The dark side of advanced technologies: a case study of American Airlines Flight 587
The dark side of advanced technologies: a case study of American Airlines Flight 587
The following chapter is a dark side case study exploring two interrelated sociotechnical themes: the complex contributing factors behind airline accidents and the paradox of advanced technology, a tool that can both improve and debilitate workplace performance. It is often convenient to blame accidents and fatalities on individuals and ‘operator error’, yet there is often another side to the story. By examining the complex series of events related to the 2001 crash of American Airlines Flight 587, the case offers business and management school students an opportunity to analyze the often taken-for-granted assumptions that new technologies are always better, technological developments always improve human performance, and people who resist technological change are cynical naysayers attempting to undermine the inevitable progress new technologies provide. In addition, this case challenges the wisdom of governments allowing high-risk industries such as aviation to essentially self-regulate in today’s neoliberal environments . Through this critical lens, the case encourages students to grapple with the ethics of a real-world dilemma that was identified as potentially catastrophic years before the crash of Flight 587, yet nonetheless proceeded predictably to failure resulting in the death of 265 people. When juxtaposed against the goals of contemporary capitalism and notions of technological determinism , the case yields a variety of in-congruent issues and therefore offers the potential to generate a rich and vibrant classroom debate.
Fraher, Amy
5c2ad136-717b-43b1-be85-c7a970f85116
1 July 2017
Fraher, Amy
5c2ad136-717b-43b1-be85-c7a970f85116
Fraher, Amy
(2017)
The dark side of advanced technologies: a case study of American Airlines Flight 587.
In,
Sauerbronn, Fernanda, Fatien Diochon, Pauline, Mills, Albert J. and Raufflet, Emmanuel
(eds.)
The Dark Side 3.
Greenleaf Publishing.
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
The following chapter is a dark side case study exploring two interrelated sociotechnical themes: the complex contributing factors behind airline accidents and the paradox of advanced technology, a tool that can both improve and debilitate workplace performance. It is often convenient to blame accidents and fatalities on individuals and ‘operator error’, yet there is often another side to the story. By examining the complex series of events related to the 2001 crash of American Airlines Flight 587, the case offers business and management school students an opportunity to analyze the often taken-for-granted assumptions that new technologies are always better, technological developments always improve human performance, and people who resist technological change are cynical naysayers attempting to undermine the inevitable progress new technologies provide. In addition, this case challenges the wisdom of governments allowing high-risk industries such as aviation to essentially self-regulate in today’s neoliberal environments . Through this critical lens, the case encourages students to grapple with the ethics of a real-world dilemma that was identified as potentially catastrophic years before the crash of Flight 587, yet nonetheless proceeded predictably to failure resulting in the death of 265 people. When juxtaposed against the goals of contemporary capitalism and notions of technological determinism , the case yields a variety of in-congruent issues and therefore offers the potential to generate a rich and vibrant classroom debate.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 July 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 428065
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428065
PURE UUID: 7084d46e-f029-4db5-8c6f-6682c877b3d1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Feb 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 00:00
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Amy Fraher
Editor:
Fernanda Sauerbronn
Editor:
Pauline Fatien Diochon
Editor:
Albert J. Mills
Editor:
Emmanuel Raufflet
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics