8b4529
      
     
  
    
      Frohmaier, C. M.
      
        9e031e04-b5ac-4949-80a5-92e5e13201c0
      
     
  
    
      Coxon, J. C.
      
        566baea5-6a30-4855-bde3-a09c115efde4
      
     
  
    
      Slavin, J. A.
      
        40c1eb46-992c-4bf4-be56-df0dcc75759a
      
     
  
    
      Fear, R. C.
      
        8755b9ed-c7dc-4cbb-ac9b-56235a0431ab
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
    
  
    
    
  
    
      December 2018
    
    
  
  
    
      Smith, A. W.
      
        f719dbf6-612c-4ecb-9ec8-ae0ac74928eb
      
     
  
    
      Jackman, C. M.
      
        9bc3456c-b254-48f1-ade0-912c5b8b4529
      
     
  
    
      Frohmaier, C. M.
      
        9e031e04-b5ac-4949-80a5-92e5e13201c0
      
     
  
    
      Coxon, J. C.
      
        566baea5-6a30-4855-bde3-a09c115efde4
      
     
  
    
      Slavin, J. A.
      
        40c1eb46-992c-4bf4-be56-df0dcc75759a
      
     
  
    
      Fear, R. C.
      
        8755b9ed-c7dc-4cbb-ac9b-56235a0431ab
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Smith, A. W., Jackman, C. M., Frohmaier, C. M., Coxon, J. C., Slavin, J. A. and Fear, R. C.
  
  
  
  
   
    (2018)
  
  
    
    Evaluating single-spacecraft observations of planetary magnetotails with simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 1. Spatial distributions of the neutral line.
  
  
  
  
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123 (12), .
  
   (doi:10.1029/2018JA025958). 
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
    
      
        
          Abstract
          A simple Monte Carlo model is presented that considers the effects of spacecraft orbital sampling on the inferred distribution of magnetic flux ropes, generated through magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail current sheet. When generalized, the model allows the determination of the number of orbits required to constrain the underlying population of structures: It is able to quantify this as a function of the physical parameters of the structures (e.g., azimuthal extent and probability of generation). The model is shown adapted to the Hermean magnetotail, where the outputs are compared to the results of a recent survey. This comparison suggests that the center of Mercury's neutral line is located dawnward of midnight by 0.37+1.21
                            −1.02 RM and that the flux ropes are most likely to be wide azimuthally (∼50% of the width of the Hermean tail). The downtail location of the neutral line is not self-consistent or in agreement with previous (independent) studies unless dissipation terms are included planetward of the reconnection site; potential physical explanations are discussed. In the future the model could be adapted to other environments, for example, the dayside magnetopause or other planetary magnetotails.
         
      
      
        
          
            
  
    Text
 Smith_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Space_Physics (1)
     - Version of Record
   
  
  
    
  
 
          
            
          
            
           
            
           
        
        
       
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Accepted/In Press date: 1 December 2018
 
    
      e-pub ahead of print date: 10 December 2018
 
    
      Published date: December 2018
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
        Keywords:
        flux ropes, magnetotail, Mercury, MESSENGER, Monte Carlo, reconnection
      
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 427614
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/427614
        
          
        
        
        
          ISSN: 2169-9380
        
        
          PURE UUID: 1bdf92ab-ec48-46a8-9930-e718f470c2ae
        
  
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 24 Jan 2019 17:30
  Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:28
  Export record
  
  
   Altmetrics
   
   
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
        
      
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              C. M. Frohmaier
            
          
        
      
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              J. A. Slavin
            
          
        
      
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics