The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pressure from 2D snapshot PIV

Pressure from 2D snapshot PIV
Pressure from 2D snapshot PIV
In this study, we quantify the accuracy of a simple pressure estimation method from 2D snapshot PIV in attached and separated flows. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) offers the possibility to acquire a field of pressure instead of point measurements. Multiple methods may be used to obtain pressure from PIV measurements, however, the current state-of-the-art requires expensive equipment and data processing. As an alternative, we aim to quantify the efficacy of estimating instantaneous pressure from snapshot (non-time resolved) two-dimensional planar PIV (the simplest type of PIV available). To make up for the loss of temporal information, we rely on Taylor’s hypothesis (TH) to replace temporal information with spatial gradients. Application of our approach to high-resolution 2D velocity data of a turbulent boundary layer flow over ribs shows moderate to good agreement with reference pressure measurements in average and fluctuations. To assess the performance of the 2D TH method beyond average and fluctuation statistics, we acquired a time-resolved measurement of the same flow and determined temporal correlation values of the pressure from our method with reference measurements. Overall, the correlation attains good values for all measured locations. For comparison, we also applied two time-resolved approaches, which attained values of correlation similar to our approach. The performance of the 2D TH method is further assessed on 3D time-resolved velocity data for a turbulent boundary layer and compared with 3D methods. The root-mean-square (RMS) pressure fluctuations of the 2D TH, 3D TH and 3D pseudo-Lagrangian methods closely follow the pressure fluctuation distribution from DNS. These observations on the RMS pressure estimates are further supported by similar analysis on synthetic PIV data (based on DNS) of a turbulent channel flow. The values of spatial correlation between the 2D TH method and the DNS pressure fields in this case, are similar to the temporal correlations achieved in the turbulent flow over the ribs. Finally, we discuss the accuracy of instantaneous pressure estimates and provide a rule of thumb to determine regions where the pressure fluctuation estimate from the 2D TH methods is likely to fail.
0723-4864
1-18
Van Der Kindere, Jacques
dc7f8bd2-8112-489b-8c9a-b698139eeebb
Laskari, Angeliki
15fd6017-4699-4cb5-bbf1-a158e8dcd70f
Ganapathisubramani, Bharathram
5e69099f-2f39-4fdd-8a85-3ac906827052
De Kat, Roeland
d46a99a4-8653-4698-9ef4-46dd0c77ba5d
Van Der Kindere, Jacques
dc7f8bd2-8112-489b-8c9a-b698139eeebb
Laskari, Angeliki
15fd6017-4699-4cb5-bbf1-a158e8dcd70f
Ganapathisubramani, Bharathram
5e69099f-2f39-4fdd-8a85-3ac906827052
De Kat, Roeland
d46a99a4-8653-4698-9ef4-46dd0c77ba5d

Van Der Kindere, Jacques, Laskari, Angeliki, Ganapathisubramani, Bharathram and De Kat, Roeland (2019) Pressure from 2D snapshot PIV. Experiments in Fluids, 60 (32), 1-18, [32]. (doi:10.1007/s00348-019-2678-5).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In this study, we quantify the accuracy of a simple pressure estimation method from 2D snapshot PIV in attached and separated flows. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) offers the possibility to acquire a field of pressure instead of point measurements. Multiple methods may be used to obtain pressure from PIV measurements, however, the current state-of-the-art requires expensive equipment and data processing. As an alternative, we aim to quantify the efficacy of estimating instantaneous pressure from snapshot (non-time resolved) two-dimensional planar PIV (the simplest type of PIV available). To make up for the loss of temporal information, we rely on Taylor’s hypothesis (TH) to replace temporal information with spatial gradients. Application of our approach to high-resolution 2D velocity data of a turbulent boundary layer flow over ribs shows moderate to good agreement with reference pressure measurements in average and fluctuations. To assess the performance of the 2D TH method beyond average and fluctuation statistics, we acquired a time-resolved measurement of the same flow and determined temporal correlation values of the pressure from our method with reference measurements. Overall, the correlation attains good values for all measured locations. For comparison, we also applied two time-resolved approaches, which attained values of correlation similar to our approach. The performance of the 2D TH method is further assessed on 3D time-resolved velocity data for a turbulent boundary layer and compared with 3D methods. The root-mean-square (RMS) pressure fluctuations of the 2D TH, 3D TH and 3D pseudo-Lagrangian methods closely follow the pressure fluctuation distribution from DNS. These observations on the RMS pressure estimates are further supported by similar analysis on synthetic PIV data (based on DNS) of a turbulent channel flow. The values of spatial correlation between the 2D TH method and the DNS pressure fields in this case, are similar to the temporal correlations achieved in the turbulent flow over the ribs. Finally, we discuss the accuracy of instantaneous pressure estimates and provide a rule of thumb to determine regions where the pressure fluctuation estimate from the 2D TH methods is likely to fail.

Text
AuthorsAcceptedManuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Download (5MB)
Text
Kindere 2019 Article Pressure From 2D Snapshot PIV - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 January 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 January 2019
Published date: February 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 427818
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/427818
ISSN: 0723-4864
PURE UUID: 8969794c-3260-40b2-bf0d-f2777b45a236
ORCID for Bharathram Ganapathisubramani: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-0486
ORCID for Roeland De Kat: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6851-4409

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jan 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×