The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Immune activation by DNA damage predicts response to chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Immune activation by DNA damage predicts response to chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Immune activation by DNA damage predicts response to chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Objective Current strategies to guide selection of neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) are inadequate. We assessed the ability of a DNA damage immune response (DDIR) assay to predict response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in OAC. Design Transcriptional profiling of 273 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prechemotherapy endoscopic OAC biopsies was performed. All patients were treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection between 2003 and 2014 at four centres in the Oesophageal Cancer Clinical and Molecular Stratification consortium. CD8 and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical staining was assessed in matched resection specimens from 126 cases. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were applied according to DDIR status for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 66 OAC samples (24%) were DDIR positive with the remaining 207 samples (76%) being DDIR negative. DDIR assay positivity was associated with improved RFS (HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.98; p=0.042) and OS (HR: 0.52; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.88; p=0.015) following multivariate analysis. DDIR-positive patients had a higher pathological response rate (p=0.033), lower nodal burden (p=0.026) and reduced circumferential margin involvement (p=0.007). No difference in OS was observed according to DDIR status in an independent surgery-alone dataset. DDIR-positive OAC tumours were also associated with the presence of CD8+ lymphocytes (intratumoural: p<0.001; stromal: p=0.026) as well as PD-L1 expression (intratumoural: p=0.047; stromal: p=0.025). Conclusion The DDIR assay is strongly predictive of benefit from DNA-damaging neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and is associated with a proinflammatory microenvironment in OAC.
1468-3288
1918-1927
Turkington, Richard
942a9511-8615-4507-bd0a-66a5e0512b0b
Knight, Laura
9f664179-4ad3-4e6b-a60f-5df6850f16a3
Blayney, Jaine K.
f4c948f3-4298-4c62-ac88-057e768039da
Secrier, Maria
27b44844-c669-4d1e-824c-8d958144170c
Douglas, Rosalie
4be898e6-c82b-4251-9f29-0d9cd56ace2b
Parkes, Eileen E.
2e6ccb6d-4a54-49cc-8367-ff1e7fe43934
Sutton, Eilis K.
772c92ee-9fc6-48e3-b87f-5c130957e1ee
Stevenson, Leanne
3715052e-c2d4-4538-85fe-b8cf86621384
McManus, Damien
856b67ad-dcb9-4482-a2d8-2692565352c8
Halliday, Sophia
2fef6b10-16f2-4f44-b0dd-fd8467258642
McCavigan, Andrena M.
ce633305-b020-40ca-a265-6668d9ed0cd7
Logan, Gemma E.
3f493edb-5d18-4670-9d09-d2a8209974cb
Walker, Steven M.
c470c42e-1400-490c-905d-ef1d66037713
Steele, Christopher J.
cb21167d-5aca-4875-927d-4a69b4d1b37c
Perner, Juliane
2cca7287-550c-4ca9-83d6-e6098a841f49
Bornschein, Jan
a33ef89b-902f-4d1b-98e0-16f5790ef57d
MacRae, Shona
84d61deb-eb94-4042-8989-ee77691925db
Miremadi, Ahmed
3eced2ca-d03b-413f-98e3-92aac7f6238d
McCarron, Eamon
8cd119f3-a7f9-43d8-9b69-597455fd6095
McQuaid, stephen
ebf53faa-7706-4458-bc8c-fc995b6a5fca
Arthur, Ken
bf5fd13b-9292-4c0e-b0c5-6a07f1fc01a8
James, Jacqueline
ca777d29-3f9e-4c93-9a9b-3c05af12cd73
Eatock, Martin
2fdc1343-9867-40f4-9bd3-5ad144277a36
O'Neill, J. Robert
15609f26-f51f-4a54-8c51-47c193c3c4a2
Noble, Fergus
4f14574c-28f2-4e04-bd95-f53c7649e1fa
Underwood, Timothy
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
Harkin, D. Paul
d5cebb67-d138-4ae3-8b5c-7be5ee4e2983
Salto-Tellez, Manuel
df86e252-0d83-4456-a3ef-48b0a2b44b20
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.
c41cd4b1-f4bd-4ae4-a63d-1f8a57a98291
Kennedy, Richard D.
ed52e275-0f77-44df-b383-7eaf643fb9bc
Turkington, Richard
942a9511-8615-4507-bd0a-66a5e0512b0b
Knight, Laura
9f664179-4ad3-4e6b-a60f-5df6850f16a3
Blayney, Jaine K.
f4c948f3-4298-4c62-ac88-057e768039da
Secrier, Maria
27b44844-c669-4d1e-824c-8d958144170c
Douglas, Rosalie
4be898e6-c82b-4251-9f29-0d9cd56ace2b
Parkes, Eileen E.
2e6ccb6d-4a54-49cc-8367-ff1e7fe43934
Sutton, Eilis K.
772c92ee-9fc6-48e3-b87f-5c130957e1ee
Stevenson, Leanne
3715052e-c2d4-4538-85fe-b8cf86621384
McManus, Damien
856b67ad-dcb9-4482-a2d8-2692565352c8
Halliday, Sophia
2fef6b10-16f2-4f44-b0dd-fd8467258642
McCavigan, Andrena M.
ce633305-b020-40ca-a265-6668d9ed0cd7
Logan, Gemma E.
3f493edb-5d18-4670-9d09-d2a8209974cb
Walker, Steven M.
c470c42e-1400-490c-905d-ef1d66037713
Steele, Christopher J.
cb21167d-5aca-4875-927d-4a69b4d1b37c
Perner, Juliane
2cca7287-550c-4ca9-83d6-e6098a841f49
Bornschein, Jan
a33ef89b-902f-4d1b-98e0-16f5790ef57d
MacRae, Shona
84d61deb-eb94-4042-8989-ee77691925db
Miremadi, Ahmed
3eced2ca-d03b-413f-98e3-92aac7f6238d
McCarron, Eamon
8cd119f3-a7f9-43d8-9b69-597455fd6095
McQuaid, stephen
ebf53faa-7706-4458-bc8c-fc995b6a5fca
Arthur, Ken
bf5fd13b-9292-4c0e-b0c5-6a07f1fc01a8
James, Jacqueline
ca777d29-3f9e-4c93-9a9b-3c05af12cd73
Eatock, Martin
2fdc1343-9867-40f4-9bd3-5ad144277a36
O'Neill, J. Robert
15609f26-f51f-4a54-8c51-47c193c3c4a2
Noble, Fergus
4f14574c-28f2-4e04-bd95-f53c7649e1fa
Underwood, Timothy
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
Harkin, D. Paul
d5cebb67-d138-4ae3-8b5c-7be5ee4e2983
Salto-Tellez, Manuel
df86e252-0d83-4456-a3ef-48b0a2b44b20
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.
c41cd4b1-f4bd-4ae4-a63d-1f8a57a98291
Kennedy, Richard D.
ed52e275-0f77-44df-b383-7eaf643fb9bc

Turkington, Richard, Knight, Laura, Blayney, Jaine K., Secrier, Maria, Douglas, Rosalie, Parkes, Eileen E., Sutton, Eilis K., Stevenson, Leanne, McManus, Damien, Halliday, Sophia, McCavigan, Andrena M., Logan, Gemma E., Walker, Steven M., Steele, Christopher J., Perner, Juliane, Bornschein, Jan, MacRae, Shona, Miremadi, Ahmed, McCarron, Eamon, McQuaid, stephen, Arthur, Ken, James, Jacqueline, Eatock, Martin, O'Neill, J. Robert, Noble, Fergus, Underwood, Timothy, Harkin, D. Paul, Salto-Tellez, Manuel, Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. and Kennedy, Richard D. (2019) Immune activation by DNA damage predicts response to chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut, 68, 1918-1927. (doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317624).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective Current strategies to guide selection of neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) are inadequate. We assessed the ability of a DNA damage immune response (DDIR) assay to predict response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in OAC. Design Transcriptional profiling of 273 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prechemotherapy endoscopic OAC biopsies was performed. All patients were treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection between 2003 and 2014 at four centres in the Oesophageal Cancer Clinical and Molecular Stratification consortium. CD8 and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical staining was assessed in matched resection specimens from 126 cases. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were applied according to DDIR status for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 66 OAC samples (24%) were DDIR positive with the remaining 207 samples (76%) being DDIR negative. DDIR assay positivity was associated with improved RFS (HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.98; p=0.042) and OS (HR: 0.52; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.88; p=0.015) following multivariate analysis. DDIR-positive patients had a higher pathological response rate (p=0.033), lower nodal burden (p=0.026) and reduced circumferential margin involvement (p=0.007). No difference in OS was observed according to DDIR status in an independent surgery-alone dataset. DDIR-positive OAC tumours were also associated with the presence of CD8+ lymphocytes (intratumoural: p<0.001; stromal: p=0.026) as well as PD-L1 expression (intratumoural: p=0.047; stromal: p=0.025). Conclusion The DDIR assay is strongly predictive of benefit from DNA-damaging neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and is associated with a proinflammatory microenvironment in OAC.

Text
DDRD in oesphageal adenocarcinoma.PURE.Gut - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 February 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 March 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 428530
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428530
ISSN: 1468-3288
PURE UUID: d67b72a2-7557-4aa3-9754-5c3b42655898
ORCID for Timothy Underwood: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-2188

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Mar 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard Turkington
Author: Laura Knight
Author: Jaine K. Blayney
Author: Maria Secrier
Author: Rosalie Douglas
Author: Eileen E. Parkes
Author: Eilis K. Sutton
Author: Leanne Stevenson
Author: Damien McManus
Author: Sophia Halliday
Author: Andrena M. McCavigan
Author: Gemma E. Logan
Author: Steven M. Walker
Author: Christopher J. Steele
Author: Juliane Perner
Author: Jan Bornschein
Author: Shona MacRae
Author: Ahmed Miremadi
Author: Eamon McCarron
Author: stephen McQuaid
Author: Ken Arthur
Author: Jacqueline James
Author: Martin Eatock
Author: J. Robert O'Neill
Author: Fergus Noble
Author: D. Paul Harkin
Author: Manuel Salto-Tellez
Author: Rebecca C. Fitzgerald
Author: Richard D. Kennedy

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×