Evaluating single spacecraft observations of planetary magnetotails with simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic flux rope signature selection effects
Evaluating single spacecraft observations of planetary magnetotails with simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic flux rope signature selection effects
 
  A Monte Carlo method of investigating the effects of placing selection criteria on the magnetic signature of in situ encounters with flux ropes is presented. The technique is applied to two recent flux rope surveys of MESSENGER data within the Hermean magnetotail. It is found that the different criteria placed upon the signatures will preferentially identify slightly different subsets of the underlying population. Quantifying the selection biases first allows the distributions of flux rope parameters to be corrected, allowing a more accurate estimation of the intrinsic distributions. This is shown with regard to the distribution of flux rope radii observed. When accounting for the selection criteria, the mean radius of Hermean magnetotail quasi-force-free flux ropes is found to be 589+273
                            −269 km. Second, it is possible to weight the known identifications in order to determine a rate of recurrence that accounts for the presence of the structures that will not be identified. In the case of the Hermean magnetotail, the average rate of quasi-force-free flux ropes is found to 0.12 min−1 when selection effects are accounted for (up from 0.05 min−1 previously inferred from observations).
flux ropes, magnetotail, Mercury, MESSENGER, Monte Carlo, reconnection
  
  
  10124-10138
  
    
      Smith, A. W.
      
        f719dbf6-612c-4ecb-9ec8-ae0ac74928eb
      
     
  
    
      Jackman, C. M.
      
        9bc3456c-b254-48f1-ade0-912c5b8b4529
      
     
  
    
      Frohmaier, C. M.
      
        9e031e04-b5ac-4949-80a5-92e5e13201c0
      
     
  
    
      Fear, R. C.
      
        8755b9ed-c7dc-4cbb-ac9b-56235a0431ab
      
     
  
    
      Slavin, J. A.
      
        40c1eb46-992c-4bf4-be56-df0dcc75759a
      
     
  
    
      Coxon, J. C.
      
        566baea5-6a30-4855-bde3-a09c115efde4
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
    
  
    
    
  
    
      December 2018
    
    
  
  
    
      Smith, A. W.
      
        f719dbf6-612c-4ecb-9ec8-ae0ac74928eb
      
     
  
    
      Jackman, C. M.
      
        9bc3456c-b254-48f1-ade0-912c5b8b4529
      
     
  
    
      Frohmaier, C. M.
      
        9e031e04-b5ac-4949-80a5-92e5e13201c0
      
     
  
    
      Fear, R. C.
      
        8755b9ed-c7dc-4cbb-ac9b-56235a0431ab
      
     
  
    
      Slavin, J. A.
      
        40c1eb46-992c-4bf4-be56-df0dcc75759a
      
     
  
    
      Coxon, J. C.
      
        566baea5-6a30-4855-bde3-a09c115efde4
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Smith, A. W., Jackman, C. M., Frohmaier, C. M., Fear, R. C., Slavin, J. A. and Coxon, J. C.
  
  
  
  
   
    (2018)
  
  
    
    Evaluating single spacecraft observations of planetary magnetotails with simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic flux rope signature selection effects.
  
  
  
  
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123 (12), .
  
   (doi:10.1029/2018JA025959). 
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
    
      
        
          Abstract
          A Monte Carlo method of investigating the effects of placing selection criteria on the magnetic signature of in situ encounters with flux ropes is presented. The technique is applied to two recent flux rope surveys of MESSENGER data within the Hermean magnetotail. It is found that the different criteria placed upon the signatures will preferentially identify slightly different subsets of the underlying population. Quantifying the selection biases first allows the distributions of flux rope parameters to be corrected, allowing a more accurate estimation of the intrinsic distributions. This is shown with regard to the distribution of flux rope radii observed. When accounting for the selection criteria, the mean radius of Hermean magnetotail quasi-force-free flux ropes is found to be 589+273
                            −269 km. Second, it is possible to weight the known identifications in order to determine a rate of recurrence that accounts for the presence of the structures that will not be identified. In the case of the Hermean magnetotail, the average rate of quasi-force-free flux ropes is found to 0.12 min−1 when selection effects are accounted for (up from 0.05 min−1 previously inferred from observations).
         
      
      
        
          
            
  
    Text
 Smith_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Space_Physics
     - Version of Record
   
  
  
    
  
 
          
            
          
            
           
            
           
        
        
       
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Accepted/In Press date: 20 November 2018
 
    
      e-pub ahead of print date: 10 December 2018
 
    
      Published date: December 2018
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
        Keywords:
        flux ropes, magnetotail, Mercury, MESSENGER, Monte Carlo, reconnection
      
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 427615
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/427615
        
          
        
        
        
          ISSN: 2169-9380
        
        
          PURE UUID: a297b54e-3f93-4927-b222-cbd2858fc8f8
        
  
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 24 Jan 2019 17:30
  Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:28
  Export record
  
  
   Altmetrics
   
   
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
        
      
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              C. M. Frohmaier
            
          
        
      
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              J. A. Slavin
            
          
        
      
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics