The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Nietzsche and the sceptics: towards a healthy life

Nietzsche and the sceptics: towards a healthy life
Nietzsche and the sceptics: towards a healthy life
The aim of this thesis is to offer a critique of Nietzsche’s project for the revaluation of values interpreted as a philosophy for a way of living aimed at achieving ‘great health’. I argue that, in this respect, it is illuminating and aids the interpretation of Nietzsche’s views on sickness and the achievement of health to compare his philosophy with that of the Pyrrhonian Sceptics whom I argue share similar philosophical objectives.

This thesis also critiques and builds on Jessica Berry’s comparative study of Nietzsche and the Pyrrhonian sceptics regarding health in which she argues for a similarity between the Pyrrhonian sceptic’s notion of health and Nietzsche’s great health. I highlight difficulties in her arguments. Instead I offer my own comparative study on health which highlights alternative similarities between Nietzsche and the Pyrrhonian sceptics, principally their rejection of orthodox philosophical principles in favour of a new way of doing philosophy. I argue that both philosophies identify a psychological sickness which they associate with adherence to conventional values – the cure for which is achieved through a comparable methodology, specifically involving the attack on dogmatism and the adoption of scepticism, doubt and suspension. I also show that both consider that philosophical deliberation should be directed towards the Socratic question ‘how should I live a good life?’
University of Southampton
Fox, Cynthia Victoria
cdd47b77-8cdb-4f8c-ba33-b0f168e5bee9
Fox, Cynthia Victoria
cdd47b77-8cdb-4f8c-ba33-b0f168e5bee9
Janaway, Christopher
61c48538-365f-416f-b6f7-dfa4d4663475
Walters, Lee
6588848d-16fa-41f1-a94b-c339c3428c13

Fox, Cynthia Victoria (2018) Nietzsche and the sceptics: towards a healthy life. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 212pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The aim of this thesis is to offer a critique of Nietzsche’s project for the revaluation of values interpreted as a philosophy for a way of living aimed at achieving ‘great health’. I argue that, in this respect, it is illuminating and aids the interpretation of Nietzsche’s views on sickness and the achievement of health to compare his philosophy with that of the Pyrrhonian Sceptics whom I argue share similar philosophical objectives.

This thesis also critiques and builds on Jessica Berry’s comparative study of Nietzsche and the Pyrrhonian sceptics regarding health in which she argues for a similarity between the Pyrrhonian sceptic’s notion of health and Nietzsche’s great health. I highlight difficulties in her arguments. Instead I offer my own comparative study on health which highlights alternative similarities between Nietzsche and the Pyrrhonian sceptics, principally their rejection of orthodox philosophical principles in favour of a new way of doing philosophy. I argue that both philosophies identify a psychological sickness which they associate with adherence to conventional values – the cure for which is achieved through a comparable methodology, specifically involving the attack on dogmatism and the adoption of scepticism, doubt and suspension. I also show that both consider that philosophical deliberation should be directed towards the Socratic question ‘how should I live a good life?’

Text
THESIS MASTER - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (2MB)

More information

Published date: 3 September 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 427689
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/427689
PURE UUID: 349561ad-b4cf-4f92-913b-18699e9557bd
ORCID for Christopher Janaway: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9600-8837
ORCID for Lee Walters: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3899-3522

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Jan 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:17

Export record

Contributors

Author: Cynthia Victoria Fox
Thesis advisor: Christopher Janaway ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Lee Walters ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×