The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The genocide acquittal in the Sikirica Case before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the coming of age of the guilty plea

The genocide acquittal in the Sikirica Case before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the coming of age of the guilty plea
The genocide acquittal in the Sikirica Case before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the coming of age of the guilty plea
This article focuses on two key aspects of the Keraterm case before the ICTY. The first is Duško Sikirica's acquittal of the crime of genocide. The Trial Chamber's construction of the phrase “destruction in part of a group” is critically examined and compared to the reasoning of a differently constituted Trial Chamber in the Krstić case. The second key aspect of the Keraterm case is the decision by all three defendants to enter into plea agreements with the Prosecutor at a relatively late stage in the trial. This article discusses the rules governing plea agreements, general sentencing factors and the extent to which guilty pleas have resulted in a pattern of lighter sentences in the jurisprudence of the Tribunals.
0922-1565
389-407
Jørgensen, Nina H.B.
0fed4805-c315-414c-a10a-b292248f0193
Jørgensen, Nina H.B.
0fed4805-c315-414c-a10a-b292248f0193

Jørgensen, Nina H.B. (2002) The genocide acquittal in the Sikirica Case before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the coming of age of the guilty plea. Leiden Journal of International Law, 15 (2), 389-407. (doi:10.1017/S0922156502000195).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article focuses on two key aspects of the Keraterm case before the ICTY. The first is Duško Sikirica's acquittal of the crime of genocide. The Trial Chamber's construction of the phrase “destruction in part of a group” is critically examined and compared to the reasoning of a differently constituted Trial Chamber in the Krstić case. The second key aspect of the Keraterm case is the decision by all three defendants to enter into plea agreements with the Prosecutor at a relatively late stage in the trial. This article discusses the rules governing plea agreements, general sentencing factors and the extent to which guilty pleas have resulted in a pattern of lighter sentences in the jurisprudence of the Tribunals.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 June 2002

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 428563
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428563
ISSN: 0922-1565
PURE UUID: ddc85e72-faf5-4613-8b07-528de0c9a997
ORCID for Nina H.B. Jørgensen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3499-8289

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Mar 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×