The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in hospitalised older people: a comparison of commonly used tools

The feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in hospitalised older people: a comparison of commonly used tools
The feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in hospitalised older people: a comparison of commonly used tools
Background: frailty and sarcopenia are common amongst hospitalised older people and associated with poor healthcare outcomes. Widely recognised tools for their identification are the Fried Frailty Phenotype, its self-report version the FRAIL Scale, and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) criteria. We studied the feasibility of using these tools in a hospital setting of acute wards for older people.

Methods: patients aged 70+ years admitted to acute wards at one English hospital were prospectively recruited. The Fried Frailty Phenotype was assessed through measured grip strength, gait speed and questions on unintentional weight loss, exhaustion and physical activity. The 5-item self-reported FRAIL scale questionnaire covering the same domains was completed. Agreement between the two tools was reported using the Cohen kappa statistic. The EWGSOP criteria (gait speed, grip strength and muscle mass) were assessed by additional bedside measurement of muscle mass with bioelectrical impedance.

Results: two hundred thirty three participants (median age 80 years, 60% men) were recruited. Most (221, 95%) had their grip strength measured: 4 (2%) were unable and data were missing for 8 (3%). Only 70 (30%) completed the gait speed assessment: 153 (66%) were unable with missing data on 10 (4%). 113 (49%) participants had the bioelectrical impedance assessment. Muscle mass measurement was not possible for 84 (36%) participants: 25 patients declined, 21 patients were unavailable, 22 results were technically invalid, and 16 had clinical contra-indications. Data on 36 (15%) were missing.

Considering inability to complete grip strength or gait speed assessments as low values, data for the Fried Frailty Phenotype was available for 218 (94%) of participants; frailty was identified in 105 (48%). 230 (99%) patients completed the FRAIL scale; frailty was identified among 77 (34%). There was moderate agreement between the two frailty tools (Kappa value of 0.46, 95%CI: 0.34 to 0.58). Complete data for the EWGOSP criteria were only available for 124 (53%) patients of whom 40 (32%) had sarcopenia.

Conclusion: it was feasible to measure grip strength and complete the FRAIL scale among older inpatients in hospital. Measuring gait speed and muscle mass to identify sarcopenia was challenging in the acute setting.

1471-2318
1-7
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Howson, Fiona F. A.
8f152808-ff89-4bd3-9712-ed45f730292e
Culliford, David J.
2cbd9e50-ebf9-4a57-8957-14149ef51ddc
Aihie Sayer, Avan
fb4c2053-6d51-4fc1-9489-c3cb431b0ffb
Roberts, Helen
fb8b8c5d-45e1-4ea6-b5c7-c99a08cf0e4b
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Howson, Fiona F. A.
8f152808-ff89-4bd3-9712-ed45f730292e
Culliford, David J.
2cbd9e50-ebf9-4a57-8957-14149ef51ddc
Aihie Sayer, Avan
fb4c2053-6d51-4fc1-9489-c3cb431b0ffb
Roberts, Helen
fb8b8c5d-45e1-4ea6-b5c7-c99a08cf0e4b

Ibrahim, Kinda, Howson, Fiona F. A., Culliford, David J., Aihie Sayer, Avan and Roberts, Helen (2019) The feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in hospitalised older people: a comparison of commonly used tools. BMC Geriatrics, 19 (42), 1-7. (doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1053-y).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: frailty and sarcopenia are common amongst hospitalised older people and associated with poor healthcare outcomes. Widely recognised tools for their identification are the Fried Frailty Phenotype, its self-report version the FRAIL Scale, and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) criteria. We studied the feasibility of using these tools in a hospital setting of acute wards for older people.

Methods: patients aged 70+ years admitted to acute wards at one English hospital were prospectively recruited. The Fried Frailty Phenotype was assessed through measured grip strength, gait speed and questions on unintentional weight loss, exhaustion and physical activity. The 5-item self-reported FRAIL scale questionnaire covering the same domains was completed. Agreement between the two tools was reported using the Cohen kappa statistic. The EWGSOP criteria (gait speed, grip strength and muscle mass) were assessed by additional bedside measurement of muscle mass with bioelectrical impedance.

Results: two hundred thirty three participants (median age 80 years, 60% men) were recruited. Most (221, 95%) had their grip strength measured: 4 (2%) were unable and data were missing for 8 (3%). Only 70 (30%) completed the gait speed assessment: 153 (66%) were unable with missing data on 10 (4%). 113 (49%) participants had the bioelectrical impedance assessment. Muscle mass measurement was not possible for 84 (36%) participants: 25 patients declined, 21 patients were unavailable, 22 results were technically invalid, and 16 had clinical contra-indications. Data on 36 (15%) were missing.

Considering inability to complete grip strength or gait speed assessments as low values, data for the Fried Frailty Phenotype was available for 218 (94%) of participants; frailty was identified in 105 (48%). 230 (99%) patients completed the FRAIL scale; frailty was identified among 77 (34%). There was moderate agreement between the two frailty tools (Kappa value of 0.46, 95%CI: 0.34 to 0.58). Complete data for the EWGOSP criteria were only available for 124 (53%) patients of whom 40 (32%) had sarcopenia.

Conclusion: it was feasible to measure grip strength and complete the FRAIL scale among older inpatients in hospital. Measuring gait speed and muscle mass to identify sarcopenia was challenging in the acute setting.

Text
sarcopenia - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (436kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 January 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 February 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 428488
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428488
ISSN: 1471-2318
PURE UUID: 3bfd8470-fae3-4e8b-844f-b1bf9031292f
ORCID for Kinda Ibrahim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5709-3867

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Feb 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kinda Ibrahim ORCID iD
Author: Fiona F. A. Howson
Author: David J. Culliford
Author: Avan Aihie Sayer
Author: Helen Roberts

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×