The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age

Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age
Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age

Background

Social networking sites (SNSs) have great potential as a platform for public health interventions to address the unmet need for contraception.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions using SNSs to promote the uptake of and adherence to contraception in reproductive‐age women.
Search methods

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and six other databases on January 2018. We also searched Google Scholar, key conference proceedings, checked the reference lists of included studies, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.

Selection criteria

We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non‐randomised interventional studies (NRS) in women of reproductive age. SNSs requiring a social profile within a bounded or restricted‐access system of shared connections were included. We also included trials that utilised SNSs only or as an adjunct to an intervention. Studies had to have a follow‐up outcome assessment of at least three months.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full‐text studies, and extracted data from included studies. A third author was assigned to arbitrate areas of disagreement. Authors assessed risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We were unable to conduct a meta‐analysis due to the heterogeneity of the study designs and outcome measures.

Main results

Of the 461 unique records found, only two studies met our inclusion criteria. Both studies were conducted in the USA and were at high risk of bias. One RCT included 2284 women exposed to a web‐based SNS or nothing. The groups were no different post intervention in their self‐reported consistency of contraceptive use or knowledge of the relative effectiveness of different methods. There was a small but significant increase in the use of more effective methods (long‐acting reversible methods) at 12 months' follow‐up.

The second study, a cluster RCT with 1578 women, used a closed Facebook page showing sexual health content compared to a modified Facebook news page that avoided sexual health content. They found no differences in the use of condoms at last act of sexual intercourse at six months or the intention to use condoms between the intervention and control groups.

Authors' conclusions

Despite the prevalence of SNSs, we found little scientific evidence to support the use of SNSs to improve contraceptive use or adherence among women.
1469-493X
Jawad, Aalaa
8d7ba54d-820d-4322-980b-d3dbda4c15e0
Jawad, Issrah
e09628f5-21d6-47df-805e-32ca97489c11
Alwan, Nisreen
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
Jawad, Aalaa
8d7ba54d-820d-4322-980b-d3dbda4c15e0
Jawad, Issrah
e09628f5-21d6-47df-805e-32ca97489c11
Alwan, Nisreen
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382

Jawad, Aalaa, Jawad, Issrah and Alwan, Nisreen (2019) Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019 (3), [CD012521]. (doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012521.pub2).

Record type: Article

Abstract


Background

Social networking sites (SNSs) have great potential as a platform for public health interventions to address the unmet need for contraception.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions using SNSs to promote the uptake of and adherence to contraception in reproductive‐age women.
Search methods

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and six other databases on January 2018. We also searched Google Scholar, key conference proceedings, checked the reference lists of included studies, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.

Selection criteria

We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non‐randomised interventional studies (NRS) in women of reproductive age. SNSs requiring a social profile within a bounded or restricted‐access system of shared connections were included. We also included trials that utilised SNSs only or as an adjunct to an intervention. Studies had to have a follow‐up outcome assessment of at least three months.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full‐text studies, and extracted data from included studies. A third author was assigned to arbitrate areas of disagreement. Authors assessed risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We were unable to conduct a meta‐analysis due to the heterogeneity of the study designs and outcome measures.

Main results

Of the 461 unique records found, only two studies met our inclusion criteria. Both studies were conducted in the USA and were at high risk of bias. One RCT included 2284 women exposed to a web‐based SNS or nothing. The groups were no different post intervention in their self‐reported consistency of contraceptive use or knowledge of the relative effectiveness of different methods. There was a small but significant increase in the use of more effective methods (long‐acting reversible methods) at 12 months' follow‐up.

The second study, a cluster RCT with 1578 women, used a closed Facebook page showing sexual health content compared to a modified Facebook news page that avoided sexual health content. They found no differences in the use of condoms at last act of sexual intercourse at six months or the intention to use condoms between the intervention and control groups.

Authors' conclusions

Despite the prevalence of SNSs, we found little scientific evidence to support the use of SNSs to improve contraceptive use or adherence among women.

Text
Jawad_et_al-2019-Cochrane_Database_of_Systematic_Reviews - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (319kB)
Text
2019_Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 February 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 March 2019
Published date: March 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 428539
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428539
ISSN: 1469-493X
PURE UUID: d692b137-8ab5-4f7c-9a5f-0c7a54463ced
ORCID for Nisreen Alwan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-8463

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Mar 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Aalaa Jawad
Author: Issrah Jawad
Author: Nisreen Alwan ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×