The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Technology-push, market-demand and the missing safety-pull: a case study of American Airlines Flight 587

Technology-push, market-demand and the missing safety-pull: a case study of American Airlines Flight 587
Technology-push, market-demand and the missing safety-pull: a case study of American Airlines Flight 587
Through a critical case study of the crash of American Airlines Flight 587, this paper draws upon ‘the Social Shaping of Technology’ (SST) approach to offer a reconceptualisation of the technology‐push and market‐demand model for High‐Reliably Organisations (HROs), providing support for a third factor, called here a ‘safety‐pull’. A safety‐pull is defined as organisationally supported reflexivity in which technology innovators and frontline operators collaborate to consider the potential implications of adopting new technologies in HROs and the complex ways this change may impact human operators' work performance, often in risky and unanticipated ways. In contrast to accidents occurring solely as the result of individual operator error, analysing the safety‐pull provides a way to tease out the wide range of factors that can contribute to HRO failures and offers a new SST perspective through which to examine high‐risk operations.
0268-1072
109-127
Fraher, Amy L.
5c2ad136-717b-43b1-be85-c7a970f85116
Fraher, Amy L.
5c2ad136-717b-43b1-be85-c7a970f85116

Fraher, Amy L. (2015) Technology-push, market-demand and the missing safety-pull: a case study of American Airlines Flight 587. New Technology, Work and Employment, 30 (2), 109-127. (doi:10.1111/ntwe.12050).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Through a critical case study of the crash of American Airlines Flight 587, this paper draws upon ‘the Social Shaping of Technology’ (SST) approach to offer a reconceptualisation of the technology‐push and market‐demand model for High‐Reliably Organisations (HROs), providing support for a third factor, called here a ‘safety‐pull’. A safety‐pull is defined as organisationally supported reflexivity in which technology innovators and frontline operators collaborate to consider the potential implications of adopting new technologies in HROs and the complex ways this change may impact human operators' work performance, often in risky and unanticipated ways. In contrast to accidents occurring solely as the result of individual operator error, analysing the safety‐pull provides a way to tease out the wide range of factors that can contribute to HRO failures and offers a new SST perspective through which to examine high‐risk operations.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 21 July 2015
Published date: July 2015

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 427795
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/427795
ISSN: 0268-1072
PURE UUID: f07a84e4-f5e1-46e5-bd6f-2fcd93c5f938
ORCID for Amy L. Fraher: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-5164

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jan 2019 17:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 23:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Amy L. Fraher ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×