The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Complicity in genocide and the duality of responsibility

Complicity in genocide and the duality of responsibility
Complicity in genocide and the duality of responsibility
In 2007, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) upheld the notion that the Genocide Convention provides for state as well as individual responsibility for genocide, referring to the 'duality of responsibility' under international law. According to the ICJ, the obligation on states extends to complicity in genocide. In the meantime, the ICTY considered the relationship between 'complicity in genocide' and 'aiding and abetting genocide' within the terms of its Statute, and essentially settled the law on aiding and abetting genocide. The analysis of both the ICJ and the ICTY illustrates how problematic the legal definition of complicity in genocide has proved to be both for individual and state responsibility. This chapter examines the 'duality of responsibility' with specific reference to complicity in genocide, exploring the extent to which the issues faced by the ICJ are analogues of issues the ICTY and the ICTR grappled with but left partially unresolved.
247-274
Oxford University Press
Jørgensen, Nina H.B.
0fed4805-c315-414c-a10a-b292248f0193
Swart, Bert
Zahar, Alexander
Sluiter, Goran
Jørgensen, Nina H.B.
0fed4805-c315-414c-a10a-b292248f0193
Swart, Bert
Zahar, Alexander
Sluiter, Goran

Jørgensen, Nina H.B. (2011) Complicity in genocide and the duality of responsibility. In, Swart, Bert, Zahar, Alexander and Sluiter, Goran (eds.) The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Oxford University Press, pp. 247-274. (doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573417.003.0009).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

In 2007, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) upheld the notion that the Genocide Convention provides for state as well as individual responsibility for genocide, referring to the 'duality of responsibility' under international law. According to the ICJ, the obligation on states extends to complicity in genocide. In the meantime, the ICTY considered the relationship between 'complicity in genocide' and 'aiding and abetting genocide' within the terms of its Statute, and essentially settled the law on aiding and abetting genocide. The analysis of both the ICJ and the ICTY illustrates how problematic the legal definition of complicity in genocide has proved to be both for individual and state responsibility. This chapter examines the 'duality of responsibility' with specific reference to complicity in genocide, exploring the extent to which the issues faced by the ICJ are analogues of issues the ICTY and the ICTR grappled with but left partially unresolved.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 September 2011

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 428747
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428747
PURE UUID: b09e1086-f24f-497e-9524-def39a9181b6
ORCID for Nina H.B. Jørgensen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3499-8289

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Mar 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Editor: Bert Swart
Editor: Alexander Zahar
Editor: Goran Sluiter

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×